econintersect.com
       
  

FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.



posted on 15 January 2017

Updated Survey On Hiring And Wages

from the Richmond Fed

-- this post authored by Joseph Mengedoth

Earlier this year, we reported the results of a special survey on hiring and wages. A similar survey was conducted in November. In addition to asking employers about their plans for hiring, the November survey asked participants why they might or might not be increasing employment and the role of wages in attracting and retaining employees.

The results from our most recent survey on hiring and wages indicated that business expectations for hiring over the next 12 months remain about on pace with the expectations reported earlier in 2016. Meanwhile, wage increases to attract new employees seemed more widespread with this most recent survey. Wage increases for retention purposes, on the other hand, were about on par with the results of the previous two surveys but differed markedly from the result in May 2015.

Employment

We heard from 188 businesses in response to our November 2016 survey on hiring and wages, of which 40 percent said that they were planning to increase employment over the next 12 months. On the other hand, 11 percent said that they were planning to decrease employment over the same period, and the remaining participants indicated no change in employment.

As can be seen from the chart below, results in May and November of 2016 are remarkably similar but differ slightly from the results in 2015. In November 2015, only 37 percent of employers polled said they were planning on hiring over the next year. In May 2015, however, half of the respondents indicated plans to increase employment.

Over the next 12 months, do you expect employment at your firm to increase, remain unchanged, or decrease?

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Both in the most recent survey and in the November 2015 survey, participants who intended to increase employment were asked to give the top three reasons for expecting to raise employment. The charts below show that the most important factor in both survey periods was that the expected growth of sales was high; that response received both the highest number of votes for “most important" and the greatest number of combined votes. The second and third most commonly selected answers were the same in both surveys but flipped in order. In the most recent survey, “need skills not possessed by current staff" had very slightly more total responses than “current staff are overworked."

What are the three most important factors behind your plans to increase employment?

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

What are the three most important factors behind your plans to increase employment?

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Just considering the "most important" selections (the dark green segments) in the November 2016 survey, the second most selected answer given was "other factors."In the open-ended comment box that followed, some of the answers given included replacing staff that recently left, preparing for upcoming retirements, and business expansion into new markets. Last November, the "other factors" answer was also the second most popular response for "most important." From that survey, the write-in answers were more focused around adding capacity, expanding product lines, and expansion into new markets.

From the very first chart, recall that the percent of survey responses from this November who indicated an expected decrease in employment was 11 percent, compared to 12 percent in November 2015. Additionally, 48 percent of participants said they had no plans to change employment this November, and 50 percent said the same last November. Those participants were asked to select the top three factors restraining their hiring plans. The charts below show the results of that question for this November and last November.

What are the three most important factors restraining your hiring plans?

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

What are the three most important factors restraining your hiring plans?

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

The above shows that, when asked to select reasons for not hiring, the three most popular answers were the same in both years when you consider the combined number of responses. However, if you consider just the "most important" factor (the dark green segments), this year the top response was that expected sales were low, while last year the most important factor was difficulty finding workers with the required skills.

Wages

The first question in the survey about wages asked those who are actively seeking to hire workers right now if they are raising starting wages for most positions, only select positions, or not raising starting wages at all. The below chart shows the responses to this question for the past several surveys.

What best describes your use of changes in starting wages to attract new hires: raising for most jobs, raising for only some jobs, or not raising?

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

As you can see in the chart above, in the current survey period, 29 percent of respondents answered that they were raising starting wages for most categories, which was the largest share to give that answer over the last four surveys. If you combine the responses for "most jobs" and "only some jobs," the current survey looks very similar to the ones in May 2016 and May 2015, all of which were considerably higher than in November 2015.

Lastly, the survey asked all participants if they are making any changes to wages to retain existing employees. The possible answers were the same as the prior question on starting wages. As is clear from the chart below, firms who responded to the survey were more likely to raise wages for new employees than for existing employees. Only 18 percent of survey participants indicated wage increases for retention purposes for most jobs, which was somewhat similar to the results of the previous two surveys. In May 2015, however, there were markedly more responses indicating wage increases for most current job holders.

What best describes your use of changes in starting wages to retain existing employees: raising for most jobs, raising for only some jobs, or not raising?

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond


Disclaimer

Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond or the Federal Reserve System.

Source

https://www.richmondfed.org/research/ regional_economy/ regional_matters/2016/ rm_12_21_2016_special_survey

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical News Post Listing










Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, using Livefyre just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.



You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.





Econintersect Contributors


search_box

Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF


The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.


Take a look at what is going on inside of Econintersect.com
Main Home
Analysis Blog
Democratic Development Lowers the Cost of Credit
Is Growing Household Debt An Economic Counter-Dynamic?
News Blog
China's Continuing Credit Boom
Infographic Of The Day: Ten Interview Questions That Make You Sound Dumb
Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Down, Oil Up, Dollar And Gold Steady, UK Inflation, 'Moonlight' Wins Oscar, LSE Merger May Be Off, Greek Banks, India Going Green And More
Most Read Articles Last Week Ending 25 February
How British Businesses Helped The Confederacy Fight The American Civil War
Where You Can Surf A Lot For A Little In The EU
'I Can Live With Either One': Palestine, Israel And The Two-state Solution
Where Snapchat's Users Come From
What We Read Today 26 February 2017
INAUGURATION DAY: A Bad Lip Reading Of Donald Trump's Inauguration
Did The Dodd-Frank Act Make The Financial System Safer?
A Close Look At The Decline Of Homeownership - Part Five Of Five
Do Institutional Investors Chase Returns?
Investing Blog
The Week Ahead: Reality And Stock Prices
Snapchat Still Has Some Growing Up To Do
Opinion Blog
What Do You Call A Lie Constructed From Other Lies?
Why Winning The French Presidential Election Could Be A Poisoned Chalice
Precious Metals Blog
Deflation And Gold: A Contrarian View
Live Markets
24Feb2017 Market Close: Wall Street Rose From Session Lows To Close In The Green Near The Unchanged Line, Short-Term Indicators And Analysts Questioning Continuing Bull Run
Amazon Books & More






.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government





























 navigate econintersect.com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved