Productivity 4Q2013 (Preliminary): Productivity Up, Labor Costs Down

Written by

A simple summary of this release is that the rate of productivity growth is up , whilst the rate of growth of labor costs is contracting.

The headlines annualize quarterly results (Econintersect uses year-over-year change in our analysis). Based on preliminary data, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that non-farm business productivity increased at an annual rate of 3.2% in the fourth quarter of 2013. The market was expecting 2.4% to 2.5% productivity growth. However, if data is analyzed in year-over-year fashion, productivity was up 1.7% year-over-year.

Unit labor costs (non-farm business) decreased at an annual rate of 1.6% in the 3Q2013 (decreased 1.3% year-over-year) with the market expecting -0.5% to 0.0%.

Although one could argue that productivity improvement must be cost effective, it is not true that all cost improvement are productivity improvements.

Even though a decrease in productivity to the BLS could be considered an increase in productivity to an industrial engineer, this methodology does track recessions. The current levels are well above recession territory.

Seasonally Adjusted Year-over-Year Change in Output of Business Sector

But the output per person growth has been growing for 2013.

Seasonally Adjusted Year-over-Year Change of Output per Hour

All this is happening while costs per unit now is declining.

Seasonally Adjusted Year-over-Year Rate of Change of Unit Labor Costs

The headlines from the press release:

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity increased at a 3.2 percent annual rate during the fourth quarter of 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The increase in productivity reflects increases of 4.9 percent in output and 1.7 percent in hours worked. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) From the fourth quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2013, productivity increased 1.7 percent as output and hours worked rose 3.3 percent and 1.6 percent, respectively. (See chart 1 and table A.) Annual average productivity increased 0.6 percent from 2012 to 2013.

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked of all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers.

Unit labor costs in nonfarm businesses decreased 1.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2013, as the 3.2 percent increase in productivity was larger than a 1.5 percent increase in hourly compensation. Unit labor costs fell 1.3 percent over the last four quarters.

BLS defines unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity; increases in hourly compensation tend to increase unit labor costs and increases in output per hour tend to reduce them.

Manufacturing sector productivity increased 2.0 percent in the fourth quarter of 2013, as output and hours worked increased 6.6 percent and 4.4 percent, respectively. Productivity increased 3.4 percent in the durable goods sector and increased 1.0 percent in the nondurable goods sector. Over the last four quarters, manufacturing productivity increased 2.1 percent, as output increased 3.3 percent and hours increased 1.2 percent. Unit labor costs in manufacturing fell 1.0 percent in the fourth quarter of 2013 and declined 0.9 percent from the same quarter a year ago. Nonfinancial corporate sector productivity decreased 0.5 percent in the third quarter of 2013.

Caveats Relating to Productivity

Productivity is determined using monetary criteria, and does not recognize outsourced man hours – in other words, if a business cuts half of its workforce by outsourcing a sub-component or sub-service, this would be a 50% productivity improvement.

These productivity measures describe the relationship between real output and the labor time involved in its production. They show the changes from period to period in the amount of goods and services produced per hour. Although these measures relate output to hours at work of all persons engaged in a sector, they do not measure the specific contribution of labor, capital, or any other factor of production. Rather, they reflect the joint effects of many influences, including changes in technology; capital investment; level of output; utilization of capacity, energy, and materials; the organization of production; managerial skill; and the characteristics and effort of the work force.

Econintersect believes a better measure (if you must use monetary tools to tract productivity) would be competitiveness.

Looking at productivity / output long term – output fall below 0% year-over-year change is a good sign that a recession is underway. Another way to look at it – if productivity rate of gain is falling, this could be an indicator a recession is coming.

Related Articles

All employment articles

Share this Econintersect Article:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Wikio
  • email
  • RSS
This entry was posted in aa syndication, Employment and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.