econintersect .com
       
  

FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.



posted on 10 January 2020

December 2019 BLS Jobs Situation - Worst Year For Job Growth Since 2010

Written by Steven Hansen

The headline seasonally adjusted BLS job growth was below expectations. This was the worst year for job growth since 2010.

Analyst Opinion of the BLS Employment Situation

The establishment and household surveys did not correlate well. Jobs growth in 2019 was the worse year for job growth since 2010. The trends are now showing a weakening employment picture.

A summary from the report:

Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 145,000 in December, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.5 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Notable job gains occurred in retail trade and health care, while mining lost jobs.

This is a significantly worse employment report than last month.

The economically intuitive sectors were mixed.

  • The year-over-year rate of growth for employment slowed this month (red line on the graph below). The year-over-year growth rate is below the rate of growth one year ago. This is a year-over-year analysis which has no seasonality issues.

  • Economic intuitive sectors of employment mixed.
  • This month's report internals (comparing household to establishment data sets) did not correlate well with the household survey showing seasonally adjusted employment growing 267,000 vs the headline establishment number expanding 145,000. The point here is that part of the headlines are from the household survey (such as the unemployment rate) and part is from the establishment survey (job growth). From a survey control point of view - the common element is job growth - and if they do not match, your confidence in either survey is diminished. [note that the household survey includes ALL job growth, not just non-farm).
  • The household survey added 209,000 people to the labor force.
  • The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)'s monthly Jobs Report is at the end of this post.

A summary of the employment situation:

  • BLS reported: 145K (non-farm) and 139K (non-farm private). The headline unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.5 %.
  • ADP reported: 202K (non-farm private)
  • In Econintersect's December 2019 economic forecast released in late November, we estimated non-farm private payroll growth at 70,000 (based on economic potential) and 85,000 (fudged based on current overrun / under-run of economic potential).
  • The market expected (from Econoday):
Seasonally Adjusted Data Consensus Range Consensus Actual
Nonfarm Payrolls - M/M change 142,000 to 190,000 160,000 145,000
Unemployment Rate - Level 3.4 % to 3.6 % 3.5 % 3.5 %
Private Payrolls - M/M change 140,000 to 175,000 153,000 139,000
Manufacturing Payrolls - M/M change -12,000 to 38,000 -1,000 -12,000
Participation Rate - level 63.2 % to 63.3 % 63.2 % 63.2 %
Average Hourly Earnings - M/M change 0.2 % to 0.3 % 0.3 % +0.1 %
Average Hourly Earnings - Y/Y change 3.0 % to 3.2 % 3.1 % +2.9 %
Avg Workweek - All Employees

34.4 hrs to 34.5 hrs

34.4 hrs 34.3 hrs

The BLS reports seasonally adjusted data - manipulated with multiple seasonal adjustment factors, and Econintersect believes the unadjusted data gives a clearer picture of the job situation.

The following chart compares the job gains this month with the same month historically - this is the worst month for job growth since 2013.

Year-to-date unadjusted employment growth is 597,000 people below the pace of last year - and the worst year-to-date growth since 2010.

The last month's headline employment gains were revised down. Generally speaking, the INITIAL employment gain estimate is overstated when the economy is slowing and understated when the economy is accelerating.

Concentrating on the labor force growth Vs. employment growth - it should be noted that the trend lines have reversed in April 2019.

Most of the analysis below uses unadjusted data and presents an alternative view of the headline data.

Unemployment

The BLS reported U-3 (headline) unemployment was 3.5 % with the U-6 "all-in" unemployment rate (including those working part-time who want a full-time job worsened from 6.9 % to 6.7 %. These numbers are volatile as they are created from the household survey.

BLS U-3 Headline Unemployment (red line, left axis), U-6 All In Unemployment (blue line, left axis), and Median Duration of Unemployment (green line, right axis)

Econintersect has an interpretation of employment supply slack using the BLS employment-population ratio, demonstrated by the graph below. The employment-population ratio was unchanged at 61.0.

Employment-Population Ratio

The jobs picture - when the employment/population as a whole - has been on an uptrend since mid-2011. This ratio is determined by the household survey.

  • Econintersect uses employment-population ratios to monitor the jobless situation. The headline unemployment number requires the BLS to guess at the size of the workforce, then guess again who is employed or not employed. In employment-population ratios, the population is a given and the guess is who is employed.
  • This ratio has been in a general uptrend since the beginning of 2014. The employment-population ratio tells you the percent of the population with a job. Each 0.1 % increment represents approximately 300,000 jobs. [Note: these are seasonally adjusted numbers - and we are relying on the BLS to get this seasonal adjustment factor correct]. An unchanged ratio would be telling you that job growth was around 150,000 - as this is approximately the new entries to the labor market caused by population growth.
  • The growth in employment since the Great Recession has been in full-time jobs.

Employment Metrics

The growth trend in the establishment survey's non-farm payroll year-over-year growth rate was trending up in 2018. The year-over-year growth rate is declining in 2019.

Unadjusted Non-Farm Payrolls Year-over-Year Growth

Another way to view employment is to watch the total hours worked where trends vary based on periods selected.

Percent Change Year-over-Year Non-Farm Private Weekly Hours Worked

The bullets below use seasonally adjusted data from the establishment survey except where indicated:

  • Average hours worked (table B-2) fell from 34.4 to 34.3. A rising number normally indicates an expanding economy.
  • Government employment grew 6,000 (6K) with the Federal Government down 0K, state governments down 8K and local governments up 14K.
  • The big contributor to employment growth this month was leisure and hospitality (40K), health care/social services (33.9K), and retail trade (41.2K)
  • Manufacturing employment down 12K and construction grew 20K.
  • The unemployment rate (from the household survey) for people between 20 and 24 (Table A-10) worsened from 6.4 % to 6.3 %. This number is produced by a survey and is very volatile.
  • Average hourly earnings (Table B-3) was up $0.03 to $28.32

Private Employment: Average Hourly Earnings

Economic Metrics

Economic markers used to benchmark economic growth (all from the establishment survey).

The truck employment was down 3.5K

Truck Transport Employment - Year-over-Year Change

Temporary help was up 6.4K.

Temporary Help Employment - Year-over-Year Change

Econintersect believes the transport sector is a forward indicator. Others look at temporary help as a forward indicator.

Food for Thought

Who are the victims in this employment situation? It is not people over 55.

Index of Employment Levels - 55 and up (blue line), 45 to 54 (red line), 35 to 44 (green line), 25 to 34 (purple line), 20 to 24 (light blue line), and 16 to 19 (orange line)

Women are doing better than men.

Index of Employment Levels - Men (blue line) vs Women (red line)

Mom and Pop employment remains historically low.

The less education one has the less chance of finding a job.

Index of Employment Levels - University graduate (blue line), Some college or AA degree (orange line), high school graduates (green line), and high school dropouts (red line)

Here is an indexed view of employment levels.

Index of Employment Levels (from the BLS Establishment Survey) - Hispanic (blue line), African American (red line), and White (green line)

However, keep in mind that population growth is different for each group. Here is a look at employment to population ratios which clearly shows NO group has recovered from the Great Recession:

Employment / Population Ratios (from the BLS Household Survey) - Hispanic (blue line), African American (red line), and White (green line)

National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)'s monthly Jobs Report Statement:

Small business owners continued to hire employees, add new positions, and raise compensation in December, ending 2019 on a strong note, according to NFIB's monthly jobs report. Job creation in December stayed the same from the previous month, with owners adding an average addition of 0.29 workers per firm, continuing at the highest level since May.

"2019 was a strong year for small businesses across the country," said NFIB's Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg. "Because of regulatory and tax relief, owners were able to invest in their businesses and employees throughout the year."

Finding qualified workers remained the top issue for owners in December, with 23% reporting it as their number one problem. Fifty-three percent reported hiring or trying to hire, but 94% of those owners reported few or no qualified applicants for the positions they were trying to fill.

Sixty-two percent of construction firms reported few or no qualified applicants and 46% cited the shortage of qualified labor as their top business problem. The manufacturing sector reported comparable figures with 63% and 24% respectively.

Down from last month, 33% (seasonally adjusted) of all owners reported job openings they could not fill in the current period. Sixty-one percent had job openings in construction.

"The inability to assemble work teams is a key contributor to the comparably lackluster performance of the construction industry as evidenced by the December figures," said NFIB's Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg. "Owners are raising compensation in order to attract more qualified applicants to fill open positions."

A historically high percentage of owners have raised and plan to raise worker compensation, with a net 29% reported raising compensation (seasonally adjusted) in the last three months and a net 24% plan to do so in the coming months. Seven percent of owners cited labor costs as their top problem.

Eleven percent of owners reported increasing employment an average of 2.3 workers per firm and 4% reported reducing employment an average of 2.3 workers per firm (seasonally adjusted).

A net seasonally adjusted 19% of owners plan to create new jobs, down 2 points from the previous month. Nineteen percent of owners plan to increase total employment at their firm and 5% plan reductions.

Twenty-seven percent have openings for skilled workers and 13% have openings for unskilled labor. Down from November, 28% of owners reported few or no qualified applicants for their open positions and 22% reported none, unchanged. Reports of few or no qualified applicants were high in manufacturing (63%), construction (62%), and retail (55%).

Click here to view the entire NFIB Jobs Report. For more information about NFIB, please visit NFIB.com. 

Caveat on the use of BLS Jobs Data

The monthly headline data ends up being significantly revised for months after the initial release - and is subject also to annual revisions. The question remains how seriously can you take the data when first released.

Econintersect Contributor Jeff Miller has the following description of BLS methodology:

  1. An initial report of a survey of establishments. Even if the survey sample was perfect (and we all know that it is not) and the response rate was 100% (which it is not) the sampling error alone for a 90% confidence interval is +/- 100K jobs.
  2. The report is revised to reflect additional responses over the next two months.
  3. There is an adjustment to account for job creation — much-maligned and misunderstood by nearly everyone.
  4. The final data are benchmarked against the state employment data every year. This usually shows that the overall process was very good, but it led to major downward adjustments at the time of the recession. More recently, the BLS estimates have been too low.

ADP (blue line) versus BLS (red line) - Monthly Jobs Growth Comparison

However, there is some discussion that neither the ADP nor BLS numbers are correct - as both are derived by a sampling methodology. The answer could be that there is no correct answer in real-time - and that it is best to look at the trends. As has been noted, all eventually end up correlating.

The BLS uses seasonally adjusted data for its headline numbers. The seasonally adjusted employment data is produced by an algorithm. The following graph which shows unadjusted job growth - seasonal adjustments spread employment growth over the entire year. Employment does not really grow in the second half of the year and always falls significantly in January.

Non-Seasonally Adjusted Employment - Private Sector

There is the proverbial question on what is minimal job growth each month required to allow for new entrants to the market. Depending on mindset, this answer varies. According to Investopdia, the number is between 100,000 and 150,000. The Wall Street Journal is citing 125K. Mark Zandi said 150K. Econintersect is going with Mark Zandi's number:

  • In Econintersect's June 2014 economic forecast released in late May, we estimated non-farm payroll growth at 160,000 (unadjusted based on economic potential) and 229,000 (fudged based on current overrun of economic potential).
  • If Econintersect uses employment-population ratios, the correct number would be the number where this ratio improved. Using the graph below, the ratio began to improve starting a little after mid-year. This corresponds to the period where the 12-month rolling average of job gains hit 150,000.

Employment to Population Ratio

Note: The ratio could be fine-tuned by adjusting to the ratio of employment to working-age population rather than the total population. However, this would not change the big picture that an increase of somewhere around 150,000 (+/-) is needed for the growing population numbers. We have an estimated 140k - 160k. The number might possibly be within the range 125k - 175k. Econintersect cannot find a reason to support the estimates below 125k.

The question of how changing demographics impact the employment numbers is at the margins of analysis. Econintersect will publish more on this fine-tuning going forward, both in-house research and the work of others



>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<



Permanent link to most recent post on this topic

Click here for Historical Releases Listing










Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted. You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.




Facebook Comment



Econintersect Economic Releases




advertisement - our newsletter sponsor

Biggest transfer of Wealth in US history has begun

A Maryland multimillionaire says the biggest legal transfer of wealth in American history has just gotten underway - here is the No. 1 step you must take

More details here...

[Click here to subscribe to our newsletter]








search_box
Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF


The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.







Keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government























 navigate econintersect .com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2020 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved