Written by Steven Hansen
The U.S. new cases 7-day rolling average is 17.1 % HIGHER than the 7-day rolling average one week ago. U.S. deaths due to coronavirus are now 4.1 % LOWER than the rolling average one week ago. At the end of this post is a set of interactive graphs and tables for the world and individual States – as well as today’s headlines which include;
- More Evidence Points to Role of Blood Type in COVID-19
- Researchers Blast ‘Dangerous’ COVID-19 Herd Immunity Strategy
- Extroverts Are Less Likely to Follow COVID Restrictions
- Trump says he is now immune. Not so fast, experts warn
- Vaccine scientist says increase in Covid-19 is a “very ominous sign”
- COVID-19 Neurological Effects May Reflect Immune Response
- European countries push to combat coronavirus second wave without lockdowns
- Sharp Rise In Drug Overdose Deaths Seen During 1st Few Months Of Pandemic
- SARS-CoV-2 Worsens Outcomes in Cancer Patients
- Australian Media Finally Calls Out Davos ‘Great Reset’ Agenda
The recent worsening of the trendlines for new cases should be attributed to going back to college/university and continued loosening of regulations designed to slow the coronavirus spread.
My continuing advice is to continue to wash your hands, wear masks, and maintain social distancing. No handwashing, mask, or social distancing will guarantee you do not get infected – but it sure as hell lowers the risk in all situations – and evidence to-date shows a lower severity of COVID-19. In addition, certain activities are believed to carry a higher risk – like being inside in air conditioning and removing your mask (such as restaurants, around your children/grandchildren, bars, and gyms). It is all about viral load – and outdoor activities are generally very safe.
The daily number of new cases in the U.S. is remaining stubbornly and embarrassedly high.
The following graphs show the 7-day rolling average for new coronavirus cases and deaths have been updated through 15 October 2020:
z coronavirus.png
Coronavirus Statistics For 15 October 2020 |
U.S. Only | Global | U.S Percentage of Total | ||||
Today*** | Cumulative | Today*** | Cumulative | Today | Cumulative | |
New Confirmed Cases | 52,329 | 7,920,000 | 336,593 | 38,580,000 | 15.5% | 20.5% |
Deaths** | 970 | 216,872 | 5,859 | 1,090,000 | 16.6% | 19.9% |
Mortality Rate | 1.6% | 2.7% | 1.7% | 2.8% | ||
total COVID-19 Tests per 1,000 people | 2.01* | 384.43* |
Source: EU CDC
* as of 10 Oct 2020
** evidently several States included “probable” deaths today in the number
*** red color indicates record number
Coronavirus News You May Have Missed
COVID-19 Neurological Effects May Reflect Immune Response – Medscape
The new coronavirus might not be having major direct effects on the brain despite neurological issues that have been widely reported, a new paper suggests.
Researchers examined brains of 43 COVID-19 patients who died in intensive care units, nursing homes, regular hospital wards, or at home. They found coronavirus proteins in the brain stem, but little involvement of the frontal lobe.
They also saw increases in astrocytes, signaling destruction of nearby neurons. Because critical illness itself can contribute to this finding, it is not clear that COVID-19 is the direct cause.
The presence of the virus was not associated with the severity of brain tissue changes, researchers said.
All of the brains showed signs of neuroimmune activation, however.
Patients’ neurological symptoms might be due to the body’s immune response, rather than to direct central nervous system damage from the virus, the authors speculate in The Lancet Neurology.
“We have started to define the immune reaction to SARS-CoV-2 virus in the brain,” coauthor Markus Glatzel of University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in German told Reuters. “We think that the neuroimmune reaction may be a factor explaining some of the neurological symptoms seen in COVID-19 patients.”
Giving a COVID Vaccine to This Age Group First Would Be the Most Effective Way of Stopping Spread – Newsweek
Giving a COVID-19 vaccine—if and when one becomes available—to people in the 30-59 age group first would be the most effective way of curbing the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, a study has found.
In a pre-print paper—meaning one that has not been peer-reviewed—posted to the online server medrxiv.org, an international team of scientists concluded that initially targeting any coronavirus vaccine to young and middle-aged adults in this age group could “more than double” its effectiveness when it comes to reducing transmission of the virus.
The team found that in 179 countries, individuals between 30 and 59 years of age tend to be the “highest priority” group because of high contact rates with others, as well as higher risk of infection and disease.
The researchers said that targeting the allocation of a vaccine could have a significant impact on its effectiveness.
“The vaccine should be initially targeted to young and middle-aged adults as these individuals are the most likely to become infected and transmit infection,” Michael Meehan, lead author of the study from James Cook University in Australia, told Newsweek. “By targeting specific age groups we can substantially reduce the number of doses required to achieve an equivalent reduction in transmission—compared with un-targeted strategies.”
“Since it is unlikely that the vaccine will be 100 percent effective in all recipients, very large fractions (80-90 percent) of the population will be required to be vaccinated in order to achieve herd immunity, through vaccination alone. However, this fraction can be considerably reduced—for example, by 50-60 percent—if doses are targeted to priority age groups.”
[editor’s note: this post is worth a full read]
European countries push to combat coronavirus second wave without lockdowns – Axios
Germany on Thursday became the latest European country to announce new restrictions this week amid record coronavirus case numbers. But governments are seeking to avoid a second round of nationwide lockdowns.
Why it matters: Widespread lockdowns to contain the spread of the virus have devastated economies around the world.
In France, President Emmanuel Macron announced in a televised address Wednesday a curfew from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. would be imposed on Paris and its surrounding regions, and in the cities of Marseille, Lyon, Lille, Toulouse, Montpellier, Grenoble, Rouen and Saint-Étienne.
In the United Kingdom, the government introduced a three-tier alert system for towns and cities this week — with Liverpool the first to face the toughest restrictions whereby measures include the closure of bars that don’t serve food.
Russia registered a record 14,231 new cases Wednesday, but officials were focusing on touting a coronavirus vaccine developed by the country, the New York Times reports.
Italy on Wednesday surpassed its record number of cases with 7,332 new infections.
In Spain, Authorities in Catalonia ordered restaurants and bars that don’t offer takeaways to shut for 15 days from Thursday, per AFP.
The Netherlands government imposed a “partial lockdown” that began at 10 p.m. Wednesday local time, forcing cafes, bars and restaurants to shut for four weeks, according to DutchNews.nl.
Portugal Prime Minister Antonio Costa announced Wednesday gatherings would be limited to five people and declared a “state of calamity,” as the country confirmed more than 2,000 cases in a single day for the first time, Anadolou Agency notes.
The Czech government on Wednesday announced household guests must be limited to three people, alcohol could not be sold after 8 p.m. and there would be a “wider mandatory use of face masks,” AFP reports.
More Evidence Points to Role of Blood Type in COVID-19 – MedPage
Additional evidence continued to suggest blood type may not only play a role in COVID-19 susceptibility, but also severity of infection, according to two retrospective studies.
In Denmark, blood type O was associated with reduced risk of developing COVID-19 (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.91), based on the proportion of those with type O blood who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared with a reference population, reported Torben Barington, MD, of Odense University Hospital, and colleagues.
However, there was no increased risk for COVID-19 hospitalization or death associated with blood type, the authors wrote in Blood Advances.
Limitations to the data include that ABO blood group information was only available for 62% of individuals, and that the sex of the testing population was skewed, with women accounting for 71% who tested negative and 67% who tested positive.
They pointed to the recent research that blood type plays a role in infection, noting the lower than expected prevalence of blood group O individuals among COVID-19 patients. Researchers also observed how blood groups are “increasingly recognized to influence susceptibility to certain viruses,” among them SARS-CoV-1 and norovirus, adding that individuals with A, B, and AB blood types may be at “increased risk for thrombosis and cardiovascular diseases,” which are important comorbidities among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
Meanwhile, a second, smaller study in Blood Advances did report a connection between blood type and COVID-19 severity.
Blood types A or AB in COVID-19 patients were associated with increased risk for mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, and prolonged ICU admission versus patients with blood type O or B, according to Mypinder Sekhon, MD, of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, and colleagues. Inflammatory cytokines did not differ between groups, however.
These authors also cited research that found that blood groups were linked to virus susceptibility, but that the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection severity and blood groups remains “unresolved.” However, COVID-19 appears to be a multisystem disease with renal and hepatic manifestations.
Australian Media Finally Calls Out Davos ‘Great Reset’ Agenda – 21st Century Wire
[editor’s note: normally I would not publish fringe material such as this. But Facebook and Twitter and the rest of the social networks and mass media have chosen to censor right wing opinion (and some left wing material). Who are they to censor thoughts – even if their opinions are wrong! I believe in any opinion, no matter how far off base, there exists some truth. The problem with most left and right wing opinion is that it only connects the dots which confirm their conclusions whilst ignoring all dots which are contrary.]
This week, Sky News Australia contributor and former Australian Senator Cory Bernardi, tore open the debate on COVID after calling out a globalist agenda which few in mainstream media have dared to mention so far.
Since lockdowns began in March of 2020, few have challenged the government rationale for voluntarily imploding their economies and destroying communities and societies – based on a guess that coronavirus might kill tens of millions of citizens.
However, Bernardi believes that the COVID-19 pandemic hysteria is being used as the Trojan horse for a globalist agenda hatched out of the World Economic Forum in Davos. It’s called The Great Reset, and its designed by elite billionaires supposedly to bring about ‘social and economic change.’
“There is something unusual about the continuing pandemic panic,” said Bernardi.
“Medical experts now acknowledge that lockdowns don’t work….Now none of that makes any sense until you open your mind to consider if there is another agenda at work.”
According to technocrat, Klaus Schwab, founder and Chairman of the World Economic Forum, “COVID 19 cases have shown us that our old systems are not fit anymore for the 21st century, it has laid bare a fundamental lack of social cohesion, fairness, inclusion and equality.”
“Now is the historical moment of time not only to fight the … virus but to shape the system … for the post-corona era,” claims Schwab.
“(Mr Schwab) admits that COVID is the new excuse to usher in the Green New Deal that climate alarmists, profiteers and big government have been pushing for years,” said Bernardi.
Researchers Blast ‘Dangerous’ COVID-19 Herd Immunity Strategy – MedPage
Any so-called “herd immunity” strategy based on letting coronavirus infections spread unchecked is not only dangerous, but completely unsupported by scientific evidence, said researchers in an open letter to The Lancet.
Not only is there no proof of lasting immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection, but the strategy would place an unacceptable burden on healthcare workers, as well as the economy, wrote Deepti Gurdasani, MD, PhD, of Queen Mary University of London, who was joined by more than 80 researchers.
“Such an approach also risks further exacerbating the socioeconomic inequities and structural discriminations already laid bare by the pandemic,” the authors wrote in the letter, titled “Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Long dismissed by public health officials as untenable, herd immunity through natural infection gained traction recently, thanks to a call by Trump administration officials promoting the strategy as described in the “Great Barrington Declaration.” The document argues against lockdowns and for full reopenings, including mass gatherings and total in-person work and school, while “the vulnerable,” who were not defined, are the only ones who need to stay at home.
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the HIV Medicine Association (HIVMA) already “strongly denounced” the herd immunity strategy, saying it comes “without data or evidence.”
“To assert that stepping away from the vigilance needed to control the spread of this novel coronavirus and that abdication of efforts to control a pandemic that has overwhelmed health systems worldwide is a ‘compassionate approach’ is profoundly misleading,” said IDSA president Thomas File, MD, and HIVMA chair Judith Feinberg, MD, in a statement.
[editor’s note: also read Fauci blasts herd immunity proposal embraced by White House as ‘total nonsense’]
Sharp Rise In Drug Overdose Deaths Seen During 1st Few Months Of Pandemic – NPR
Drug overdose deaths rose in the first three months of this year, according to preliminary numbers released Wednesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The data, showing a roughly 10% increase in fatalities, offer a first official snapshot of the pandemic’s impact on Americans suffering addiction.
If this trend continues, the CDC estimates the U.S. will suffer more than 75,500 drug-related deaths in 2020, setting a bleak record for a second year in a row.
This wasn’t unexpected. Federal officials warned over the summer they were seeing increases in drug use nationwide as the coronavirus spread.
The crisis also limited the ability of many addiction treatment programs to provide services.
“Every indication we have in terms of stress, in terms of surveys about increasing [drug] use during the pandemic, basically everything is pointed in the wrong direction,” said Adm. Brett Giroir, assistant secretary for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services during a webcast in August.
SARS-CoV-2 Worsens Outcomes in Cancer Patients – Medscape
Outcomes are worse in patients with cancer who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than in those who test negative, according to a study of US Veterans Affairs electronic health records.
Patients with cancer seem to be at higher risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2, and some studies have reported increased COVID-19-related mortality in cancer patients.
Dr. Nikhil C. Munshi from VA Boston Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts and colleagues used data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, the repository for EHR data for patients seen at VA facilities nationwide, to evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of COVID-19 infection among 22,914 patients with a history of cancer who were tested for SARS-CoV-2.
Overall, 7.8% of these cancer patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, with significantly higher positivity rates among African Americans (15.0%) versus White patients (5.5%) and among Hispanic/Latino patients (10.9%) versus non-Hispanic/Latino patients (7.7%).
“The real prevalence of COVID-19 remains uncertain,” the authors note, “as a substantial number of patients are not or have not been tested, particularly in the context of asymptomatic disease.”
Extroverts Are Less Likely to Follow COVID Restrictions, Scientists Say – Newsweek
Extroverts are less likely to follow stay-at-home guidance and rules to prevent the spread of COVID-19 than others, according to research.
The study, published in the journal American Psychologist, involved over 100,000 people across dozens of countries. It found those who scored highly for the traits of openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and neuroticism were more likely to shelter-in-place when mandated or advised to by officials. Extroverts, however, were less likely to stay at home.
The participants answered questions that meant researchers could categorize them according to what are known as the Big Five personality traits: extraversion, openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and neuroticism. They also ranked how much they had followed stay at home in the past week, and assessed laws and guidance in countries during that period.
The team found that people were more likely to shelter in place if they were required to by governments. Co-author Andrés Gvirtz, a PhD candidate in the Department of Psychology at the University of Cambridge, told Newsweek via email “for the most part, we believe our findings made intuitive sense.”
“We also found that more agreeable (i.e., cooperative, compliant, sympathetic), conscientious (i.e., responsible, reliable, practical) and neurotic (i.e., tense, anxious, emotionally unstable) people were more likely to shelter-in-place,” he said.
Trump says he is now immune. Not so fast, experts warn. – New York Times
President Trump might want to wait a bit before he puts on a Superman T-shirt.
After recovering from Covid-19, the president declared that he was now immune to the disease caused by the coronavirus, and was said to have talked about wearing a superhero shirt under his dress shirt.
But if Mr. Trump is in fact now immune to the virus, he may not remain so, scientists warn. That’s because the treatment he received may have prevented his body from making the antibodies necessary for long-term protection.
The experimental monoclonal antibodies Mr. Trump was given are synthetic, and they will most likely wane in a matter of weeks. Indeed, unless they are replenished, Mr. Trump may be left more susceptible to the virus than most patients who had Covid-19 and recovered, several experts warned.
There is another wrinkle for the president.
In addition to the monoclonal antibodies he was given, Mr. Trump also received steroid treatment. That suppresses the body’s natural immune response — including the production of antibodies of its own.
“He may be not protected the second time around, especially because he didn’t develop his own antibodies,” said Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist at Yale University.
Vaccine scientist says increase in Covid-19 is a “very ominous sign” – CNN
Dr. Peter Hotez, a vaccine scientist and dean of tropical medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, says he is “very worried” as coronavirus cases continue to rise in the United States.
“We are now about to exceed 60,000 new cases a day, so we are looking at a doubling of new cases a day over just the last few weeks. This is a very ominous sign. I think we are in for a pretty bad fall and winter,” Hotez said in an interview on CNN.
“This is not a time for rallies. This is not a time for…crowding a lot of people together, especially speaking loudly and cheering, which is releasing virus. This is the time when we could be entering one of the worst periods of our epidemic and one of the worst periods in modern American public health. I’m very worried for the nation,” he added.
The following are foreign headlines with hyperlinks to the posts
France declares public health state of emergency over COVID-19
A study in Nature Medicine identified Belgium, Italy, Scotland, Spain, and England and Wales as the countries with the most excess deaths during the pandemic.
More than 60 coronavirus infections were linked to a Canadian spin studio [gym] that followed all public health guidelines.
London And Other English Cities Declared To Be At High Alert For COVID-19
London residents from different households will no longer be able to congregate indoors as part of the United Kingdom capital’s Tier 2 lockdown.
Paris Under Curfew: Europe Reacts As Countries See Highest-Ever Coronavirus Numbers
Over 800,000 Lives Could Be Saved if Everyone in the World Wore Masks
Partial Lockdowns Return to Europe As COVID Cases Rise 40 Percent in a Week
In India, doctors warn that deteriorating air quality could make Covid-19 even worse.
Singapore and Hong Kong agree to set up a travel bubble, and other news from around the world.
A W.H.O. official urges tighter restrictions in Europe, and London will face new limits.
Scientists at Oxford University say they developed a Covid-19 test able to identify the virus in less than five minutes
Ryanair blames European ‘mismanagement’ for winter cuts
India crosses 7.3 million mark with 67,708 new cases
The following are additional national and state headlines with hyperlinks to the posts
Moderna vaccine trial could have efficacy data next month
Barron Trump Tested Positive For Coronavirus, But Now Negative
Wife of Trump’s labor secretary, who was at Barrett Rose Garden event, tests positive for Covid-19
Adding to the latest coronavirus surge in college football, University of Alabama head coach Nick Saban tested positive.
University of Cincinnati football game at Tulsa postponed because of COVID-19 cases
Kamala Harris Halts Travel as Staffers Test Positive for COVID-19
Atlanta Falcons Shut down Training Facility after Positive COVID-19 Test
Uncertainty around the pandemic and the election is fueling a run on guns.
Wells Fargo Fires More Than 100 Employees For Alleged Coronavirus Relief Fraud
Watchdog to audit Pentagon’s use of COVID-19 funds on defense contractors
Fauci calls on Americans to evaluate ‘risk-benefit’ of Thanksgiving gatherings
Trump says he is tested ‘a lot,’ but not daily, for coronavirus
Chinese Virologist Who Claims COVID Lab-Made Says Facebook Scared of Facts
Alabama Coach Nick Saban Tests Positive for COVID-19
Freshman enrollment drops significantly at U.S. universities and community colleges.
Used cars are in such demand right now as consumers rethink car needs in the new Covid-19 normal that inventory is moving at record pace and prices are rising, a rare phenomenon in the market.
Airborne spread has made filtration systems more popular than ‘toilet paper in April’
Today’s Posts On Econintersect Showing Impact Of The Pandemic With Hyperlinks
10 October 2020 New York Fed Weekly Economic Index (WEI): Index Improves
October 2020 Philly Fed Manufacturing Survey Index Significantly Improved
October 2020 Empire State Manufacturing Index Declined
September 2020 Import Year-over-Year Inflation Now -1.1%
10 October 2020 Initial Unemployment Claims Worsen
Coronavirus: How To Make The Three-Tier Lockdown Work
Three Ways To Get Your Point Across While Wearing A Mask Tips From An Award-Winning Speech Coach
Warning to Readers
The amount of politically biased articles on the internet continues to increase. And studies and opinions of the experts continue to contradict other studies and expert opinions. Honestly, it is difficult to believe anything anymore. A study usually cannot establish cause and effect – but only correlation. Be very careful what you believe about this pandemic.
I assemble this coronavirus update daily – sifting through the posts on the internet. I try to avoid politically slanted posts (mostly from CNN, New York Times, and the Washington Post) and can usually find unslanted posts on that subject from other sources on the internet. I wait to publish posts on subjects that I cannot validate across several sources. But after all this extra work, I do not know if I have conveyed the REAL facts. It is my job to provide information so that you have the facts necessary – and then it is up to readers to draw conclusions.
Coronavirus INTERACTIVE Charts
include($_SERVER[‘DOCUMENT_ROOT’].’/pages/coronavirus.htm’); ?>
Analyst Opinion of Coronavirus Data
There are several takeaways that need to be understood when viewing coronavirus statistical data:
- The global counts are suspect for a variety of reasons including political. Even the U.S. count has issues as it is possible that as much as half the population has had coronavirus and was asymptomatic. It would be a far better metric using a random sampling of the population weekly. In short, we do not understand the size of the error in the tracking numbers.
- Just because some of the methodology used in aggregating the data in the U.S. is flawed – as long as the flaw is uniformly applied – you establish a baseline. This is why it is dangerous to compare two countries as they likely use different methodologies to determine who has (and who died) from coronavirus.
- COVID-19 and the flu are different but can have similar symptoms. For sure, COVID-19 so far is much more deadly than the flu. [click here to compare symptoms]
- From an industrial engineering point of view, one can argue that it is best to flatten the curve only to the point that the health care system is barely able to cope. This solution only works if-and-only-if one can catch this coronavirus once and develops immunity. In the case of COVID-19, herd immunity may need to be in the 80% to 85% range. WHO warns that few have developed antibodies to COVID-19. At this point, herd immunity does not look like an option although there is now a discussion of whether T-Cells play a part in immunity [which means one might have immunity without antibodies]
- Older population countries will have a higher death rate.
- There are at least 8 strains of the coronavirus. New York may have a deadlier strain imported from Europe, compared to less deadly viruses elsewhere in the United States.
- Each publication uses different cutoff times for its coronavirus statistics. Our data uses 11:00 am London time. Also, there is an unexplained variation in the total numbers both globally and in the U.S.
- The real question remains if the U.S. is over-reacting to this virus. The following graphic from the CDC puts the annual flu burden in perspective [click on image to enlarge]. Note that using this data is dangerous as the actual flu cases are estimated and not counted – nobody knows how accurate these guesses are.
What we do not know about the coronavirus [actually there is little scientifically proven information]. Most of our knowledge is anecdotal, from studies with limited subjects, or from studies without peer review.
- How many people have been infected as many do not show symptoms?
- Masks do work.
- Do we develop lasting immunity to the coronavirus? Another coronavirus – the simple cold – does not develop long term immunity.
- To what degree do people who never develop symptoms contribute to transmission?
- The US has scaled up coronavirus testing – and the accuracy of the tests has been improving. However, if one loses immunity – the coronavirus testing value is reduced.
- Can children widely spread coronavirus? [current thinking is that they are becoming a major source of the pandemic spread]
- Why have some places avoided big coronavirus outbreaks – and others hit hard?
- What effect will the weather have? At this point, it does not seem hot weather slows this coronavirus down – and it seems air conditioning contributes to its spread.
- Outdoor activities seem to be a lower risk than indoor activities.
- Can the world really push out an effective vaccine in 12 to 18 months?
- Will other medical treatments for Covid-19 ease symptoms and reduce deaths? So far only one drug (remdesivir) is approved for treatment.
- A current scientific understanding of the way the coronavirus works can be found [here].
Heavy breakouts of coronavirus have hit farm workers. Farmworkers are essential to the food supply. They cannot shelter at home. Consider:
- they have high rates of the respiratory disease [occupational hazard]
- they travel on crowded buses chartered by their employers
- few have health insurance
- they cannot social distance and live two to four to a room – and they eat together
- some reports say half are undocumented
- they are low paid and cannot afford not to work – so they will go to work sick
- they do not have access to sanitation when working
- a coronavirus outbreak among farmworkers can potentially shutter entire farm
The bottom line is that COVID-19 so far has been shown to be much more deadly than the data on the flu. Using CDC data, the flu has a mortality rate between 0.06 % and 0.11 % Vs. the coronavirus which to date has a mortality rate of 4 % [the 4% is the average of overall statistics – however in the last few months it has been hovering around 1.0%] – which makes it between 10 and 80 times more deadly. The reason for ranges:
Because influenza surveillance does not capture all cases of flu that occur in the U.S., CDC provides these estimated ranges to better reflect the larger burden of influenza.
There will be a commission set up after this pandemic ends to find fault [it is easy to find fault when a once-in-a-lifetime event occurs] and to produce recommendations for the next time a pandemic happens. Those that hate President Trump will conclude the virus is his fault.
Resources:
- Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov .
- Get the latest research from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus.
- Find NCBI SARS-CoV-2 literature, sequence, and clinical content: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/.
- List of studies: https://icite.od.nih.gov/covid19/search/#search:searchId=5ee124ed70bb967c49672dad
include(“/home/aleta/public_html/files/ad_openx.htm”); ?>