econintersect.com
       
  

FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.



posted on 01 January 2016

Why Is The General Theory A GeneralTheory?

by Dirk Ehnts, Econoblog101

The answer to the above question is found in the book's chapters one and two (source):

I have called this book the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, placing the emphasis on the prefix general.

The object of such a title is to contrast the character of my arguments and conclusions with those of the classical [1] theory of the subject, upon which I was brought up and which dominates the economic thought, both practical and theoretical, of the governing and academic classes of this generation, as it has for a hundred years past. I shall argue that the postulates of the classical theory are applicable to a special case only and not to the general case, the situation which it assumes being a limiting point of the possible positions of equilibrium. Moreover, the characteristics of the special case assumed by the classical theory happen not to be those of the economic society in which we actually live, with the result that its teaching is misleading and disastrous if we attempt to apply it to the facts of experience.

[...]

The classical theory of employment¾supposedly simple and obvious¾has been based, I think, on two fundamental postulates, though practically without discussion, namely:

I. The wage is equal to the marginal product of labour

That is to say, the wage of an employed person is equal to the value which would be lost if employment were to be reduced by one unit (after deducting any other costs which this reduction of output would avoid); subject, however, to the qualification that the equality may be disturbed, in accordance with certain principles, if competition and markets are imperfect.

II. The utility of the wage when a given volume of labour is employed is equal to the marginal disutility of that amount of employment.

That is to say, the real wage of an employed person is that which is just sufficient (in the estimation of the employed persons themselves) to induce the volume of labour actually employed to be forthcoming; subject to the qualification that the equality for each individual unit of labour may be disturbed by combination between employable units analogous to the imperfections [p.6] of competition which qualify the first postulate. Disutility must be here understood to cover every kind of reason which might lead a man, or a body of men, to withhold their labour rather than accept a wage which had to them a utility below a certain minimum.

[..]

Let us assume, for the moment, that labour is not prepared to work for a lower money-wage and that a reduction in the existing level of money-wages would lead, through strikes or otherwise, to a withdrawal from the labour market of labour which is now employed. Does it follow from this that the existing level of real wages accurately measures the marginal disutility of labour? Not necessarily. For, although a reduction in the existing money-wage would lead to a withdrawal of labour, it does not follow that a fall in the value of the existing money-wage in terms of wage-goods would do so, if it were due to a rise in the price of the latter. In other words, it may be the case that within a certain range the demand of labour is for a minimum money-wage and not for a minimum real wage. The classical school have (sic!) tacitly assumed that this would involve no significant change in their theory. But this is not so. For if the supply of labour is not a function of real wages as its sole variable, their argument breaks down entirely and leaves the question of what the actual employment will be quite indeterminate.[1] They do not seem to have realised that, unless the supply of labour is a function of real wages alone, [p.9] their supply curve for labour will shift bodily with every movement of prices. Thus their method is tied up with their very special assumptions, and cannot be adapted to deal with the more general case.

With hindsight, it seems to me that Keynes was arguing against the classics, but he did not go further. With indebted workers, there must be wage levels which are consistent with repayment of loans and others which are not. Also, wage levels depend on demand for labor, and this Keynes makes clear later in the book.

So, the way I read it the General Theory includes the special case of workers being paid their marginal product of labour. Nevertheless, even in this special case depression can and will arise if aggregate demand for some reason falls sharply.

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical Opinion Post Listing










Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, using Livefyre just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.



You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.





Econintersect Opinion


search_box

Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF


The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.


Take a look at what is going on inside of Econintersect.com
Main Home
Analysis Blog
A New Era of Central Banking?
China, Russia, and the United States: Are They Superpowers?
News Blog
When Evidence Says No, But Doctors Say Yes
Pacific Rim States Affected By Trump's War On Free Trade
Real Paleo Diet: Early Hominids Ate Just About Everything
Amazon's Global Workforce Is Growing Rapidly
What We Read Today 23 February 2017
February 2017 Kansas City Fed Manufacturing At Highest Level Since June 2011
Lost In The Sixties-The Winds Of Change
January 2017 CFNAI Super Index Moving Average Statistically Unchanged
18 February 2017 Initial Unemployment Claims Rolling Average Insignificantly Improves
Jihadism: An Eerily Familiar Threat
Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Forecast For February 2017
Infographic Of The Day: Guide To Tipping
Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Mostly Down, Oil Up, Dollar And Gold Steady, Extreme Arctic Warmth, Town Halls, More Water In Calif, UK Bogus Green Power, Mosul Airport Attacked And More
Investing Blog
How Snapchat's Planned IPO Would Stack Up
Investing.com Technical Summary 23 February 2016
Opinion Blog
Kenneth Arrow's Ignored Impossibility Theorem
The Blame Game
Precious Metals Blog
Deflation And Gold: A Contrarian View
Live Markets
23Feb2017 Market Close: Wall Street Closes Mixed Near The Unchanged Line, Nasdaq Closed Down Fractionally, The DOW Closes Up 35 Points, Crude And The US Dollar Remain Mostly Unchanged
Amazon Books & More






.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government





























 navigate econintersect.com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved