>

Who Is Standing Up for the Middle Class?

Written by

Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman opined:

The point is that a party committed to small government and low taxes on the rich is, more or less necessarily, a party committed to hurting, not helping, the poor. Will this ever change? Well, Republicans weren’t always like this. In fact, all of our major antipoverty programs — Medicaid, food stamps, the earned-income tax credit — used to have bipartisan support.

And maybe someday moderation will return to the G.O.P. For now, however, Republicans are in a deep sense enemies of America’s poor.   And that will remain true no matter how hard the likes of Paul Ryan and Marco Rubio try to convince us otherwise.

The vast majority of the population is not poor – but middle class. How have the political parties done in making their middle class constituents’ lives better. Unfortunately, the only proxy that even comes close to establishing a metric would be median income.

The chart below overlays the incumbent Presidential Party with median income.

There are several obvious “buts” relative to the above chart.

  • for starters, the President is not responsible for fiscal policy – Congress is. The President has some executive regulatory ability but most of the policy rests with Congress;
  • it can takes years for fiscal or regulatory policy to positively or negatively effect the economy.

So taking the same median income chart, I have overlaid the party in control of Congress.

There is little evidence either political party has been good for the middle class. It is not the rich or the poor which drive a consumer economy – but the middle class.  It follows that to ramp up the economy, a consumer driven economy must increase the ability of the middle class to spend. One party seems to believe it is their duty to protect the poor (using transfer payments from the government to fuel spending), while the other seems to protect the rich (as the rich have the ability to fuel the economy through investment).  Both believe in trickle economics – feeding a weak economy using the government to transfer funds that will trickle up or feeding the rich to trickle down. There is no evidence that trickle anything works except for short periods of time. There is only one way to fuel the economy – and that is to fuel the middle class directly by increasing its ability to produce income, and lowering regulatory hurdles so the middle class can directly embark in capitalism.

  • lower tax burdens;
  • remove regulation for small business;

Having spent much of my life living in countries which have limited social safety nets, it always amazes me to see individuals make a living through small business endeavors. This is capitalism. Small business in the USA has been in a down trend for years.  From US Census data:

Number of Small Businesses (employ less than 10 people) per 1000 of Population

The data in the above graph cuts off at 2010, and deals with the number of businesses in existence. From Washington Post, another graph with fresher data points out that the number of business births may be increasing (but no data was provided on business deaths so that a net number of business were known): Professor Krugman maintains that one party is the enemy of the poor. He did not mention who is the advocate for the middle class – maybe because there is no advocate. If the objective was to make the middle class poor – then it is succeeding. From another Washington Post article:

Other Economic News this Week:

The Econintersect economic forecast for January 2013 predicted a slowing economic growth after several months of increasing growth. What this forecast cannot see is the effect of Obamacare – but slowing of growth in this forecast was primarily the result of the business sector.

The ECRI WLI growth index value has been weakly in positive territory for over four months – but in a noticeable improvement trend. The index is indicating the economy six month from today will be slightly better than it is today.

Current ECRI WLI Growth Index

/images/z weekly_indexes.PNG

Initial unemployment claims went from 330,000 (reported last week) to 326,000 this week. Historically, claims exceeding 400,000 per week usually occur when employment gains are less than the workforce growth, resulting in an increasing unemployment rate. The real gauge – the 4 week moving average – improved from 349,000 (reported last week) to 335,000. Because of the noise (week-to-week movements from abnormal events AND the backward revisions to previous weeks releases), the 4-week average remains the reliable gauge.

Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims – 4 Week Average – Seasonally Adjusted – 2011 (red line), 2012 (green line), 2013 (blue line), 2014 (orange line)

/images/z unemployment.PNG

Bankruptcies this Week: none

Weekly Economic Release Scorecard:

Share this Econintersect Article:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Wikio
  • email
  • RSS
This entry was posted in Personal Income and Consumption, Weekly Economic Summary, aa syndication and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.










Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.



2 comments
bluethunderwrx
bluethunderwrx

Krugman is in DEEP DENIAL! The chart data is quite clear which party has been better for the middle class. and Krugman ADMITS that Congress is responsible for fiscal policy. Well, Dr. Douchebag the data by Congress versus median income shows the unmistakable conclusion that median incomes have risen under GOP leadership on fiscal policy and median incomes have consistently declined when democrats are in control of Congress. Too bad your phony altruism does not get results. Maybe its time for you to dislodge your head from your sphincter?

JeffSeussalias
JeffSeussalias

see that is THE problem, there is NO need to "transfer" anything....

 

Congressman Ron Paul:

    "Strictly speaking, it probably is not necessary for the federal government to tax anyone directly; it could simply print the money it needs.

That is from a libertarian, this from a "MMT-er":

"The unlimited ability to create money is an uncontested fact for Monetarily Sovereign nations, although at any given time,economic growth, inflation, deflation, recession, depression and social factors may influence a nation’s decision to create money."

Your "discussion" can best be summed up in a "turn left no turn right or we will fall of the edge of the earth".. when in fact it is round..