econintersect.com
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자
No Result
View All Result
econintersect.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Which Side Of This Trade Would You Have Been On?

admin by admin
9월 6, 2021
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

by Sam Seiden, Online Trading Academy

Online Trading Academy Article of the Week

The chart below is an income trade in the S&P that I took on 5/31/17. The S&P declined into one of my strong demand zones and then proceeded to rally for a couple days. As you can see on the chart below, I followed the simple rules I have been sharing and bought near the low, into a clear demand zone where banks were buying also.


Please share this article – Go to very top of page, right hand side for social media buttons.


Then, I took a profit of $1,200 when price reached my target (blue circle). What surprised me was seeing many traders sell short in that red circle area, when price broke below those prior pivot lows. Watching the markets, I saw this happening and know why it happens so I wanted to talk about it here to help others not make this novice mistake.

People who shorted the S&P just below that 2408 level (red line) did so because conventional technical analysis rules tell them to short there. Bearish engulfing candles and a break of pivot lows is a clear sell signal for traders to follow the rules of technical analysis. The reason you don’t see people making a consistent low risk living from the markets with this school of thought is because there is a major flaw in it. The flaw is that all the chart patterns, indicators, oscillators and so on never take one thing into consideration – where are the buy orders (demand) and sell orders (supply). Yes, believe it or not, conventional technical analysis which is what dominates the trading/investing books and the internet IGNORES the only thing that matters when making a proper buy and sell decision, demand and supply! In the S&P here, this group was selling just above a price point where banks, and I, were buying, which is a very novice mistake.

S&P Income Trade 5/31/17 – Profit: $1,200.00

Example of a shorting trade.

It’s simply a matter of how you “think the markets” that separates those who make a living in the markets from those who don’t. To be successful at trading and investing, you must focus on what is real, not what you feel. What’s real is that price movement in any and all markets is a simple function of an ongoing supply and demand relationship. Prices turn at levels where this simple and straight forward equation is out of balance, like my demand zone and entry into the S&P trade. There are only two groups at play in the markets, those who achieve consistent profits and those who provide those profits. So, before you put your hard – earned money at risk in the markets, make sure your trading and investing strategy is reality based and focused on how you make money buying and selling anything in life. This is the key financial mindset that allows you to produce the income and wealth needed to start living the life you choose to live.

For more articles, videos, trading and investing ideas, follow me on Facebook.

Hope this was helpful, have a great day.

Previous Post

Fact Check: Is China Dumping Steel?

Next Post

There’s A City In My Mind …

Related Posts

Scammers Steal $300K Using Fake Blur Airdrop Websites
Uncategorized

FBI Warns Investors Of Crypto-Stealing Play-to-Earn Games

by admin
Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites
Uncategorized

Maersk Almost Completing Russia Exit After The Sale Of Logistics Sites

by admin
Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle
Uncategorized

Why Is ‘Staking’ At The Center Of Crypto’s Latest Regulation Scuffle

by admin
Mexico's Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields
Uncategorized

Mexico’s Pemex Dismantled Resources Worth $342M From Two Top Fields

by admin
Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future
Uncategorized

Oil Giant Schlumberger Rebrands Itself As SLB For Low-Carbon Future

by admin
Next Post

What, Me Worry?

답글 남기기 응답 취소

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin market blockchain BTC BTC price business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect

No Result
View All Result
  • 토토사이트
    • 카지노사이트
    • 도박사이트
    • 룰렛 사이트
    • 라이브카지노
    • 바카라사이트
    • 안전카지노
  • 경제
  • 파이낸스
  • 정치
  • 투자

© Copyright 2024 EconIntersect