econintersect.com
       
  

FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.



posted on 13 February 2016

First Quarter 2016 Survey of Professional Forecasters Again Lower Growth over the Next Three Years

from the Philadelphia Fed

The economy looks weaker now than it did three months ago, according to 40 forecasters surveyed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. The forecasters predict real GDP will grow at an annual rate of 2.0 percent this quarter and 2.5 percent next quarter.

On an annual-average over annual-average basis, real GDP will grow 2.1 percent in 2016, down 0.5 percentage point from the previous estimate. The forecasters predict real GDP will grow 2.4 percent in 2017 and 2.7 percent in 2018, both down 0.1 percentage point from the estimates of three months ago. For 2019, real GDP is estimated to grow at 2.3 percent.

A slightly positive outlook for the labor market accompanies the outlook for weaker output growth. The forecasters predict that the unemployment rate will average 4.8 percent in 2016, before falling to 4.6 percent in 2017, 4.6 percent in 2018, and 4.7 percent in 2019. The projections for 2017 and 2018 are slightly below those of the last survey.

The panelists also predict a small improvement on the employment front. They have revised upward their estimates for job gains in 2016. The forecasters see nonfarm payroll employment growing at a rate of 195,000 jobs per month this quarter, 183,200 jobs per month next quarter, 195,900 jobs per month in the third quarter of 2016, and 152,600 jobs per month in the fourth quarter of 2016. The forecasters' projections for the annual-average level of nonfarm payroll employment suggest job gains at a monthly rate of 204,300 in 2016 and 165,000 in 2017, as the table below shows. (These annual-average estimates are computed as the year-to-year change in the annual-average level of nonfarm payroll employment, converted to a monthly rate.)

Median Forecasts for Selected Variables in the Current and Previous Surveys
Real GDP (%) Unemployment Rate (%) Payrolls (000s/month)
Previous New Previous New Previous New
Quarterly data:
2016:Q1

2.5

2.0

4.9

4.9

188.2

195.0

2016:Q2

2.6

2.5

4.8

4.8

193.5

183.2

2016:Q3

2.9

2.3

4.8

4.7

192.0

195.9

2016:Q4

2.4

2.5

4.7

4.6

181.2

152.6

2017:Q1

N.A.

2.4

N.A.

4.6

N.A.

177.1

Annual data (projections are based on annual-average levels):
2016

2.6

2.1

4.8

4.8

197.0

204.3

2017

2.5

2.4

4.7

4.6

N.A.

165.0

2018

2.8

2.7

4.7

4.6

N.A.

N.A.

2019

N.A.

2.3

N.A.

4.7

N.A.

N.A.

The charts below provide some insight into the degree of uncertainty the forecasters have about their projections for the rate of growth in the annual-average level of real GDP. Each chart (except the one for 2019) presents the forecasters' previous and current estimates of the probability that growth will fall into each of 11 ranges. The charts show the forecasters have revised upward their estimates of the probability that real GDP growth will fall below 2.0 percent in 2016, 2017, and 2018.

The forecasters' density projections for unemployment, shown below, shed light on uncertainty about the labor market over the next four years. Each chart presents the forecasters' current estimates of the probability that unemployment will fall into each of 10 ranges. The charts show the panelists are raising their density estimates over the next three years at the lower levels of unemployment outcomes.

Forecasters Predict Lower Headline Inflation over the Next Two Years

The forecasters expect lower headline CPI inflation in 2016 and 2017 than they predicted three months ago. Measured on a fourth-quarter over fourth-quarter basis, headline CPI inflation is expected to average 1.5 percent in 2016 and 2.2 percent in 2017, down from 2.0 percent and 2.3 percent, respectively, in the last survey. The forecasters have also revised downward their projections for headline PCE inflation in 2016 to 1.3 percent, down from 1.8 percent in the survey of three months ago.

Over the next 10 years, 2016 to 2025, the forecasters expect headline CPI inflation to average 2.12 percent at an annual rate. The corresponding estimate for 10-year annual-average PCE inflation is 1.97 percent.

Median Short-Run and Long-Run Projections for Inflation (Annualized Percentage Points)
Headline CPI Core CPI Headline PCE Core PCE
Previous Current Previous Current Previous Current Previous Current
Quarterly
2016:Q1

1.8

0.4

1.9

1.8

1.6

0.4

1.5

1.4

2016:Q2

2.1

1.6

2.0

2.0

1.8

1.6

1.6

1.5

2016:Q3

2.1

2.1

2.0

2.0

1.8

1.8

1.7

1.7

2016:Q4

2.2

2.1

2.0

2.0

1.9

1.8

1.7

1.7

2017:Q1

N.A.

2.1

N.A.

2.0

N.A.

1.8

N.A.

1.7

Q4/Q4 Annual Averages
2016

2.0

1.5

2.0

2.0

1.8

1.3

1.6

1.6

2017

2.3

2.2

2.1

2.1

1.9

1.9

1.8

1.8

2018

N.A.

2.3

N.A.

2.1

N.A.

2.0

N.A.

1.9

Long-Term Annual Averages
2015-2019

1.90

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

1.65

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

2016-2020

N.A.

2.08

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

1.88

N.A.

N.A.

2015-2024

2.15

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

1.90

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

2016-2025

N.A.

2.12

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

1.97

N.A.

N.A.

The charts below show the median projections (the red line) and the associated interquartile ranges (the gray areas around the red line) for the projections for 10-year annual-average CPI and PCE inflation. The top panel shows a slightly lower level of the long-term projection for CPI inflation, at 2.12 percent. The bottom panel shows the slightly higher 10-year forecast for PCE inflation, at 1.97 percent.

The figures below show the probabilities that the forecasters are assigning to the possibility that fourth-quarter over fourth-quarter core PCE inflation in 2016 and 2017 will fall into each of 10 ranges. For 2016, the forecasters have increased the probability that core PCE inflation will be below 1.5 percent, compared with their estimates in the survey of three months ago.

Higher Risk of a Negative Quarter

For the current quarter, the forecasters predict a 14.4 percent chance of negative growth in real GDP. As the table below shows, the forecasters have also increased their risk estimates for a downturn in the following quarters, compared with their previous estimates.

Risk of a Negative Quarter (%)
Survey Means
Quarterly data: Previous New
2016:Q1

13.0

14.4

2016:Q2

12.6

14.7

2016:Q3

13.7

15.8

2016:Q4

14.7

17.0

2017:Q1

N.A.

18.8

Forecasters State Their Views on Home Price Growth over the Next Two Years

In this survey, a special question asked panelists to provide their forecasts for fourth-quarter over fourth-quarter growth in house prices, as measured by a number of alternative indices. The panelists were allowed to choose their measure from a list of indices or to write in their own index. For each index of their choosing, the panelists provided forecasts for growth in 2016 and 2017.

Eighteen panelists answered the special question. Some panelists provided projections for more than one index. The table below provides a summary of the forecasters' responses. The number of responses (N) is low for each index. The median estimates for the seven house-price indices listed in the table below range from 2.9 percent to 5.0 percent in 2016 and from 2.5 percent to 4.4 percent in 2017.

Projections for Growth in Various Indices of House Prices
Q4/Q4, Percentage Points
2016
(Q4/Q4 Percent Change)
2017
(Q4/Q4 Percent Change)
Index N Mean Median N Mean Median
S&P/Case-Shiller: U.S. National

2

4.6

4.6

2

4.0

4.0

S&P/Case-Shiller: Composite 10

1

4.5

4.5

1

4.4

4.4

S&P/Case-Shiller: Composite 20

4

2.7

2.9

4

2.4

2.5

FHFA: U.S. Total

3

4.9

5.0

3

3.9

4.0

FHFA: Purchase Only

6

4.3

4.7

6

3.5

3.8

CoreLogic: National HPI, incl. Distressed Sales (Single Family Combined)

3

4.9

4.9

2

3.7

3.7

NAR Median: Total Existing

2

3.4

3.4

2

3.2

3.2

Forecasters Predict Lower Long-Run Growth in Output and Productivity and in Returns to Financial Assets

In our first-quarter surveys, the forecasters provide their long-run projections for an expanded set of variables, including growth in output and productivity, as well as returns on financial assets.

As the table below shows, the forecasters have reduced their estimates for the annual-average rate of growth in real GDP over the next 10 years. Currently, the forecasters expect real GDP to grow at an annual-average rate of 2.28 percent over the next 10 years, down from their projection of 2.50 percent in the first-quarter survey of 2015. Productivity growth is now expected to average 1.40 percent, down from 1.70 percent.

Downward revisions to the return on the financial assets accompany the current outlook. The forecasters see the S&P 500 returning an annual-average 5.37 percent per year over the next 10 years, down slightly from 5.45 percent in last year's first-quarter survey. The forecasters expect the rate on 10-year Treasuries to average 3.39 percent over the next 10 years, down from 3.98 percent in last year's first-quarter survey. Three-month Treasury bills will return an annual-average 2.50 percent per year over the next 10 years, down from 2.67 percent.

Median Long-Term (10-Year) Forecasts (%)
First Quarter 2015 Current Survey
Real GDP Growth

2.50

2.28

Productivity Growth

1.70

1.40

Stock Returns (S&P 500)

5.45

5.37

Rate on 10-Year Treasury Bonds

3.98

3.39

Bill Returns (3-Month)

2.67

2.50

The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia thanks the following forecasters for their participation in recent surveys:

Lewis Alexander, Nomura Securities; Scott Anderson, Bank of the West (BNP Paribas Group); Robert J. Barbera, Johns Hopkins University Center for Financial Economics;Peter Bernstein, RCF Economic and Financial Consulting, Inc.; Christine Chmura,Ph.D., and Xiaobing Shuai, Ph.D., Chmura Economics & Analytics; Gary Ciminero, CFA, GLC Financial Economics; Nathaniel Curtis, Navigant Consulting; Gregory Daco, Oxford Economics USA, Inc.; Rajeev Dhawan, Georgia State University; Michael R. Englund, Action Economics, LLC; Michael Gapen, Barclays Capital; James Glassman, JPMorgan Chase & Co.; Matthew Hall, Daniil Manaenkov, and Ben Meiselman, RSQE, University of Michigan; Jan Hatzius, Goldman Sachs; Keith Hembre, Nuveen Asset Management;Peter Hooper, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.; IHS Global Insight; Fred Joutz, Benchmark Forecasts and Research Program on Forecasting, George Washington University; Sam Kahan, Kahan Consulting Ltd. (ACT Research LLC); N. Karp, BBVA Research USA; Walter Kemmsies, Moffatt & Nichol; Jack Kleinhenz, Kleinhenz & Associates, Inc.; Thomas Lam, RHB Securities Singapore Pte. Ltd.; L. Douglas Lee, Economics from Washington; John Lonski, Moody's Capital Markets Group;Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; R. Anthony Metz, Pareto Optimal Economics; Michael Moran, Daiwa Capital Markets America; Joel L. Naroff, Naroff Economic Advisors; Mark Nielson, Ph.D., MacroEcon Global Advisors; Luca Noto, Anima Sgr; Brendon Ogmundson, BC Real Estate Association; Tom Porcelli, RBC Capital Markets; Arun Rahaand Maira Trimble, Eaton Corporation; Martin A. Regalia, U.S. Chamber of Commerce;Philip Rothman, East Carolina University; Chris Rupkey, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ;John Silvia, Wells Fargo; Allen Sinai, Decision Economics, Inc.; Sean M. Snaith, Ph.D., University of Central Florida; Constantine G. Soras, Ph.D., CGS Economic Consulting;Stephen Stanley, Amherst Pierpont Securities; Charles Steindel, Ramapo College of New Jersey; Susan M. Sterne, Economic Analysis Associates, Inc.; James Sweeney, Credit Suisse; Thomas Kevin Swift, American Chemistry Council; Richard Yamarone, Bloomberg, LP; Mark Zandi, Moody's Analytics; Ellen Zentner, Morgan Stanley.

This is a partial list of participants. We also thank those who wish to remain anonymous.

Source

https://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/real-time-center/survey-of-professional-forecasters/2016/survq116


>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<




Permanent link to most recent post on this topic

Click here for Historical Releases Listing










Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, using Livefyre just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.



You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.







Econintersect Economic Releases


search_box

Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF


The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.


Take a look at what is going on inside of Econintersect.com
Main Home
Analysis Blog
The Problem With Obamacare Is That It Did Little To Reduce Overall Healthcare Spending
Joan Robinson’s Critique of Marginal Utility Theory
News Blog
The Last Bucket Catch
Joe Sixpack's Situation in 3Q2016: The Average Joe Is Better Off
Why Are Some People More Delinquent On Loans Than Others? - Part 1
Gravity Returns To San Francisco Housing Market
Violent Bond Selloff: An Eye-Opening Perspective
Infographic Of The Day: Identity Theft: You Should Be Worried
Early Headlines: Russia Hacked GOP, Trump To Drain Energy 'Swamp'?, New Sec'y Of State Candidate, India IP Shrinks, India Has World's New Largest Solar Plant , China GDP Hides Volatility And More
Most Coup Attempts In Recent Years Have Failed
The Global Cost Of Diabetes
The Universities Churning Out The Most Billionaires
Five Amazing Ways Plants Have Created New Technologies
Where U.S. Weekly Wages Go The Furthest
What We Read Today 09 December 2016
Investing Blog
The New Art Of Utility Investing
Investing,com Weekly Wrap-up 09 December 2016
Opinion Blog
Trickle-down Economics, Trump Edition
Looking At Everything: Trump's $1 Trillion Infrastructure Plan
Precious Metals Blog
Silver Prices Rebounded Today: Where They Are Headed
Live Markets
09Dec2016 Market Close: Wall Street Closes On A New High, Trump Sugar High, Crude Prices Testing Resistance, US Dollar Melts Higher
Amazon Books & More






.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government



Crowdfunding ....






























 navigate econintersect.com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2016 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved