Written by Steven Hansen
The headlines say seasonally adjusted Industrial Production (IP) improved month-over-month – but no shows no growth year-over-year. Our analysis shows the three-month rolling average improved.
Analyst Opinion of Industrial Production
The best way to view this is the 3-month rolling averages which improved. The improvement this month was due to higher utility demand.
Industrial production rose 0.6 percent in February after falling 0.5 percent in January. Manufacturing output edged up 0.1 percent in February; excluding a large gain for motor vehicles and parts and a large drop for civilian aircraft, factory output was unchanged. The index for mining declined 1.5 percent, but the index for utilities jumped 7.1 percent, as temperatures returned to more typical levels following an unseasonably warm January. At 109.6 percent of its 2012 average, the level of total industrial production in February was unchanged from a year earlier. Capacity utilization for the industrial sector increased 0.4 percentage point in February to 77.0 percent, a rate that is 2.8 percentage points below its long-run (1972-2019) average.
Note that manufacturing is in contraction year-over-year – and capacity utilization remained in expansion year-over-year.
Consider this report marginally better than last month.
The rate of year-over-year growth for manufacturing employment and manufacturing production correlates.
- The headline seasonally adjusted Industrial Production (IP) was up 0.6 % month-over-month and up 0.0 % year-over-year (YoY was published as -0.8 % last month).
- Econintersect‘s analysis using the unadjusted data is that IP growth showed an acceleration in the rate of growth of 1.3 % month-over-month, and is up 0.1 % year-over-year.
- The unadjusted 3-month rolling average year-over-year rate of growth accelerated by 0.2 % from last month and is down 0.6% year-over-year.
- The market was expecting (from Econoday):
| Headline Seasonally Adjusted | Consensus Range | Consensus | Actual |
| IP (month over month change) | -0.4 % to 0.7 % | +0.4 % | +0.6 % |
| IP Subindex Manufacturing (month over month change) | -0.5 % to 0.5 % | +0.1 % | +0.1 % |
| Capacity Utilization | 76.5 % to 77.5 % | 77.0 % | 77.0 % |
IP headline index has three parts – manufacturing, mining, and utilities – manufacturing was up 0.1 % this month (contracting 0.4 % year-over-year), mining down 1.5 % (up 2.1 % year-over-year), and utilities were up 0.4 % (up 0.4 % year-over-year). Note that utilities are 10.4 % of the industrial production index, whilst mining is 14.6 %.
Comparing Seasonally Adjusted Year-over-Year Change of the Industrial Production Index (blue line) with Components Manufacturing (red line), Utilities (green line), and Mining (orange line)
Unadjusted Industrial Production year-over-year growth has been declining since mid-2018.
Economic downturns have been signaled by only watching the manufacturing portion of Industrial Production. Historically manufacturing year-over-year growth has been negative when a recession is imminent.
Seasonally Adjusted Manufacturing Index of Industrial Production – Year-over-Year Growth
Seasonally Adjusted Capacity Utilization – Year-over-Year Change – Seasonally Adjusted – Total Industry (blue line) and Manufacturing Only (red line)
Econintersect uses unadjusted data and graphs the data YoY in monthly groups.
Summary of all Federal Reserve Districts Manufacturing:
Holding this and other survey’s Econintersect follows accountable for their predictions, the following graph compares the hard data from Industrial Products manufacturing subindex (dark blue bar) and US Census manufacturing shipments (red bar) to the Dallas Fed survey (light blue bar).
In the above graphic, hard data is the long bars, and surveys are the short bars. The arrows on the left side are the key to growth or contraction.
Caveats in the Use of Industrial Production Index
Industrial Production is a non-monetary index – and therefore inflation or other monetary adjustments are not necessary. The monthly index values are normally revised many months after initial release and are subject to annual revision. The following graphic is an example of the variance between the originally released value – and the current value of the index. If the current values are better than the original values – this is normally a sign of an improving economy.
This index is somewhat distorted by including utility production which is noisy, based primarily on weather variations. There is some variance between the manufacturing component of industrial production which monitors production, and the US Census reported Manufacturing Sales. While it is true that these are slightly different pulse points (inventory not accounted in shipments) – they should not have different trends for long periods of time.
Comparing Year-over-Year Change – Unadjusted Manufacturing Industrial Production (blue line) to Unadjusted Manufacturers Shipments (green line)
Econintersect determines the month-over-month change by subtracting the current month’s year-over-year change from the previous month’s year-over-year change. This is the best of the bad options available to determine month-over-month trends – as the preferred methodology would be to use multi-year data (but New Normal effects and the Great Recession distort historical data).
include(“/home/aleta/public_html/files/ad_openx.htm”); ?>
