posted on 11 February 2017
by Gene D. Balas
U.S. small cap stocks, a barometer of investors’ risk appetite, surged after the election of President Donald Trump, while larger cap stocks also rallied, just not by as much. Part of the reason why small cap stocks rallied is due to reinforced faith in the U.S. economy that may benefit these companies. Meanwhile, part of the reason why large cap stocks lagged is due to their perceived sensitivity to the U.S. dollar on their foreign earnings.
Large companies may be more sensitive to currencies than smaller companies
Speaking of the dollar first, according to Standard & Poor’s, 44.3% of the earnings of companies in the large-cap S&P 500 come from abroad. This income is derived from local currency, which is then translated into dollars, at least for reporting purposes (it isn’t necessarily repatriated into the U.S.). Since mid-2014, the ICE Dollar index, a measure of the currency against a basket of six major rivals, has already appreciated about 25% to hit 14-year highs, according to FactSet. This means each unit of currency abroad buys fewer dollars, reducing income. Smaller companies derive more of their revenues here, the thinking goes. So, you might believe that means the market might reward those companies more richly than bigger companies.
And you’re right: small cap stocks have done better than bigger companies since the surprise election victory of Donald Trump as shown in the nearby graph. And investors believe that bigger companies will continue to underperform small cap stocks looking ahead, as seen in the next chart.
One factor behind the tilt away from large companies comes from their own commentary, such as when reporting earnings or discussing issues with analysts. For the September-to-December quarter, executives at 72% of companies have discussed foreign exchange or currencies, according to a Credit Suisse analysis of the S&P 500 firms that had reported through Jan. 18.
Of course, there are other concerns as well. Through January 18, 68% of S&P 500 companies providing earnings guidance have addressed issues surrounding what the new administration and its policies, known and unknown, might mean for their business, according to John Butters, senior earnings analyst at FactSet.
Investor complacency is itself an indication of potential risks
So far, our discussion has focused on an either/or scenario: Either small caps outperform large caps or it’s the other way around. But this implies a positive performance scenario. It’s extremely difficult to predict market returns, especially over the short term, so we won’t even try. However, there are signs that one might be cautious, not least because other investors aren’t.
It’s true: market complacency about risks often leads to risks surfacing. We’ve discussed small cap stock performance, with strong returns a signal investors are more comfortable taking on risk. There’s another signal, too, and that is the market’s “fear gauge," a measure of implied volatility embedded in the pricing of certain financial instruments, known as the VIX. When it is high, investors are fearful; when it is low, investors may be complacent, too complacent, possibly. Recently, the VIX plumbed lows not seen in years.
Curiously, however, VIX touched a low point just as economic uncertainty spiked, as seen in the nearby graph. This is a puzzling development: we normally expect to see the two move in tandem. When the gap between the two was this large previously (in late 2012), the Russell 2000 fell by 11% from September 14, 2012 to November 15, 2012, according to Bloomberg. We can’t say that the past will repeat the future, but we can say this is a reason to be cautious.
The market is pricey - and may be more dependent than usual on earnings results
The P/E ratio for the S&P 500 is currently 24.74, using earnings over the past twelve months, according to Dow Jones data. A year ago, it was 20.93. The long term history for this measure is 16.7 since the 1870s. For shares to justify these multiples, investors may require seeing evidence of higher profits before paying up to own stocks. Having highlighted the risks above, earnings might eventually be a catalyst for a change in the market’s direction.
Certainly, investors are pricing in quite a bit of enthusiasm. Whether economic data - and, importantly, corporate earnings - will justify these prices remains to be seen. In the meantime, there may be some reasons to be prudent about which risks to undertake and which to delay.
>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<
This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved