econintersect .com

FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.

posted on 29 October 2016

Outrageous Profit Potential From Three Of The World's Worst Companies

by Keith Fitz-Gerald, Money Morning

Money Morning Article of the Week

Many investors focus exclusively on buying the best stocks, which is great… until they realize that they're missing out on half the profit potential in front of them.

That's not good enough for me; I don't ever want to see you leave money on the table that could otherwise be in your pocket.

worst companies

So I want to show you how to find the outrageous profit potential…

…associated with three of the world's worst companies.

Triple-Digit Profits from Losers

Most investors have a one-track mind, meaning they're limited to thinking about how to make money when stocks are headed higher. And they freak out if there's even the slightest squiggle on a chart in the other direction.

To be sure, there are great investments for these people. Take this small tech stock I've been tracking - it's nearly doubled its customer base in the past year, and on Nov. 1, it's expected to announce a 325% earnings growth, which could send its shares skyrocketing.

You can find all the details on this opportunity here.

But other investors - a precious few, really - rack up extraordinary returns when the going gets tough.

George Soros, for example, made a cool $1 billion in a single trade that famously almost broke the Bank of England in 1992.

John Paulson became a legend in 2007 when he reportedly made nearly $4 billion by using credit swaps to bet against the subprime mortgage market.

Jim Chanos runs the $3 billion Kynikos Associates and is best known for having correctly shorted Enron just prior to its collapse.

Obviously, going against the grain isn't for everybody - it takes a lot of guts and more than a little conviction to do it profitably. Not to mention a healthy dose of discipline.

Done right, though, it can really boost your profits. And, best of all, you'll never fear a market correction ever again!

How to Short a Stock

You have to have brokerage approval and an appropriate amount of collateral on hand to do it. That's because, technically speaking, you're "borrowing shares" to sell them before you actually own them.

When you buy a stock, you are laying out cash at a specific price and hoping to sell it later for a higher price. You believe the price of that stock is going to rise.

When you short a stock, you are doing the exact opposite. You believe the price is going to decline, so you sell it first and then buy it back at a later date and presumably at a cheaper price. Cash proceeds from selling are transferred into your account immediately.

When you want to exit a short trade, you have to "cover" the trade, meaning you have to buy those same shares at the prevailing market price and replace the ones you've borrowed from your broker.

The difference between what you received when you sold and what you paid when you exited is your profit. Of course, if the stock actually rises in price, the difference is your loss because it will cost you more to buy the same shares you've already sold, so risk management is critical.

Here's a simple example that may help.

Let's say George thinks XYZ is doomed, so he checks with his broker to see if those shares are available for shorting - meaning the broker has them in "inventory."

The answer is yes, so George sells 100 shares of XYZ stock short at $100. He collects $10,000 in proceeds for his troubles. That money is deposited directly in his brokerage account.

A few months later, the price of XYZ has indeed fallen by 75% all the way to $25.

George decides he's not going to be greedy so he elects to buy the shares back or "cover" the trade, as it is known in trader-speak. He takes the $10,000 he received when he sold and spends $2,500 of it to buy back the shares and return them to his broker.

The $7,500 difference between what he received and what he used to buy his way out of the trade is his profit in this example, excluding transaction costs that I haven't included here for simplicity's sake.

Obviously the reverse is true, too. Had XYZ's price risen above $100, George would need more money to buy shares back, so the trade would have been a loss had he exited at that point.

My Favorite Stocks to Short Now

So how do you find the best "short" candidates?

That's like asking what flavor of ice cream you like. There are as many ways of finding compelling short candidates as there are ways of finding exciting upside opportunities. Some are technical, while others are fundamental.

I prefer a far simpler approach that combines social, technical, and fundamental data.

Media darlings make great short candidates because the hype machine is in high gear and people aren't thinking clearly about what a stock is really worth when it's in the headlines every morning for all the "right" reasons.

That was the case with Shake Shack Inc. (NYSE: SHAK) when I suggested Total Wealth readers short the company on May 22, 2015 - the very day it closed at its all-time high of $92.86. Anybody who followed along had the opportunity bank at least 65.6% by the following January. I brought other companies ripe for a fall from grace to your attention, too, including Wells Fargo, Twitter, GoPro, and Zoe's Kitchen, just to name a few.

Stocks with huge debt but very little free cash flow to service it are also great short candidates. You can identify 'em using any number of popular Internet screeners.

Technically speaking, I love charts that look like ski-jumps, especially when they're media-driven and the companies in question have no logical path to profits. Nothing goes up forever.

And I positively turn into a drooling idiot when I see companies that no longer have a valid investment premise because that means the business case for their survival is tenuous at best. Ultimately that translates to lower earnings, a complete failure on the bottom line and, hopefully, big profits in your bank account.

In that spirit, here are three of the "worst" companies I can find - all of which have triple-digit profit potential…

Stocks to Short No. 1: Sears Holdings Corp. (Nasdaq: SHLD)

This is an iconic brand that I don't think will be around in five years. Retail foot traffic continues to fall at a precipitous rate and the company is scrounging up billions in cash by selling its most valuable assets including - potentially - Kenmore, Craftsman, and even DieHard. I think bankruptcy and liquidation are all but inevitable.

Stocks to Short No. 2: JCPenney Company Inc. (NYSE: JCP)

The stock is struggling in a retail ghost town of once-proud brands. Same-store sales are unlikely to rise to the point where they create meaningful profits in an age where Amazon has permanently altered the retail bricks-and-mortar experience. It's only a matter of time.

And, of course…

Stocks to Short No. 3: Twitter Inc. (NYSE: TWTR)

The company has no redeeming value and suitors aren't just walking away. They're running in the other direction judging from a blizzard of interviews telling the investing public why "they're not interested," which is highly unusual given how confidential these things usually are.

More than 1 billion people have tried Twitter and gone elsewhere. I've got to believe that employees aren't far behind when you consider that management has used company stock aggressively as a compensation tool. At $16.83 a share, it's 40% below the IPO price and dropping. I think it's worth $1 a share at the moment - and that could be generous.

In closing, I've just scratched the surface. There's obviously more to short selling than the simple explanation I've provided today.

No doubt we could spend days on the finer points - and we will.

My goal today is simply that you understand the potential that comes from playing the market in both directions by choosing the world's "worst" companies as your profit play.

Believe me, you'll never forget the first time you score a triple-digit winner at a time when everybody else is running for cover.

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical Investing Post Listing

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted. You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.

Econintersect Investing

Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF

The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.

Keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

 navigate econintersect .com


Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2018 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved