posted on 18 January 2017
Written by Frank Li
Too short-sighted! Fukuyama did not seem to understand the big, complex, and plural nature of the human nature and history!
In his 2014 article (At the 'End of History' Still Stands Democracy), Fukuyama writes:
Fukuyama further states:
But he followed with a list of challenges China faces, with the conclusion that
Too close-minded! Fukuyama appears to be so obsessed with [liberal] democracy (What is Democracy, Anyway?) that he has simply failed to be open-minded about the new "China model", which is also known as "state capitalism".
Overall, Fukuyama appears to have three major problems:
Most problematic is that Fukuyama appears to be locked in his past, twisting the current affairs to fit back into his short-sighted and out-of-date view of some 25 years ago. Because of that, he is still very bullish on the West, despite the fact that the West has gone almost from heaven to hell over the past 25 years, but very bearish on China, in spite of China's economic miracle.
Twenty-five years are a long time for a human being. Unfortunately, Fukuyama seems to be mired in the past and unable to change over the past 25 years. But I did! For example, twenty-five years ago, I was full of sympathy to the students at Tiananmen Square. However, 10 years ago, I concluded that, despite the horror, it was a good thing, overall for China, to put-down the student-led pro-democracy demonstration in 1989. In other words, I have become older and wiser. For more, read: Tiananmen Square Protest and Put-Down, 25 Years Later.
Twenty-five years are an instant in human history.
Instead, keep an open-mind and appreciate its significance and implication with a better understanding of Chinese history as well as human history.
My view is opposite to Fukuyama's. I am bullish on China's ascension as the West clearly is in decline. Specifically on the U.S. vs. China, the image below shows the bottom line.
Very importantly, I believe the world will continue to exist with multiple forms of government. While the world will continue to be led by several countries (Three New Kingdoms), no country or ideology will dominate for very long, and any attempt to do so will fail.
Who will be the winner in the perpetual evolution of human history?
Specifically on the U.S. vs. China, which system has proven to be more adaptable: China's or America's?
China's, of course! We, America, have been sleeping with the same political system for more than 200 years, changing for the worse only, over the past few decades, at least! Why? Because that is what democracy is predestined to be - Democracy is simply not a valid form of government! For more, read my new book: American Democracy.
In summary, not only is democracy not the end of history, it has replaced communism as the worst man-made destructive force on earth in the 21st century!
>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<
This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved