FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.

posted on 20 November 2017

How Quickly Do People Apply For Jobs?

from the St Louis Fed

-- this post authored by Paulina Restrepo-Echavarria

The volume and timing of job applications provide relevant information regarding labor market conditions. Moreover, they influence the strategies employers use to fill jobs, and those of people searching for work.

Using a database from DHI Group Inc.1linking nearly 80 million applications to almost 10 million online job postings, University of Chicago Booth School of Business Professor and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Steven J. Davis and I (Brenda) highlight new facts about the search behavior of employers and workers.

First, applications per posting drop sharply as postings age, as seen in the figure below.[2] After a job is posted:

  • 41 percent of all applications are received within the first 48 hours.
  • 56 percent arrive during the first 96 hours.

job applications

Furthermore, Davis and I found that postings are short-lived: Single-position postings have a mean duration of 9.8 days. The figure below shows the distribution of single-position postings by time elapsed from first to last active date.

filling jobs

Tracking postings and applications second-by-second, Davis and I are able to offer a new, more detailed view of the hiring process. Our measure of average posting duration accounts for roughly one-fourth of mean vacancy duration for similar jobs in the Jobs Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Thus, the “search" phase of hiring process - during which employers solicit and accept applications - is far shorter than the “selection" phase - during which employers screen and interview applicants, make and negotiate an offer, and wait for a decision.

How Employers Should Process Applications

The timing of application flows influences employers’ optimal search strategy. If most job seekers apply within a short period and there are no ongoing costs of posting a vacancy, employers should gather and review a batch of applications, rather than evaluating each one sequentially as they arrive.2

Davis and my findings regarding the concentration of applications in young vacancies, coupled with short posting durations relative to vacancy durations, weigh in favor of a nonsequential strategy.

How Job Seekers Should Apply

If employers review applications in batches, there will be delays between the submission of an application and the employer’s selection of a recruit.3 This creates incentives for job seekers to adopt a nonsequential search strategy as well, that is, to submit several applications at once rather than wait to hear back from each application before submitting the next one. Consistent with this theoretical implication, Davis and I found that job seekers submit applications for multiple job openings within the same 24-hour period.

Notes and References

1 The following results refer to job postings in technology sectors, software development, other computer-related occupations, financial services, business and management consulting, engineering, and a variety of other professional occupations.

2 Davis, Steven J.; and Samaniego de la Parra, Brenda. “Application Flows." Working Paper, March 7, 2017.

3 Morgan, Peter B.; and Manning, Richard. "Optimal Search." Econometrica, July 1985, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 923-944, and Van Ommeren, Jos; and Russo, Giovanni. "Firm Recruitment Behavior: Sequential or Non-sequential Search." Oxford Bulletin of Economic Statistics, June 2014, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 432-455.

4 Morgan, Peter B.; and Manning, Richard. "Optimal Search." Econometrica, July 1985, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 923-944, and Gautier, Pieter A. "Non-Sequential Search, Screening Externalities and the Public Good role of Recruitment Offices." Economic Modelling, March 2002, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 179-196.

Additional Resources



Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical News Post Listing

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted. You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.

Econintersect Contributors

Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF

The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.

Keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government



Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved