Global Economic Intersection
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Investments
    • Invest in Amazon $250
  • Cryptocurrency
    • Best Bitcoin Accounts
    • Bitcoin Robot
      • Quantum AI
      • Bitcoin Era
      • Bitcoin Aussie System
      • Bitcoin Profit
      • Bitcoin Code
      • eKrona Cryptocurrency
      • Bitcoin Up
      • Bitcoin Prime
      • Yuan Pay Group
      • Immediate Profit
      • BitQH
      • Bitcoin Loophole
      • Crypto Boom
      • Bitcoin Treasure
      • Bitcoin Lucro
      • Bitcoin System
      • Oil Profit
      • The News Spy
      • Bitcoin Buyer
      • Bitcoin Inform
      • Immediate Edge
      • Bitcoin Evolution
      • Cryptohopper
      • Ethereum Trader
      • BitQL
      • Quantum Code
      • Bitcoin Revolution
      • British Trade Platform
      • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Reddit
    • Celebrities
      • Dr. Chris Brown Bitcoin
      • Teeka Tiwari Bitcoin
      • Russell Brand Bitcoin
      • Holly Willoughby Bitcoin
No Result
View All Result
Global Economic Intersection
No Result
View All Result

Food Prices and Inflation in China and the U.S. Are Following Similar Paths

admin by admin
October 19, 2014
in Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

by Maria A. Arias and Yi Wen, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Inflation, as measured by growth in the consumer price index (CPI), has been relatively stable during the past two years in both the U.S. and China. Both countries also shared a period of price volatility in the years before and after the Great Recession—a time when commodity prices were fluctuating around the globe. Before 2000, however, prices in China and the U.S. did not always behave similarly. (See Figure 1 below)


Figure 1

CPI Inflation

CPI Inflation

SOURCES: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED).

Food prices, an important component in the CPI, can help explain the relationship between the two countries’ overall price co-movements. Fluctuations in food prices in China started to become more strongly correlated to those in the U.S. after China joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001. Between 1994 and 2001, the correlation [1] was 41 percent; between 2002 and 2013, it rose to 62 percent. (See Figure 2 and the table.)

Figure 2

Food Price Growth

Food Price Growth

SOURCES: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED).

Table – Selected Correlations

Food Prices in
U.S. and China
CPI in U.S.
and China
International Soybean Prices
U.S. Food PricesChina Food PricesWorld Food
Prices
1994-20010.410.240.250.140.45
2002-20130.620.570.380.650.76

 

SOURCES: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, International Monetary Fund, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) and Haver Analytics.

NOTE: The first two columns in the table show the correlation in food price fluctuations, as well as that of CPI inflation, in both countries (columns) during the respective periods (rows). Likewise, the right-hand side of the table shows the correlation between international soybean prices and food prices in each of the three regions during the respective periods. (See endnote 1 for an explanation of correlation.)

But what drives the co-movement in food prices of the two countries? Are there explanations other than this co-movement for the increased synchronization of inflation in China and the U.S.? Let’s look at some possible answers to these questions.

World Food and Commodity Prices

Some people think that prices in general and food prices in particular are highly correlated in the U.S. and China because both sets of prices are affected by some worldwide factors, such as movements in world food prices. Data show that this is true for China, but not for the U.S.

China’s food prices were strongly correlated with world food prices between 2002 and 2013 (80 percent correlation), while U.S. food prices during the same period were not that highly correlated to world food prices (34 percent). Similarly, Chinese food prices were strongly and significantly correlated with the S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index between 2002 and 2013 (49 percent), while the correlation between U.S. food prices and the S&P GSCI was low (10 percent) and not statistically significant.

Exchange Rates and Money Supply

Looking at food prices from a monetary standpoint, another likely explanation could be related to currency exchange rates. China has a targeted floating exchange rate with the dollar; so, higher money supply in the U.S. should lead to higher money supply in China. If this were true, CPI inflation in China and the U.S. should fluctuate in similar patterns.[2]

The data are not conclusive regarding this explanation. The correlation between CPI inflation in the U.S. and China more than doubled, from 24 percent between 1994 and 2001 to 57 percent between 2002 and 2013. But the correlation between M1 money supply in the U.S. and China is negative, and it weakened from –59 percent between 1994 and 2001 to –28 percent between 2002 and 2013. Moreover, there has not been any significant shift in monetary and exchange rate policy toward closer policy coordination. If anything, China has relaxed the yuan’s link to the U.S. dollar in recent years.

Agricultural Trade Volumes

Given that the price correlations are markedly stronger after China joined the WTO, and since the other two possible explanations are not very conclusive, the structural change can likely be explained by the strong increase in trade, particularly agricultural trade, between China and the U.S. From 1991 until 2001, when China joined the WTO, agricultural exports from the U.S. to China grew 168 percent and agricultural imports grew 146 percent. During the 10 years after China joined the WTO, agricultural exports from the U.S. to China and imports from China to the U.S. grew 874 percent and 388 percent, respectively. (See Figure 3.)

Figure 3

Agricultural Trade between China and the U.S.

Ag Trade between China and U.S.

SOURCES: U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service.

In 2013 alone, about 18 percent of total U.S. agricultural exports went to China ($25.9 billion), including $13.4 billion in soybeans, $4.7 billion in grain and feed cereal, $3.7 billion in livestock and animal products, and $2.2 billion in cotton.

However, only about 4 percent of U.S. agricultural imports in 2013 came from China ($4.4 billion), including $1.7 billion in fruit and vegetable products, $0.6 billion in livestock and animal products, and $0.5 billion in grain and feed cereal, in addition to $2.7 billion of fish (which is considered a nonagricultural commodity).

Soybean trade is particularly interesting. International prices for soybeans are highly correlated with food prices around the world. The correlations strengthened after 2002 for China, the U.S. and the entire world.[3] (See the table.) Since the early 2000s, soybeans have accounted for 40 to 60 percent of U.S. agricultural exports to China, peaking at 70 percent in 2009. Soybeans drove most of the surge in agricultural trade between both countries after 2002.

Intersecting Needs

Agricultural trade between China and the U.S.—the two largest economies in the world—is substantial and has been increasing rapidly and steadily, making not only China’s food prices sensitive to those in the U.S., but also vice versa. Urbanization and higher incomes have helped shift Chinese people toward more protein-based diets, thus fueling demand for feed cereal and livestock and putting upward pressure on U.S. agricultural products. The heavy reliance by Americans on consumer goods from China may also make the U.S. cost of living sensitive to that in China, and Chinese production costs, especially wages, have been rising rapidly in recent years. Such developments can only imply stronger cross-country correlations in food prices and CPI inflation between the two countries.

Source: http://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/re/articles/?id=2560&utm_source=Email&utm_medium=SM&utm_campaign=Email#fig3a

Endnotes

  1. Correlation is a measure of the statistical relationship between two random variables. If they are perfectly synchronized in movements, the correlation is 1; if they have no relationship or similarities at all, then the correlation is 0.
  2. If the money supply in the U.S. increases, there is more money chasing the same amount of goods, putting upward pressure on U.S. prices. Therefore, China’s money supply has to increase in order to maintain the same exchange rate level, which should also lead to higher prices in China. Throughout this article, we use M1 money stock as a measure of the money supply; M1 includes notes and coins in circulation, traveler’s checks, demand deposits and checkable deposits.
  3. Even though U.S. food prices are not as highly correlated with international soybean prices, the correlation strengthened in the period after 2002.

Previous Post

Close Call for Mars

Next Post

Obamacare is Hurting More than 25% of Americans and Is Singling Out Republicans

Related Posts

Bitcoin Whales Invest Aggressively As Small Holders Divest
Economics

Bitcoin Whales Invest Aggressively As Small Holders Divest

by John Wanguba
June 7, 2023
Why Is The SEC Suing Binance?
Business

Why Is The SEC Suing Binance?

by John Wanguba
June 6, 2023
Bitcoin Has Been ‘Killed’ 474 Times But Its Still Alive And Kicking
Economics

Bitcoin Has Been ‘Killed’ 474 Times But Its Still Alive And Kicking

by John Wanguba
June 5, 2023
Japanese Regulators Issue Stern Warning To OpenAI For Data Collection
Business

Japanese Regulators Issue Stern Warning To OpenAI For Data Collection

by John Wanguba
June 5, 2023
What Are BRC-30 Tokens?
Econ Intersect News

What Are BRC-30 Tokens?

by John Wanguba
June 2, 2023
Next Post

Obamacare is Hurting More than 25% of Americans and Is Singling Out Republicans

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tags

adoption altcoins bank banking banks Binance Bitcoin Bitcoin adoption Bitcoin market blockchain BTC business China crypto crypto adoption cryptocurrency crypto exchange crypto market crypto regulation decentralized finance DeFi Elon Musk ETH Ethereum Europe Federal Reserve finance FTX inflation investment market analysis Metaverse NFT nonfungible tokens oil market price analysis recession regulation Russia stock market technology Tesla the UK the US Twitter

Archives

  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • August 2009

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized
Global Economic Intersection

After nearly 11 years of 24/7/365 operation, Global Economic Intersection co-founders Steven Hansen and John Lounsbury are retiring. The new owner, a global media company in London, is in the process of completing the set-up of Global Economic Intersection files in their system and publishing platform. The official website ownership transfer took place on 24 August.

Categories

  • Business
  • Econ Intersect News
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Bitcoin Whales Invest Aggressively As Small Holders Divest
  • Why Is The SEC Suing Binance?
  • Bitcoin Has Been ‘Killed’ 474 Times But Its Still Alive And Kicking

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Bitcoin Robot
    • Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Code
    • Quantum AI
    • eKrona Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Up
    • Bitcoin Prime
    • Yuan Pay Group
    • Immediate Profit
    • BitIQ
    • Bitcoin Loophole
    • Crypto Boom
    • Bitcoin Era
    • Bitcoin Treasure
    • Bitcoin Lucro
    • Bitcoin System
    • Oil Profit
    • The News Spy
    • British Bitcoin Profit
    • Bitcoin Trader
  • Bitcoin Reddit

© Copyright 2021 EconIntersect - Economic news, analysis and opinion.

en English
ar Arabicbg Bulgarianda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfi Finnishfr Frenchde Germanel Greekit Italianja Japaneselv Latvianno Norwegianpl Polishpt Portuguesero Romanianes Spanishsv Swedish