>

A Significant Reason Retail Sales do not Indicate Recovery

Editor’s note:  Two contributors have reviewed the advance retail sales data for January with two completely unrelated approaches.  They have come to similar conclusions for very different reasons.  Doug Short’s analysis is in this article and Steven Hansen’s is here.

The February 2011 Advance Monthly Sales for Retail Trade and Food Services Report for January was released this morning. Here is the opening paragraph of the report:

The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for January, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $381.6 billion, an increase of 0.3 percent (±0.5%)* from the previous month, and 7.8 percent (±0.7%) above January 2010. Total sales for the November 2010 through January 2011 period were up 7.6 percent (±0.5%) from the same period a year ago. The November to December 2010 percent change was revised from +0.6 percent (±0.5%) to +0.5 percent (±0.3%).

* The 90 percent confidence interval includes zero. The Census Bureau does not have sufficient statistical evidence to conclude that the actual change is different than zero.

The 0.3% number is disappointing. The Briefing.com consensus estimate was 0.5% and its own estimate was 0.7%.

The chart below shows the complete data series from 1992, when the U.S. Census Bureau began tracking the data. I’ve highlighted recessions and the approximate range of two major economic episodes that have impacted consumer attitudes. The Tech Crash that began in the spring of 2000 had little impact on consumption. The Financial Crisis of 2008 has had a major impact. The January retail sales take us in nominal terms a mere 0.4% above the previous high of November 2007.

Click on graphs for larger images.

Here is the same chart with two trendlines added. These are linear regressions computed with the Excel Growth function.

The green trendline is a regression through the entire data series. The latest sales figure is 8.1% below the green line end point.

The blue line is a regression through the end of 2007 and extrapolated to the present. Thus, the blue line excludes the impact of the Financial Crisis. The latest sales figure is 16.1% below the blue line end point.

We normally evaluate monthly data on a month-over-month or year-over-year basis. The January 0.3% increase over December and 7.8% over January 2010 look reasonable, if somewhat disappointing. But a snapshot of the larger historical context illustrates the devastating impact of the Financial Crisis on the U.S. economy.

The “Real” Retail Story: We’re in a Depression Consumer Economy

The chart below is the one that tells us the most about the U.S. retail economy and the long-term behavior of the consumer. The sales numbers are adjusted for population growth and inflation.

Consider: During the past 21 years, the U.S. population has grown by over 22% while the dollar has lost about 37% of its purchasing power to inflation. When we adjust accordingly, the rebound in retail sales from the bottom in April 2009 merely gets us back to the per capita spending during the late summer of 1999.

Retail sales have been recovering since the trough in 2009. But the “real” consumer economy, adjusted for population growth still in a state of depression — 8.3% below its all-time high in January 2006.

Note 1: For the mathematically inclined, I’ve included a linear regression and a best-fit polynomial regression. The inflation-adjusted series is chained to the January 1992 dollar when this series began being reported.

Note 2:  Normalizing aggregate economic factors for population growth is something that has been proposed by Bob Bronson (see my previous discussion) and John Lounsbury (see Related Articles).

Related Articles

Retail Sales Growth Do Not Point to Economic Growth  by Steven Hansen

Population Growth and Economic Indicators  by Doug Short

Normalized GDP is the Real Growth  by John Lounsbury

Officially Out of Recovery and into Expansion – NOT  by John Lounsbury

Normalized Employment:  The Real Employment Story  by John Lounsbury (at Seeking Alpha)

Share this Econintersect Article:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Wikio
  • email
  • RSS
This entry was posted in Retail & Business Sales and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.










Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.





6 Responses to A Significant Reason Retail Sales do not Indicate Recovery

  1. Pingback: Strong Retail Sales Does Not Point to Real Economic Growth | Global Economic Intersection

  2. Pingback: CMI: Consumer Weakness Continues | Global Economic Intersection

  3. Pingback: Weekly Economic Scorecard 18 February 2011 | Global Economic Intersection

  4. demand side says:

    Very good. How could we expect otherwise with income growth going to the top cohorts and incomes stagnating for the rest of the population? With consumers already saturated in debt, it is hard to see where the purchaser in the purchase-sales transaction is going to come from.

  5. Pingback: Weighing the Economic News: Borders' Bankruptcy | Global Economic Intersection

  6. Pingback: Retail Sales are Up - Not Impacted by Fuel Costs | Global Economic Intersection