FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.

posted on 24 December 2016

Pinching Productivity

from Lakshman Achuthan, Co-Founder and Chief Operations Officer of ECRI

There’s a widespread expectation, based on President-elect Donald Trump’s statements, of major tax reforms that incentivize corporations to repatriate trillions of dollars in profits stashed overseas, and invest that money within the U.S. Whether this is likely to happen in practice is a key question. For example, when asked earlier this month what his firm - one of the biggest potential beneficiaries of such tax reforms - would do if it could repatriate overseas capital, Cisco Systems CEO Chuck Robbins said that the money would be used for "a combination of dividends, buybacks, as well as M&A activity."

The results of the Q4 2016 Business Roundtable CEO Survey suggest that Mr. Robbins’ cohorts may agree with him. Because it was conducted between October 26 and November 16, the survey reflects post-election expectations only in part. Even so, it’s notable that the percent of CEOs planning to increase hiring popped up to a one-year high (blue line in chart), but the percent planning to boost capital spending actually declined (red line).

The jury is still out as to what corporations will actually do in response to Mr. Trump’s policies. But if it amounts to more hiring and less capital spending, as the recent survey suggests, that pincer movement shown in the chart would be problematic for productivity.

Please recall that - as we explained in a paper published last summer - the key reason for the productivity growth downshift following the Great Recession is that, after being in the ballpark of 1%, more or less, in the entire post-World War II period, the contribution of capital intensity turned negative following the recession despite cheap money. Because the ratio of capital to hours worked defines capital intensity, greater hiring coupled with less capital investment - as suggested by the CEO survey - would damage, not bolster, this critical driver of productivity growth.

In essence, without a revival in the contribution of capital intensity, we can’t expect much of a recovery in labor productivity growth. Given the simple math we’ve long highlighted - potential GDP growth equals potential labor force growth plus labor productivity growth - sustained strength in GDP growth would require a major pickup in productivity. And that won’t happen unless businesses make major productivity-boosting investments.

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical News Post Listing

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, using Livefyre just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.

You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.

Econintersect Contributors


Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF

The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.

Take a look at what is going on inside of
Main Home
Analysis Blog
Tax Reform: The Good, the Bad, and the Really Ugly, Part Three
A New Era of Central Banking?
News Blog
When Evidence Says No, But Doctors Say Yes
Pacific Rim States Affected By Trump's War On Free Trade
Real Paleo Diet: Early Hominids Ate Just About Everything
Amazon's Global Workforce Is Growing Rapidly
What We Read Today 23 February 2017
February 2017 Kansas City Fed Manufacturing At Highest Level Since June 2011
Lost In The Sixties-The Winds Of Change
January 2017 CFNAI Super Index Moving Average Statistically Unchanged
18 February 2017 Initial Unemployment Claims Rolling Average Insignificantly Improves
Jihadism: An Eerily Familiar Threat
Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Forecast For February 2017
Infographic Of The Day: Guide To Tipping
Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Mostly Down, Oil Up, Dollar And Gold Steady, Extreme Arctic Warmth, Town Halls, More Water In Calif, UK Bogus Green Power, Mosul Airport Attacked And More
Investing Blog
Can You Spot Low Risk Entries?
Technical Thoughts: Trading, Luck Or Skill?
Opinion Blog
Fed Up: Culture Shock
Kenneth Arrow's Ignored Impossibility Theorem
Precious Metals Blog
Deflation And Gold: A Contrarian View
Live Markets
23Feb2017 Market Close: Wall Street Closes Mixed Near The Unchanged Line, Nasdaq Closed Down Fractionally, The DOW Closes Up 35 Points, Crude And The US Dollar Remain Mostly Unchanged
Amazon Books & More

.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government



Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved