Written by Steven Hansen
The BLS job situation headlines showed a second month of tremendous jobs growth. Unfortunately the unadjusted numbers were much uglier – this is the largest discrepancy seen recently between the adjusted and unadjusted data. Economic intuitive sectors were positive.
- The rate of growth for employment accelerated this month (red line on graph below). This is a year-over-year analysis which has no seasonality issues.
Unadjusted Non-Farm Private Employment – Year-over-Year Change (blue bars – left axis) and Year-over-Year Growth Acceleration / Deceleration From Previous Month (red line – right axis)
z bls2.png
- The unadjusted jobs increase month-over-month about average for times of economic expansion.
- Economic intuitive sectors of employment were positive.
- This month’s report internals (comparing household to establishment data sets) was inconsistent with the household survey showing seasonally adjusted employment improving 420,000 vs the headline establishment number of growing 255,000. The point here is that part of the headlines are from the household survey (such as the unemployment rate) and part is from the establishment survey (job growth). From a survey control point of view – the common element is jobs growth – and if they do not match, your confidence in either survey is diminished. [note that the household survey includes ALL jobs growth, not just non-farm).
- The household survey added 407,000 people to the workforce.
- The NFIB statement on jobs growth this month is at the end of this post.
A summary of the employment situation:
- BLS reported: 255K (non-farm) and 217K (non-farm private). Unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.9 %.
- ADP reported: 179 K (non-farm private)
- In Econintersect‘s July 2016 economic forecast released in late June, we estimated non-farm private payroll growth at 105,000 (based on economic potential) and 150,000 (fudged based on current overrun of economic potential);
- The market expected (from Bloomberg):
Seasonally Adjusted Data | Consensus Range | Consensus | Actual | |
Nonfarm Payrolls – M/M change | 150,000 to 215,000 | 185,000 | 255,000 | |
Unemployment Rate – Level | 4.8 % to 4.9 % | 4.8 % | 4.9 % | |
Private Payrolls – M/M change | 145,000 to 210,000 | 175,000 | 217,000 | |
Average Hourly Earnings – M/M change | 0.2 % to 0.3 % | 0.3 % | +0.3 % | |
Av Workweek – All Employees |
| 34.4 hrs | 34.5 hrs |
The BLS reports seasonally adjusted data – manipulated with multiple seasonal adjustment factors, and Econintersect believes the unadjusted data gives a clearer picture of the jobs situation.
Non-seasonally adjusted non-farm payrolls improved 85,000 – about average in times of economic expansion.
Historical Unadjusted Private Non-Farm Jobs Growth Between Junes and Julys (Table B-1, data in thousands) – unadjusted (blue line) vs seasonally adjusted (red line)
bls non-adjusted change.PNG
Last month’s unadjusted employment gains were revised downward.
Change in Seasonally Adjusted Non-Farm Payrolls Between Originally Reported (blue bars) and Current Estimates (red bars)
z bls1.png
Most of the analysis below uses unadjusted data, and presents an alternative view to the headline data.
Unemployment
The BLS reported U-3 (headline) unemployment was 4.9 % with the U-6 “all in” unemployment rate (including those working part time who want a full time job) degraded 0.1% to 9.7 %. These numbers are volatile as they are created from the household survey.
BLS U-3 Headline Unemployment (red line, left axis), U-6 All In Unemployment (blue line, left axis), and Median Duration of Unemployment (green line, right axis)
Econintersect has an interpretation of employment supply slack using the BLS employment-population ratio, demonstrated by the graph below. The employment-population ratio improved 0.1 to 59.7.
Employment-Population Ratio
The jobs picture – when the employment / population as a whole – has been on an uptrend since mid-2011. This ratio is determined by household survey.
- Econintersect uses employment-populations ratios to monitor the jobless situation. The headline unemployment number requires the BLS to guess at the size of the workforce, then guess again who is employed or not employed. In employment – population ratios, the population is a given and the guess is who is employed.
- This ratio has been in a general uptrend since the beginning of 2014. The employment-population ratio tells you the percent of the population with a job. Each 0.1% increment represents approximately 300,000 jobs. [Note: these are seasonally adjusted numbers – and we are relying on the BLS to get this seasonal adjustment factor correct]. An unchanged ratio would be telling you that jobs growth was around 150,000 – as this is approximately the new entries to the labor market caused by population growth.
Employment Metrics
The growth trend in the establishment survey’s non-farm payroll year-over-year growth rate was trending up beginning of 2014 but has been trending down beginning in 2015. This month there was a decline.
Unadjusted Non-Farm Payrolls Year-over-Year Growth
Another way to view employment is to watch the total hours worked.
Percent Change Year-over-Year Non-Farm Private Weekly Hours Worked
The bullets below use seasonally adjusted data from the establishment survey except where indicated:
- Average hours worked (table B-2) improved 0.1 to 34.5. A rising number normally indicates an expanding economy .
- Government employment grew 38,000 (38K) with the Federal Government up 3K, state governments up 5K and local governments up 30K.
- The big contributor to employment growth this month was health care and social assistance (48.8K).
- Manufacturing was up 9K, and construction was up 14K.
- The unemployment rate (from household survey) for people between 20 and 24 (Table A-10) degraded from 8.7% to 9.0%. This number is produced by survey and is very volatile.
- Average hourly earnings (Table B-3) was up $0.08 to $25.69.
Private Employment: Average Hourly Earnings
Economic Metrics
Economic markers used to benchmark economic growth (all from the establishment survey).
The truck employment was up 1.7K.
Truck Transport Employment – Year-over-Year Change
Temporary help grew 17.0K.
Temporary Help Employment – Year-over-Year Change
Econintersect believes the transport sector is a forward indicator. Others look at temporary help as a forward indicator.
Food for Thought
Who are the victims in this mediocre employment situation. It is not people over 55.
Index of Employment Levels – 55 and up (blue line), 45 to 54 (red line), 35 to 44 (green line), 25 to 34 (purple line), 20 to 24 (light blue line), and 16 to 19 (orange line)
Women are doing better than men.
Index of Employment Levels – Men (blue line) vs Women (red line)
Mom and Pop employment remains below recessionary levels.
The less education one has, the less chance of finding a job.
Index of Employment Levels – University graduate (blue line), Some college or AA degree (orange line), high school graduates (green line), and high school dropouts (red line)
Here is an indexed view of employment levels.
Index of Employment Levels (from the BLS Establishment Survey) – Hispanic (blue line), African American (red line), and White (green line)
However, keep in mind that population growth is different for each group. Here is a look at employment to population ratios which clearly shows NO group has recovered from the Great Recession:
Employment / Population Ratios (from the BLS Household Survey) – Hispanic (blue line), African American (red line), and White (green line)
NFIB comment on this Month’s BLS Job Situation
NFIB issued the following statement on employment this month:
The small business employment outlook changed little in July as job creation remained flat and business owners struggled to find qualified workers for open positions, according to the Jobs Report released today by the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB).
“There was little change in small business owner employment activity from June to July,” said NFIB Chief Economist William C. Dunkelberg. “This is consistent with the second quarter GDP growth of 1.2 percent. Policymakers need to keep in mind that without a robust small business sector, the economy will continue to grow at a sluggish pace.”
Job creation among small firms was negative for the second straight month, according to the report. On the bright side, slightly more owners this month said they plan to create jobs in the future.
Compensation levels increased marginally, a sign that owners are trying to find and retain good employees. In fact, small business owners say that finding qualified workers is one of their most important business problems.
NFIB President and CEO Juanita Duggan said that a surge in new government regulations is discouraging small business owners from making long-term financial investments, including new employees.
“The explosion of new regulations is a ball and chain for small business,” said Duggan. “Federal agencies have been churning out new mandates at a dizzying pace, and that creates more risk and uncertainty for small business owners. The regulatory climate is suffocating small business investment and hiring.”
Caveat on the use of BLS Jobs Data
The monthly headline data ends up being significantly revised for months after the initial release – and is subject also to annual revisions. The question remains how seriously can you take the data when first released.
Econintersect Contributor Jeff Miller has the following description of BLS methodology:
- An initial report of a survey of establishments. Even if the survey sample was perfect (and we all know that it is not) and the response rate was 100% (which it is not) the sampling error alone for a 90% confidence interval is +/- 100K jobs.
- The report is revised to reflect additional responses over the next two months.
- There is an adjustment to account for job creation — much maligned and misunderstood by nearly everyone.
- The final data are benchmarked against the state employment data every year. This usually shows that the overall process was very good, but it led to major downward adjustments at the time of the recession. More recently, the BLS estimates have been too low.
ADP (blue line) versus BLS (red line) – Monthly Jobs Growth Comparison
However, there is some discussion that neither the ADP nor BLS numbers are correct – as both are derived by a sampling methodology. The answer could be that there is no correct answer in real time – and that it is best to look at the trends. As has been noted, all eventually end up correlating.
The BLS uses seasonal adjusted data for its headline numbers. The seasonally adjusted employment data is produced by an algorithm. The following graph which shows unadjusted job growth – seasonal adjustments spread employment growth over the entire year. Employment does not really grow in the second half of the year and always falls significantly in January.
Non-Seasonally Adjusted Employment – Private Sector
There is the proverbial question on what is minimal jobs growth each month required to allow for new entrants to the market. Depending on mindset, this answer varies. According to Investopdia, the number is between 100,000 and 150,000. The Wall Street Journal is citing 125K. Mark Zandi said 150K. Econintersect is going with Mark Zandi’s number:
- In Econintersect‘s June 2014 economic forecast released in late May, we estimated non-farm payroll growth at 160,000 (unadjusted based on economic potential) and 229,000 (fudged based on current overrun of economic potential).
- If Econintersect uses employment – population ratios, the correct number would be the number where this ratio improved. Using the graph below, the ratio began to improve starting a little after mid-year. This corresponds to the period where the 12 month rolling average of job gains hit 150,000.
Employment to Population Ratio
Note: The ratio could be fine tuned by adjusting to the ratio of employment to working age population rather than the total population. However, this would not change the big picture that an increase of somewhere around 150,000 (+/-) is needed for the growing population numbers. We have estimated 140k – 160k. The number might possibly be within the range 125k – 175k. Econintersect cannot find reason to support the estimates below 125k.
The question of how changing demographics impact the employment numbers is at the margins of analysis. Econintersect will publish more on this fine tuning going forward, both in-house research and the work of others.
include(“/home/aleta/public_html/files/ad_openx.htm”); ?>