econintersect.com
       
  

FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.



posted on 18 July 2016

Why National Polls Mean Little In U.S. Presidential Elections

Written by

The standard story is that Barck Obama defeated Mitt Romney handily in the 2012 presidential election. But, upon closer examination the election was a squeak-through for Obama.

romney.obama.380x228

Yes, Obama did have a popular vote margin of 4.982 million and won the electoral vote by 332-206. But if just 278,000 who voted for Obama had instead cast their ballots for Romney, Romney would have been elected by the electoral college 273-265. Obama would have had a popular vote plurality of more than 4.4 million votes but would not have returned for a second term.

The votes switched to produce the Romney victory would have been in just three states: Florida (38,000 out of 8.474 million or 0.45%), Ohio (84,000 out of 5.581 million or 1.5%) and Pennsylvania (156,000 out of 5.754 million or 2.7%). All of these are within the margin of error for most polling services, Florida and Ohio are both less than the margin of error for any poll. See data for all polling services here. This is the first reason why national polls are simply insufficiently reliable in a close election, even one where the final margin of victory approached 5 million.

Many polls indicated the popular vote nationally in 2012 would be a virtual tie. The average for all polls indicated an advantage for Obama of 0.7%, which would have been about 900,000 of the 129 million votes cast. The final margin was 4.982 million, a difference of almost 4.1 million or 3.2%. This is outside the measurement error quoted for 15 of the 17 polls completed in the days starting with November 1 and only three of the 15 had Obama receiving more than 49% of the vote, while two actually had Romney ahead. The average for all the polls was 48.8% for Obama and 48.1% for Romney. The election tally was Obama 51.1%, Romney 47.2% and others 1.7%.

The discussion above is the second reason that national polls have little meaning in close presidential elections. They simply have too wide a margin of error.

If someone has a polling margin of 5% that may start to be an indication of a lead that is likely to hold up for a victory in the election. But that is only a margin of 6.5 million in an election with 130 million votes cast. In a future post I will show with hypotheticals that even with a vote plurality of the order of 6 million it is quite conceivable that the popular vote winner could lose in the electoral college.

2012.pres.election.part12012.pres.election.part2

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical Opinion Post Listing










Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted. You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.




Econintersect Opinion


search_box

Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF


The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.


Take a look at what is going on inside of Econintersect.com
Main Home
Analysis Blog
The Job Guarantee, Wage-Price Inflation And Alternative Solutions: Part 1
The Job Guarantee, Wage-Price Inflation And Alternative Solutions: Part 2
News Blog
Why NASA Won't Send Humans To Venus
Rail Week Ending 18 March 2017: Short Term Rate of Growth Slowing
How Taxes And Transfers Affect The Work Incentives Of People With Low And Moderate Income
How Tourism Affects China's Current Account Surplus
Infographic Of The Day: The Habits Of Highly Successful Entrepreneurs
To Where The Maple Syrup Flows
The U.S. Has The Most Expensive Healthcare System In The World
Five Maps That Will Change How You See The World
What We Read Today 16 March 2017 - Special Public Edition
Hate Groups In The U.S. Are Flourishing
What We Read Today 23 March 2017
March 2017 Kansas City Fed Manufacturing At Highest Level Since March 2011
February 2017 Headline New Home Sales Improve and Above Expectations
Investing Blog
Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Mixed, Dollar, Oil Up, Gold Down, Health Care Vote Today, Calif. Solar, Russia And Poison, Mumbai Bridge, Sanctions Cause Suffering In N. Korea, And More
Tesla Is Playing The Long Game
Opinion Blog
Time To Stop Rewarding Economists For Bad Behaviour
The American Dream: An Endangered Ethos
Precious Metals Blog
These Gold Stocks Will Produce Much Bigger Gains Than Gold Itself
Live Markets
24Mar2017 Pre-Market Commentary: Looks Like Markets Will Flatline
Amazon Books & More






.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government































 navigate econintersect.com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved