The third estimate of first quarter 2012 Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is unchanged at 1.9%
- 3Q2011 GDP was 1.8%
- 4Q2011 GDP was 3.0%
- 1Q2012 GDP advance estimate was 2.2%
- Annual GDP growth for 2011 was 1.7% (calendar year 2011 over calendar year 2010)
- The market expected 3rd estimate 1Q2012 GDP at 1.9%.
The 1Q2012 GDP components have moved around since the advance estimate with consumer spending and government contributions worsening, and being offset by strengthening investment and improving trade balance.
The first-quarter second estimate released today is based based on more complete source data than were available for the “second” estimate. (See caveats below.)
Real GDP is inflation adjusted and annualized – the economy only grew moderately per capita, and per capita GDP is roughly slightly more than half recovered from the trough of the great recession.
The table below compares the composition of the prior releases of GDP with the third estimate 1Q2012 GDP which shows:
- the major headwind to GDP remains the government (-0.80%).
- consumers were moderately active in 1Q2012 – contributing literally all the growth.
What the BEA says about 1Q2012 GDP:
The increase in real GDP in the first quarter reflected positive contributions from personal consumption expenditures (PCE), exports, residential fixed investment, nonresidential fixed investment, and private inventory investment that were partly offset by negative contributions from federal government spending and state and local government spending. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased.
The deceleration in real GDP in the first quarter primarily reflected decelerations in private inventory investment and in nonresidential fixed investment that were partly offset by accelerations in PCE, in exports, and in residential fixed investment and a deceleration in imports.
What the BLS says about the revision from the second to third estimate:
The “third” estimate of the first-quarter increase in real GDP is the same as in the “second” estimate issued last month, reflecting a downward revision to imports and an upward revision to nonresidential fixed investment that were offset by downward revisions to exports, to personal consumption expenditures, and to private inventory investment.
This long after the end of the recession, the USA still remains in a 2%+ economy. Yes it is growth, the the growth sucks.
In the same release, corporate profits data was released showing a contraction in 1Q2012:
First-quarter corporate profits fell 0.3 percent at a quarterly rate following a 0.9 percent rise in the fourth quarter.
First-quarter nonfinancial profits rose 1.4 percent after rising 2.6 percent, and financial profits rose 5.7 percent after rising 7.0 percent. Profits from the rest of the world fell 11.8 percent, after declining 9.2 percent. The first-quarter decline reflected a 2.2 percent drop in receipts from abroad and a 15.9 percent rise in payments to entities abroad.
Here is a look at GDP since Q2 1947 together with the real (inflation-adjusted) S&P Composite. The start date is when the BEA began reporting GDP on a quarterly basis. Prior to 1947, GDP was reported annually. To be more precise, what the lower half of the chart shows is the percent change from the preceding period in Real (inflation-adjusted) Gross Domestic Product. I’ve also included recessions, which are determined by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
Here is a close-up of GDP alone with a line to illustrate the 3.3 average (arithmetic mean) for the quarterly series since the 1947. I’ve also plotted the 10-year moving average, currently at 1.7. The current GDP puts us closer to the moving average.
Here is the same chart with a linear regression that illustrates the gradual decline in GDP over this timeframe. The latest GDP number is below the approximate 2.1 of the regression at the same position on the horizontal axis.
And for a bit of political trivia in this post-election period, here is a look a GDP by party in control of the White House and Congress.
In summary, the Q1 GDP Third Estimate of 1.9% confirms the trend of a weak post-recession recovery — now in its eleventh quarter after the end of the last recession.
Caveats on the Use of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
GDP is market value of all final goods and services produced within the USA where money is used in the transaction – and it is expressed as an annualized number. GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports − imports), or GDP = C + I + G + (X – M). GDP counts monetary expenditures. It is designed to count value added so that goods are not counted over and over as they move through the manufacture – wholesale – retail chain.
The vernacular relating to the different GDP releases:
“Advance” estimates, based on source data that are incomplete or subject to further revision by the source agency, are released near the end of the first month after the end of the quarter; as more detailed and more comprehensive data become available, “second” and “third” estimates are released near the end of the second and third months, respectively. The “latest” estimates reflect the results of both annual and comprehensive revisions.
Consider that GDP includes the costs of suing your neighbor or McDonald’s for hot coffee spilled in your crotch, plastic surgery or cancer treatment, buying a new aircraft carrier for the military, or even the replacement of your house if it burns down – yet little of these activities is real economic growth.
GDP does not include include home costs (other than the new home purchase price even though mortgaged up the kazoo), interest rates, bank charges, or the money spent buying anything used.
It does not measure wealth, disposable income, or employment.
In short, GDP does not measure the change of the economic environment for Joe Sixpack in 1970, and Joe Sixpack’s kid in 2011, yet pundits continuously compare GDP across time periods.
Although there always will be some correlation between all economic pulse points, GDP does not measure the economic elements that directly impact the quality of life of its citizens.