econintersect.com
       
  

FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.



posted on 07 January 2017

What Henry VIII's Break With Rome Tells Us About Parliament's Role In Brexit

from The Conversation

-- this post authored by Cathy Shrank, University of Sheffield

As Britain awaits a ruling from its supreme court on whether the government can trigger Article 50 to leave the European Union without consulting parliament, the relationship between law and politics has come under intense and sometimes hostile scrutiny. Gina Miller, the lead claimant bringing the case against the government, and the high court judges who decided in favour of parliament’s involvement, have been derided as "traitors" and "enemies of the people".

The situation has also exposed an ambiguity about where executive power properly lies in a representative democracy: with the government, acting by royal prerogative, or with parliament. Yet parliament and a distinctive legal system have long been a focus for English national identity. They were particularly important at a formative moment for English sovereignty: when Henry VIII broke with the Church of Rome in the early 1530s.

Despite Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s recent caricature of history, when he accused the prime minister, Theresa May, of acting like Henry VIII, the mechanisms that the Tudor king used to break with Rome were far from autocratic.

Parliament and Rome

Masterminded by his chief minister, Thomas Cromwell, the split from Rome relied on a series of acts of parliament. These bolstered royal powers: England became the only nation where the head of state was also head of its church. However, the acts did so by embedding the authority of the crown within parliament and by celebrating the common law. While the rest of Europe - including Scotland, then a separate kingdom - followed the civil code, based on Roman law, common law was distinctively English.

The 1533 Act in Restraint of Appeals was a foundation in this process. Its opening statement asserted the monarch’s independence from foreign authorities:

By diverse, sundry old, authentic histories and chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this realm of England is an empire.

But even as it proclaims royal supremacy, it endorses the role of parliament - a tripartite body, comprising king, nobility, and commons - in making the “sundry ordinances, laws, statutes, and provisions" which ensure English liberties.

Parliament’s place became central. UK parliament, via flickr, CC BY-NC-ND

Cromwell’s appeal to history (the old, authentic chronicles) was a legal fiction, but - in its reliance on precedent - it demonstrates how the statute was shaped by common-law thinking.

Move against foreign influence

Cromwell ordered that the act be widely disseminated: by preachers, proclamations, and printed copies affixed to every church door. As a result, it had a far-reaching effect. It established the sovereignty of the crown in parliament, and it enshrined a concept of Englishness which was suspicious of the interference of supranational jurisdictions and which took pride in the autonomy of its crown, church, and idiosyncratic legal system.

When the ballad-maker Martin Parker listed the institutions which would protect England from the foreign influence of Jesuit priests in a broadside ballad circa 1624, it was quite usual that - alongside “our king" - he should name “our laws" and “our Parliament Royal".

This conception that England was a “mixed" constitution was not novel. The lawyer John Fortescue outlined it nearly a century earlier in the late 1460s in De laudibus legum Angliae (In praise of the law of England), which explains that royal authority derived from parliament: parliament passed laws, which were upheld by judges, operating independently of the monarch.

Fortescue’s theory gained purchase under the Tudors. De laudibus was first printed in 1545-6 and eight further editions followed before 1600. It was translated into English in 1567, adorned with a title page celebrating the exceptionalism of English law as excelling “all other laws of the world".

Not above the law

The conviction that English monarchs were not above the law became integral to English political identity. In the early 17th century, as tension between crown and parliament grew, one manuscript dialogue argued for holding annual parliaments, thus removing from royal prerogative the right to summon parliament.

Its anonymous author compared the law to the “sinews" that “knit … the body in perfect unity" and parliament to the “heart … whereby the body is nourished and maintained". Within the logic of this metaphor, the king (“the politic head") cannot “change the laws of that body, or withdraw from the people their proper substance".

Belief in the primacy of law and parliament entered popular discourse. Around 1555, during the reign of Mary I, a short pamphlet, printed on a single sheet of paper, posed certain questions" to be “demanded … by the noble realm of England". The pamphlet delegitimised Mary for violating the laws of the land and positioned parliament as a representative body, constituted not to do the “pleasure … of his prince", but to “speak … for the profit of the poor man and the wealth of the realm".

When newspapers attack judges as traitors and Corbyn compares May’s Brexit strategy to Henry VIII’s, both the papers and the Labour leader would be well-advised to revisit their Tudor history. Henry’s break with Europe was enacted through parliament. It also endorsed English common law, determined according to precedent by an independent judiciary. Miller’s case, now being reviewed in the supreme court, is not a betrayal of British democracy: it embodies it.

The ConversationCathy Shrank, Professor of Tudor and Renaissance Literature, University of Sheffield

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical News Post Listing










Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted. You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.




Econintersect Contributors


search_box

Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF


The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.


Take a look at what is going on inside of Econintersect.com
Main Home
Analysis Blog
The Job Guarantee, Wage-Price Inflation And Alternative Solutions: Part 1
The Job Guarantee, Wage-Price Inflation And Alternative Solutions: Part 2
News Blog
Durable Goods New Orders Improved in February 2017
Why NASA Won't Send Humans To Venus
Rail Week Ending 18 March 2017: Short Term Rate of Growth Slowing
How Taxes And Transfers Affect The Work Incentives Of People With Low And Moderate Income
How Tourism Affects China's Current Account Surplus
Infographic Of The Day: The Habits Of Highly Successful Entrepreneurs
To Where The Maple Syrup Flows
The U.S. Has The Most Expensive Healthcare System In The World
Five Maps That Will Change How You See The World
What We Read Today 16 March 2017 - Special Public Edition
Hate Groups In The U.S. Are Flourishing
What We Read Today 23 March 2017
March 2017 Kansas City Fed Manufacturing At Highest Level Since March 2011
Investing Blog
Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Mixed, Dollar, Oil Up, Gold Down, Health Care Vote Today, Calif. Solar, Russia And Poison, Mumbai Bridge, Sanctions Cause Suffering In N. Korea, And More
Tesla Is Playing The Long Game
Opinion Blog
Time To Stop Rewarding Economists For Bad Behaviour
The American Dream: An Endangered Ethos
Precious Metals Blog
These Gold Stocks Will Produce Much Bigger Gains Than Gold Itself
Live Markets
24Mar2017 Pre-Market Commentary: Looks Like Markets Will Flatline
Amazon Books & More






.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government































 navigate econintersect.com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved