FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.

posted on 06 November 2016

Why The House Of Representatives Will Likely Remain Republican

from The Conversation

-- this post authored by Royce Carroll, University of Essex

What happens after the US election on November 8 will be shaped not just by who wins, but by the president's relationship with the two houses of Congress. As usual, one third of the Senate and all of the House of Representatives are up for election on the same day as the president. Both are currently under Republican control - but some Democrats are starting to wonder if they might just take both of them back.

Contests for control of the Senate have typically paralleled presidential races. Historically, the makeup of the House of Representatives has also generally matched the outcome, with the party that wins the presidency doing better at the congressional level, too.

If anything, this relationship has only become stronger in recent election cycles. A Trump victory is highly likely to bring with it Republican majorities in both the Senate and the House, and in a typical year, we would expect a victorious Hillary Clinton to also carry a fair number of House Democrats into office with her. But even if she wins, can the Democrats really retake the House?

One of the things that makes this year's election cycle so unusual is the possibility that some voters could choose Republican candidates for House seats while voting against Donald Trump, who is much more distant from the mainstream of his party than most presidential candidates. Trump won the presidential nomination against considerable establishment opposition, and he's still not on friendly terms with the party elite. Some Republican house candidates haven't endorsed him, and some are even explicitly distancing themselves from him.

This means that many more voters than usual might think separately about their congressional and presidential choices - and if that link is broken, it means presidential votes pulled from Trump to Clinton won't necessarily bring congressional votes with them.

Then there's the risk that voters will go to the polls expecting Hillary Clinton to win. Notwithstanding recent developments in the saga of her State Department-era emails, she remains favoured by electoral projections. If this perception remains, that could actually undermine house Democrats' chances. Recent research has shown that, historically, house Democrats have done worse at the polls in years when their presidential candidate was considered highly likely to win. This may indicate that voters like to "balance" their choices in the hope that the presidency and the two chambers of Congress aren't controlled by one party.

Both of these reasons are quite specific to this election year. But there's another obstacle in the Democrats' way - one that they can't do much about.

Locked out

Even if Hillary Clinton wins a victory that helps her Congressional colleagues win more votes, the potential for Democrats to obtain a majority of seats in the House is nevertheless quite unlikely due to the current structure of legislative redistricting.

The legislative redistricting process is heavily influenced by partisan "gerrymandering." Legislative redistricting is the process of adjusting constituency boundaries, which should contain an equal number of residents, to reflect population changes. Gerrymandering - named for a salamander-shaped district designed by one of redistricting's earliest innovators - refers to the practice of using this process to create districts, often with torturous shapes, to provide an advantage to certain politicians.

In many states, redistricting is controlled by the state legislature, meaning that whichever party controls the legislature can optimise the boundaries of their state's House districts along demographic lines. When this happens, the result is to dilute the concentration of voters likely to vote for the opposing party.

This is done by drawing boundaries that divide the supporters of a party so that this party will win majorities in the fewest possible districts. When partisan gerrymandering is successful, it's remarkably effective: it can mean a party that wins 50% or more of the statewide congressional vote only wins 40% or fewer of the state's congressional seats.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (Republican) and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Democrat). EPA/Jim Lo Scalzo

Gerrymandering has long been used by both parties, but the current situation clearly favours the Republicans. The last round of redistricting was held just after Republicans took over a remarkable number of state legislatures in 2010. It also came after a 2004 Supreme Court ruling which decided that partisan gerrymandering need not be subject to judicial oversight - meaning that new district boundaries can no longer be legally challenged on grounds of partisan bias.

The results are plain to see. According to recent research, the partisan bias that's emerged since 2010 is even more marked than it was in previous decades. The upshot is that Democrats now need at least 54-55% of the national congressional vote to win control of the House. Sure enough, President Obama's comfortable re-election in 2012 didn't translate into significant Democratic gains in the House, even though Democrats won a larger overall share of the nationwide congressional vote.

Econintersect note: See this 2012 article The Gerrymander Triumph.

Take all these obstacles together and Clinton almost certainly needs to win by an extraordinary margin to secure an allied House of Representatives.

While it is by no means clear what Trump's relationship with a Republican-controlled Congress would look like, the recent history of divided government certainly suggests there is cause for concern.

US politics in recent years have been particularly polarised and acrimonious. The resulting gridlock has destabilised federal policy-making at a time when the nation faces severe challenges. The raw anger on display in the 2016 presidential election is not going away - and another two to four years of deadlocked government will hardly help.

The ConversationRoyce Carroll, Reader in Comparative Politics, University of Essex

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical Opinion Post Listing

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, using Livefyre just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.

You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.

Econintersect Opinion


Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF

The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.

Take a look at what is going on inside of
Main Home
Analysis Blog
Is Free Trade Harming the Economy?
Bank of England Endorses Post-Keynesian Endogenous Money Theory
News Blog
Investor Bulletin: Savings And Investing Basics For Military Personnel
Does Growing Mismeasurement Explain Disappointing Growth?
Why Does Economic Growth Keep Slowing Down?
Houses As ATMs No Longer - Part Three Of Five
Infographic Of The Day: What It's Like To Live On Minimum Wage
Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Up, Dollar, Oil Up, Gold Down, Investors Bet Higher Oil, Kraft-Unilever Deal Off, French Election Turmoil, Trump Worries Germans More Than Putin, Japan Imports Surge And More
Most Read Articles Last Week Ending 18 February
Living Through The Greek Crisis: An Anthropologist Reports From Thessaly
ITunes Still Popular Among U.S. Music Lovers
President Trump, You Need A Lesson In Autism - Here It Is
Defense Budgets Are Surging In The Baltic States
What We Read Today 19 February 2017
Half Of Small Businesses Say Regulations Are A Problem
Investing Blog
Bulls Keep Running, But . . .
The Week Ahead: Trump And The Business Cycle
Opinion Blog
Charity Is Not How We Solve Poverty
At A Turning Point In US History, Shepard Smith Denounces Trump
Precious Metals Blog
The Best Gold Stock To Buy Right Now
Live Markets
20Feb2017 Pre-Market Commentary: US Markets Closed Today In Observance Of The Presidents Day Holiday, US Dollar Slips, European Stocks Rise
Amazon Books & More

.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government



Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved