econintersect .com

FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.

posted on 21 May 2015

Infographic Of The Day: How A Spacecraft Launch Abort Works

 A “tractor” escape system was used on the Apollo spacecraft.

Rockets in the launch escape tower pulled the crew capsule away from a malfunctioning rocket. NASA’s upcoming Orion capsule uses a similar tractor rocket.

A “pusher” escape system, such as the experimental Max Launch Abort System, puts the escape rockets at the bottom of the ship to push it up and away. SpaceX’s manned Dragon capsule will use a pusher system.

The first ejection seats for aircraft were developed in World War II. The only spacecraft to use ejection seats were the Soviet Vostok (which required the pilot to eject before landing), NASA’s two-man Gemini and the first four space shuttle launches, which also had only two crew members. As later shuttle missions carried up to 8 astronauts seated on two decks, the ejection seats were removed because not everyone could have been saved in an accident.

In 1958, NASA designer Maxime Faget equipped Mercury, America’s first manned spacecraft, with a tractor rocket to pull the entire capsule free in an emergency.

In 1983, an escape rocket pulled the three cosmonauts of Soyuz T-10-1 to safety when its booster exploded on the launch pad. As of 2015, this is the only case where an abort system saved a crew from a launchpad accident.

Apollo astronauts practiced firing their service module rocket engine to turn around and come home if mission-threatening failures occurred. In 1970, an explosion in Apollo 13’s service module made the big engine unreliable, so the smaller lunar module rocket engine was used instead.

A descending lunar module could abort its landing by casting off the descent stage and firing engines to return to the command module. Apollo 10 tested this abort procedure in 1969, during a dress rehearsal for Apollo 11’s landing attempt.
In the six seconds after the main engines ignited but before the solid-fueled boosters fired, computers could shut down the launch. This happened five times during the shuttle program. Once the solid-fueled boosters ignited, they could not be stopped.
The riskiest abort option, Return to Launch Site (RTLS), involved flipping the orbiter/external tank assembly around to send the craft back toward the East Coast of the United States. This abort mode was never tried, but astronauts were skeptical that it would work.
In 1985, STS-51-F (Challenger) became the only shuttle mission to experience an in-flight abort. One of the main engines shut down early. The shuttle failed to reach the correct speed and altitude, but it settled into a lower orbit.
Although it was never tested in real life, an ascending shuttle had the option to dump the booster rockets and external fuel tank to make an airport landing in one of several preselected trans-Atlantic sites.
Both fatal shuttle accidents happened at times when no abort options were available. After Challenger, NASA added a crew bailout option for a shuttle unable to make it safely to a landing site. The side hatch would be jettisoned, and an extending rod would be set up through the opening. Astronauts sliding out would be thrown clear of the orbiter’s wing before descending on parachutes.

[click here to enlarge infographic]

Chart explains some of the methods for aborting space missions.
Source All about our solar system, outer space and exploration.


Click here for Historical Infographic Post Listing

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted. You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.

Econintersect Infographics

Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF

The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.

Keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

 navigate econintersect .com


Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2018 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved