March 25, 2019 – Intermediate-Term Weather Report – Wettish and Perhaps Coolish

Written by Sig Silber

It is Spring so colder than climatology does not mean cold. And wetter than climatology does not mean feet of snow. But the pattern of HIgh Pressure systems shown in the first graphic in the article means that for most parts of CONUS on most days the prevailing wind will be more from the north than the south. So most days will most likely be a little cooler than climatology early in the forecast and the slow passage of low-pressure systems across CONUS will tend to create slightly wetter conditions for this time of the year. But the pattern and timing will vary from location to location.

Please share this article – Go to very top of page, right hand side for social media buttons.

For those who missed the Seasonal Update but do not wish to go back and read the full article this provides a summary for the next three months.

You can access the full report here.

Recent CONUS Weather

This is provided mainly to see the pattern in the weather that has occurred recently.

Here is the recent history of the overall atmospheric pattern for North America and the North Pacific.

 And now looking at the recent weather.

And the 30 Days ending March 16, 2019	And the 30 Days ending March 23, 2019
Less dry in Texas. Not much change in the Temperature pattern.	An overall moderation of anomalies.
Remember, these maps are a 30 average so the most distant seven days are removed and the most recent seven days are added.

Summary of the Forecast

We now provide our usual summary first for temperature and then for precipitation of small images of the four short-term maps. You can click on these maps to see larger versions. The easiest way to return to this report is by using the “Back Arrow” usually found top left corner of your screen to the left of the URL Box. Larger maps are available later in the article with the discussion and analysis.

Sometimes it is useful to see the evolution of the forecasts from the 1 – 5 Day, 6 – 10 Day (which NOAA considers to be Week-1 of their intermediate forecast) , 8 – 14 Day (which NOAA considers to be Week-2) and Week 3 and 4 (which after being issued overlap with Week-2). I do not have comparable maps for the Day 1 – 5 forecast in the same format as the three maps we generally work with. What I am showing for temperature is the Day 3 Maximum Temperature and for precipitation the five-day precipitation: the latter being fairly similar in format to the subsequent set of the maps I present each week but showing absolute QPF (inches of precipitation) not QPF deviation from Normal.

First Temperature

This shows magnitude rather than the probability of being higher or lower than Normal and shows the middle day of the five day period.	The cool anomaly has moderated except for the Western Gulf Coast. The Eastern warm anomaly may increase a bit in Week – 2.		The transition from the 8 -14 day forecast shown above to the week 3/4 forecast seems feasible

And then Precipitation

The five-day QPF is shown above. The units are different than the other maps i.e. in units of precipitation (inches) not probabilities of exceeding or being less than climatology.	Moderately wet.		The transition from the 8 -14 day forecast shown above to the week 3/4 forecast seems mostly feasible

A. Now we will begin with our regular approach and focus on Alaska and CONUS (all U.S.. except Hawaii).

Water Vapor.

This view of the past 24 hours provides a lot of insight as to what is happening.

You can see from this animation that there is a Pacific Storm arriving in Northern California and the Northwest.

Tonight, Monday March 25, 2019, as I am looking at the above graphic, you see moisture impacting California and possible set to impact Oregon and Washington State.

We now discuss Atmospheric Rivers i.e. thick concentrated movements of water moisture. More explanation on Atmospheric Rivers can be found by clicking here or if you want more theoretical information by clicking here. The idea is that we have now concluded that moisture often moves via narrow but deep channels in the atmosphere (especially when the source of the moisture is over water) rather than being very spread out. This raises the potential for extreme precipitation events. You can convert this graphic into a flexible forecasting tool by clicking here. One can obtain views of different geographical areas by clicking here.

The graphic we had been using was not updating so for the time being we added another version which is updating. It does not cover all of CONUS but it does provide a very good view of what is happening in the Pacific and the North American West Coast. But the original graphic we were using is not working so we are using both.

And this graphic is also now working again.

I have decided to include the IWT information for Europe.

And Now the Day One and Two CONUS Forecasts

Day One CONUS Forecast	Day Two CONUS Forecast
These graphics update and can be clicked on to enlarge but my brief comments are only applicable to what I see on Monday night prior to publishing.
We are starting to see convective activity as Spring arrives.

Additional useful forecasts are available from our Severe Weather Report which this week can be found here and always can be located via this directory.

60 Hour Forecast Animation

Here is a national animation of weather fronts and precipitation forecasts with four 6-hour projections of the conditions that will apply covering the next 24 hours and a second day of two 12-hour projections the second of which is the forecast for 48 hours out and to the extent it applies for 12 hours, this animation is intended to provide coverage out to 60 hours. Beyond 60 hours, additional maps are available at links provided below. The explanation for the coding used in these maps, i.e. the full legend, can be found here although it includes some symbols that are no longer shown in the graphic because they are implemented by color coding.

The below makes it easier to focus on a particular day.  The best way to read them is from left to right on the first row and then from left to right in the row below it.

include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/Weather_Map_by_Day_Matrix.htm”); ?>

What is Behind the Forecasts? Let us try to understand what NOAA is looking at when they issue these forecasts.

Below is a graphic which highlights the forecast surface Highs and the Lows re air pressure on Day 7. The Day 3 forecast can be found here. the Day 6 Forecast can be found here.

The fairly weak Aleutian Low with surface central pressure of 992 hPa is forecast on Day 7 to be impacting the West Coast. There is an Alaskan High with surface central pressure of 1032 hPa and further south and east a Mid-CONUS High with surface central pressure of 1024 hpa. The Hawaiian High is present with surface central pressure of 1020 hPa. To the east there is a Low offshore with surface central pressure of 1024 hPa which is high for a Low.

include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/Air_Pressure_Map_by_Day_Matrix.htm”); ?>

Looking at the current activity of the Jet Stream. The below graphics and the above graphics are very related.

Not all weather is controlled by the Jet Stream (which is a high altitude phenomenon) but it does play a major role in steering storm systems especially in the winter The sub-Jet Stream level intensity winds shown by the vectors in this graphic are also very important in understanding the impacts north and south of the Jet Stream which is the higher-speed part of the wind circulation and is shown in gray on this map. In some cases however a Low-Pressure System becomes separated or “cut off” from the Jet Stream. In that case it’s movements may be more difficult to predict until that disturbance is again recaptured by the Jet Stream. This usually is more significant for the lower half of CONUS with the cutoff lows being further south than the Jet Stream. Some basic information on how to interpret the impact of jet streams on weather can be found here and here. I have not provided the ability to click to get larger images as I believe the smaller images shown are easy to read.

Current	Day 5
You can see the current pattern here. It is a zonal pattern.	Almost no change. But the two branches of the Jet Stream are almost interacting (phasing)

Putting the Jet Stream into Motion and Looking Forward a Few Days Also

To see how the pattern is projected to evolve, please click here. In addition to the shaded areas which show an interpretation of the Jet Stream, one can also see the wind vectors (arrows) at the 300 Mb level.

This longer animation shows how the jet stream is crossing the Pacific and when it reaches the U.S. West Coast is going every which way.

Click here to gain access to a very flexible computer graphic. You can adjust what is being displayed by clicking on “earth” adjusting the parameters and then clicking again on “earth” to remove the menu. Right now it is set up to show the 500 hPa wind patterns which is the main way of looking at synoptic weather patterns. This amazing graphic covers North and South America. It could be included in the Worldwide weather forecast section of this report but it is useful here re understanding the wind circulation patterns.

500 MB Mid-Atmosphere View

The map below is the mid-atmosphere 7-Day chart rather than the surface highs and lows and weather features. In some cases it provides a clearer less confusing picture as it shows only the major pressure gradients. This graphic auto-updates so when you look at it you will see NOAA’s latest thinking. The speed at which these troughs and ridges travel across the nation will determine the timing of weather impacts. This graphic auto-updates I think every six hours and it changes a lot. Thinking about clockwise movements around High Pressure Systems and counter- clockwise movements around Low Pressure Systems provides a lot of information.

Here is the whole suite of similar maps for Days 3, 4, 5, 6 and repeated for Day 7. It is quite complicated. Read from left to right first  row and then left to right on the  second row. 

include (“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/500_Millibar_by_Day_Matrix.htm”); ?>

We are showing both the situation on the surface and at mid-atmosphere 500 mb for Day 7 and the view is different so sometimes it is useful to simply be able to compare them.

Here is the seven-day cumulative precipitation forecast. More information in how to interpret this graphic is available here.

Four – Week Outlook: Looking Beyond Days 1 to 5, What is the Forecast for the Following Three + Weeks?

I use “EC” in my discussions although NOAA sometimes uses “EC” (Equal Chances) and sometimes uses “N” (Normal) to pretty much indicate the same thing although “N” may be more definitive.

First – Temperature

6 – 10 Day Temperature Outlook issued today (Note the NOAA Level of Confidence in the Forecast Released on March 25, 2019 was 3 out of 5

8 – 14 Day Temperature Outlook issued today (Note the NOAA Level of Confidence in the Forecast Released on March 25, 2019 was 2 out of 5).

–

Looking further out.

Now – Precipitation

6 – 10 Day Precipitation Outlook Issued Today (Note the NOAA Level of Confidence in the Forecast Released on March 25, 2019 was 3 out of 5)

8 – 14 Day Precipitation Outlook Issued Today (Note the NOAA Level of Confidence in the Forecast Released on March 25, 2019 was 2 out of 5)

Looking further out.

Here is the 6 – 14 Day NOAA discussion released today March 25, 2019

6-10 DAY OUTLOOK FOR MAR 31 – APR 04, 2019

Today’s model solutions show an amplified 500-hPa pattern across northern North America, with less overall amplification over the continental U.S. for the 6-10 day period. Large scale features include ridging over Alaska, broad troughing over Central Canada with the axis extending into the Central U.S., and some riding over the Atlantic. The ridge over Alaska teleconnects well with the downstream troughing over Canada. The pattern equates to above normal height anomalies for Alaska, the U.S. West Coast, and also along the East Coast. The influence of troughing maintains near normal height anomalies for the remainder of the CONUS. 

The highest confidence for above normal temperatures is over Alaska and the western CONUS, underneath the ridge axis. Elsewhere temperatures look more moderated based on dynamical guidance. Both dynamical and statistical tools, including teleconnections with the Alaskan ridge, support below normal temperature probabilities over a large part of the central CONUS extending through the Mississippi Valley and the Southeast. The eastern CONUS is more uncertain. While the influence of Atlantic ridging maintains above normal  temperature probabilities on day-6, the trough axis is forecast to begin having  more of an influence thereafter, resulting in a trend toward near normal or even below normal temperatures. The ECMWF ensembles bring this trough further east than the GEFS and Canadian ensembles. Because of this uncertainty, only coastal areas of New England are favored to have above normal temperatures, with near normal forecast for much of the northeast and mid-Atlantic.

While ridging is predominately favored over the western CONUS throughout the period, an undercutting trough over the East Pacific steering shortwave energy ashore results in increased odds of above normal precipitation for the West. There is more uncertainty for the central and eastern CONUS, where the ECMWF progresses the troughing farther east than the GEFS and Canadian. The ECMWF model supports below normal precipitation over the Mississippi Valley, Ohio Valley, and the Appalachians, with above normal precipitation probabilities only for the East Coast. The GEFS, on the other hand, supports above normal precipitation probabilities much further to the west than the ECMWF ensembles. Since most of the agreement is along the east coast, that is where the highest probabilities for above normal precipitation are focused. There are also indications of a surface low impacting the northeast further enhancing probabilities. Near normal probabilities are favored further inland. Below normal precipitation is favored over much of mainland Alaska and the Panhandle, due to the influence of ridging and surface high pressure.  

FORECAST CONFIDENCE FOR THE 6-10 DAY PERIOD: Near average, 3 out of 5, due to model agreement on the overall upper level pattern, offset by some differences in placement of the large scale features.

8-14 DAY OUTLOOK FOR APR 02 – 08 2019 

For week-2, the amplified 500-hPa height pattern over northern North America is forecast to shift slightly north. This decreases the influence over the CONUS, resulting in more zonal flow and a rather uncertain forecast. As troughing over the central CONUS weakens, the ridge over the Atlantic is forecast to expand westward, with positive height anomalies building into the East. Positive height anomalies remain favored for mainland Alaska and the Panhandle with negative height anomalies becoming favored over the Aleutians due to troughing over the Central Pacific.

While week-2 is forecast to start with below normal temperatures over the central CONUS, moderation is favored later in the period as troughing pulls out of the region and Pacific flow becomes more dominant. Above normal temperature probabilities are favored for the eastern CONUS due to the aforementioned building of positive height anomalies. Above normal temperature probabilities are also favored for the West Coast under the influence of Pacific flow and weak ridging. Alaska is forecast to continue to have above normal temperatures as the ridge axis remains over the state.

Troughing in the East Pacific and Pacific flow favor increased odds of above normal precipitation in the western CONUS as multiple shortwaves impact the coast and track inland. Due to the relatively zonal flow, these disturbances are anticipated to move across the country bringing heightened precipitation chances to many areas. Developing southerly flow out of the Gulf of Mexico also favors increased chances for above normal precipitation for parts of the Plains and Mississippi Valley. Increased precipitation chances are also favored for the Northeast, where surface low pressure may impact the region early in week-2. Analog guidance also supports these higher probabilities. The ECMWF ensemble shows below normal precipitation for parts of the Southeast, but due to lack of support from other guidance, near normal is favored. Troughing in the Central Pacific favors an increase in southerly flow resulting in above normal precipitation probabilities for parts of the Aleutians and southwest mainland Alaska. Below normal probabilities are still favored for the western mainland and the Panhandle with near normal favored for the eastern mainland.

FORECAST CONFIDENCE FOR THE 8-14 DAY PERIOD: Below average, 2 out of 5, due to development of a transient pattern, and decreasing influence of large scale features.

The next set of long-lead monthly and seasonal outlooks will be released on  April 18.

Analogs to the NOAA 6 – 14 Day Outlook.

Now let us take a detailed look at the “Analogs”.

NOAA normally provides two sets of Analogs.

A. Analogs related to the 5 day period centered on 3 days ago and the 7 day period centered on 4 days ago. “Analog” means that the weather pattern then resembles the recent weather pattern and the recent pattern is used to initialize the models to predict the 6 – 14 day Outlook.

B. There is a second set of analogs associated with the Outlook. It compares the forecast (rather than the prior period) to past weather patterns. I have not been regularly analyzing this second set of information. The first set applies to the 5 and 7 day observed pattern prior to today. The second set, relates to the correlation of the forecasted outlook 6 – 10 days out and 8 – 14 days out with similar patterns that have occurred in the past during a longer period that includes the dates covered by the 6 – 10 Day and 8 – 14 Day Outlook. The second set of analogs also has useful information as it indicates that the forecast is feasible in the sense that something like it has happened before. I am not very impressed with that approach. But in some ways both Approach A and B are somewhat similar. I conclude that if the Ocean Condition now are different then the analogs and if the state of ENSO now is different than the analogs that is a reason to have increased lack of confidence in the forecasts and vice versa.

They put the first set of analogs in the discussion with the second set available by a link so I am assuming that the first set of analogs is the most meaningful and I find it so. But NOAA prefers the first set (A) as it helps them (or at least they think it does) assess the quality of the forecast.

Here are today’s analogs in chronological order although this information is also available with the analog dates listed by the level of correlation. I find the chronological order easier for me to work with. It also helps the reader see the impact of the phases of the PDO and AMO which are shown. The first set (A) which is what I am using today applies to the 5 and 7 day observed pattern prior to today.

* I assign values that are consistent with the trend so I am doing some subjective smoothing with respect to the Phases of the AMO and PDO shown in this table. (t) = a month where the Ocean Cycle Index has just changed from a consistent pattern or does change the following month to a consistent pattern.

The spread among the analogs from February 20 to April 8 is 47 days which is a wide spread and may suggest a pattern that is more difficult to forecast. I have not calculated the centroid of this distribution which would be the better way to look at things but the midpoint, which is a lot easier to calculate, and fairly accurate if the dates are reasonably evenly distributed, is about March 16, 2019. These analogs are describing historical weather that was centered on 3 days and 4 days ago (March 21 or March 22). So the analogs could be considered to be out of sync with respect to weather that we would normally be getting right now but almost a week early. .

For more information on Analogs see discussion in the GEI Weather Page Glossary. For sure it is a rough measure as there are so many historical patterns but not enough to be a perfect match with current conditions. I use it mainly to see how our current conditions match against somewhat similar patterns and the ocean phases that prevailed during those prior patterns. If everything lines up I have my own measure of confidence in the NOAA forecast. Similar initial conditions should lead to similar weather. I am a mathematician so that is how I think about models.

Including duplicates, there are four Neutral analogs, six El Nino Analogs, and zero La Nina Analogs. This suggests that El Nino may have begun to have a significant impact on the weather pattern for CONUS and Alaska. The pre-forecast analogs this week are indeterminate with respect to the McCabe scenarios.

include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/McCabe_background_information.htm”); ?>

Historical Anomaly Analysis

When I see the same dates showing up often I find it interesting to consult this list.

A Useful Read

Some might find this analysis which you need to click to read interesting as the organization which prepares it focuses on the Pacific Ocean and looks at things from a very detailed perspective and their analysis provides a lot of information on the history and evolution of ENSO events.

Some Indices of Possible Interest: We should always remember that the forecast is driven by many factors some of which are conflicting in terms of their impacts. Please pay more attention to the graphics than my commentary which does not update on a regular basis once the article is published. The indices will continue to update. I provide these indices as they are important guidelines to the weather. It is in a way looking at the factors that are impacting the weather. There were developed because weather forecasters found them to be useful.

Eastern Pacific Oscillation . Here is a pretty good explanation. It is a bit like a an extension further west of the AO.  Here is some  history and  five forecasts ranging from 4 days to 14 days. As you can see, we have been in the Negative or Cool Phase almost all winter and the forecasts are inconclusive.

Here is an other way of integrating all forecasts into a single graphic.  These forecasts extend out further into the future than the forecasts presented earlier. But they do not show the recent history.  Also the set of four does not include the AO but instead the WPO so  it is not the same but may be useful.

Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO)

The MJO is an area of convective activity along the Equator which circles the globe generally in 30 to 60 days. The location of the convective activity not only impacts the Equator but also the middle latitudes. Most people are not familiar with the MJO but at certain times it plays an important role Worldwide re weather and for CONUS.

This is the Summary from the weekly NOAA analysis of the MJO.

It is sometimes useful to look at the recent history of the MJO.

The MJO Index (more information can be found here) indicates where the MJO has been and this Hovmoeller Graphic shows this. The Index is show for the parts of the Equator where the MJO is most  usually found.

Forecast Models.

There are a lot of models and I try to read the results from all of them. For access to a variety of models, I refer readers here. This weekly report summarizes things. Here is another useful source of information.

Now the first of the two graphics we typically present which shows where the MJO is now and how it got there. 

This shows the recent history.  MJO is now in Phase 6. What next?

And then a forecast.  On this GFS graphic, the light gray shading shows the tracks which fit with 90% of the forecasts and the dark gray shading shows a smaller area that fits with 50% of the forecasts The large dot is the current location.

* Remember when clicking on an image to enlarge does not work, usually it will work to right click with your mouse and click on “view image”. Sometimes it just does not work when I set it up to enlarge by simply clicking on the image.

Here is a larger version of the graphic on the left

B. Beyond Alaska and CONUS Let’s Look at the World which of course also includes Alaska and CONUS

It is Useful to Understand the Semipermanent Pattern that Control our Weather and Consider how These Change from Winter to Summer. These two graphics (click on each one to enlarge) are from a much larger set available from the Weather Channel. They highlight the position of the Bermuda High which they are calling the Azores High in the January graphic and is often called NASH and it has a very big impact on CONUS Southeast weather and also the Southwest. You also see the north/south migration of the Pacific High which also has many names and which is extremely important for CONUS weather and it also shows the change of location of the ITCZ which I think is key to understanding the Indian Monsoon. A lot of things become much clearer when you understand these semi-permanent features some of which have cycles within the year, longer period cycles and may be impacted by Global Warming. We are now moving into Early-April. We should be returning from the set of positions shown below for the Winter Pattern to the Summer Pattern. For CONUS, the seasonal repositioning of the Bermuda High and the Pacific High are very significant.

World Forecasts

1. Today (Source: University of Maine)

2. Short-term set for day six but can be adjusted (BOM – Australia)

3. 8 – 14 Day (NOAA/Canada/Mexico Experimental NAEFS))

4 Tropical  Activity

1.  Forecast for Today (you can click on the maps to enlarge them)

And now precipitation

Additional Maps showing different weather variables can be found here.

2. Forecast for Day 6 (Currently Set for Day 6 but the reader can change that)

World Weather Forecast produced by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Unfortunately I do not know how to extract the control panel and embed it into my report so that you could use the tool within my report. But if you visit it Click Here and you will be able to use the tool to view temperature or many other things for THE WORLD. It can forecast out for a week. Pretty cool. Return to this report by using the “Back Arrow” usually found top left corner of your screen to the left of the URL Box. It may require hitting it a few times depending on how deep you are into the BOM tool. Below are the current worldwide precipitation and temperature forecasts for six days out. They will auto-update and be current for Day 6 whenever you view them. If you want the forecast for a different day Click Here

Again, please remember this graphic updates every six hours so the diurnal pattern can confuse the reader.

Now Precipitation

3. And now we have experimental 8 – 14 Day World forecasts from the NAEFS Model.

First Temperature

Then Precipitation

4. Tropical Hazards.

C. ENSO SUMMARY of Current Status. 

This section is organized into three parts.

1. Current Sea Surface Temperatures (SST)

2. Current Nino 3.4 Readings

3. The Surface Air Pressure Pattern that confirms the state of ENSO.

1. Current and Recent Sea Surface Temperatures (SST)

A major driver of weather is Surface Ocean Temperatures. Evaporation only occurs from the Surface of Water. So we are very interested in the temperatures of water especially when these temperatures deviate from seasonal norms thus creating an anomaly. The geographical distribution of the anomalies is very important. To a substantial extent, the temperature anomalies along the Equator have disproportionate impact on weather so we study them intensely and that is what the ENSO (El Nino – Southern Oscillation) cycle is all about. Subsurface water can be thought of as the future surface temperatures. They may have only indirect impacts on current weather but they have major impacts on future weather by changing the temperature of the water surface. Winds and Convection (evaporation forming clouds) is weather and is a result of the Phases of ENSO and also a feedback loop that perpetuates the current Phase of ENSO or changes it. That is why we monitor winds and convection along or near the Equator especially the Equator in the Eastern Pacific.

My focus here is sea surface temperature anomalies as they are one of the two largest factors determining weather around the World. If we want to have a good feel for future weather we need to look at the oceans as our weather mostly comes from oceans and we need to look at surface temperature anomalies (weather develops from the ocean surface

It is the ocean surface that interacts with the atmosphere and causes convection and also the warming and cooling of the atmosphere. So we are interested in the actual ocean surface temperatures and the departure from seasonal normal temperatures which is called “departures” or “anomalies”. Since warm water facilitates evaporation which results in cloud convection, the pattern of SST anomalies suggests how the weather pattern east of the anomalies will be different than normal.

Current Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Departures from Normal for this Time of the Year i.e. Anomalies

First the categorization of the current Monthly Average SST anomalies.
The Mediterranean, Black Sea and Caspian Sea	Western Pacific	West of North America	North and East of North America	North Atlantic
The Mediterranean is slightly warm. The Black Sea is neutral and the Caspian Sea is warm.	Slightly warm	Waters around Alaska slightly warm Cool offshore of CONUS Northwest	Great Lakes cool Waters offshore of East Coast warm. Davis Strait slightly warm.	Neutral
Equator	Eastern Pacific Moderately Warm
Africa	West of Australia	North, South and East of Australia	West of South America	East of South America
Warm southwest of Africa Warm off Tanzania and east of Madagascar	Cool	Warm SE to and beyond New Zealand Cool offshore to the SW	Cool north and south of the Equator. Cool 40S	Cool NE of the Equator Warm 20S to 40S Cool Cape Horn

Then we look at the change in the anomalies. The SST anomaly is sort of like the first derivative and the change in the anomaly is somewhat like a second derivative. It tells us if the anomaly is becoming more or less intense.

I am only showing the currently issued version of the NINO SST Index Table as the prior values are shown in the small graphics on the right with this graphic. The same data in graphic form but going back a couple of more years can be found here. The full table of values can be found here. NOAA considers Nino 3.4 shown in the graphic as the best indicator of Equatorial Surface Temperature Anomalies associated with different phases of ENSO. There is a duration requirement to be a recorded El Nino or La Nina but to have El Nino Conditions the Nino 3.4 index needs to be +0.5C or warmer and to have La Nina Conditions the Nino 3.4 Index needs to be -0.5C or cooler.

This graphic brings the Nino 3.4 up to date and is easy to read.

Here is a daily version

Starting with Surface Conditions.

TAO/TRITON GRAPHIC (a good way of viewing data related to the part of the Equator and the waters close to the Equator in the Eastern Pacific where we monitor to determining the current phase of ENSO. It is probably not necessary to follow the discussion below, but here is a link to TAO/TRITON terminology.

And here is the current version of the TAO/TRITON Graphic. The top part shows the actual temperatures, the bottom part shows the anomalies i.e. the deviation from normal.

This may help put the above graphics in focus.

The following graphic is some similar to the above but it updates every five days not once per week. The date shown is the midpoint for the five-day average. It shows a lot more detail than the above graphic. You can see some water at depth that is very anomalously warm.

3. The Surface Air Pressure that Confirms the Nino 3.4 Index

And of course, Queensland Australia is the official keeper of the SOI measurements.

SOI = 10 X [ Pdiff – Pdiffav ]/ SD(Pdiff) where Pdiff = (average Tahiti MSLP for the month) – (average Darwin MSLP for the month), Pdiffav = long term average of Pdiff for the month in question, and SD(Pdiff) = long term standard deviation of Pdiff for the month in question. So really it is comparing the extent to which Tahiti is more cloudy than Darwin, Australia. During El Nino we expect Darwin Australia to have lower air pressure and more convection than Tahiti (Negative SOI especially lower than -7 correlates with El Nino Conditions). During La Nina we expect the Warm Pool to be further east resulting in Positive SOI values greater than +7).

D. Putting it all Together.

At this time, La Nina Conditions along the Equator have come to an end and we are slowly entering into weak El Nino Conditions.

There is some thought now that we might have a marginal El Nino situation that extends into next Winter. JAMSTEC ruled that out but there are some signs that this could happen.  All El Nino forecasting right now runs up against the Spring Prediction Barrier (SPB) and forecasts in May are far more reliable.

E. Relevant Recent Articles and Reports

Weather in the News

Nothing to report

Global Warming in the News

Nothing to report

Useful Reference Information

Understand How the Jet Stream Impacts Weather

include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/Jet_Streak_Four_Quadrant_Analysis.htm”); ?>

include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/MJO_and_ENSO_Interaction_Matrix.htm”); ?>

Standard Pressure Levels

include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/Standard_Pressure_surfaces.htm”); ?> include(“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/Table_of_Contents_for_Part_II.htm”); ?> include (“/home4/aleta/public_html/pages/weather/modules/AO_NAO_PNA_MJO_Background_Information.htm”); ?>