FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.

posted on 01 December 2016

Why Journalistic 'Balance' Is Failing The Public

from The Conversation

-- this post authored by Bruce Mutsvairo, Northumbria University, Newcastle

Renowned reporter Christiane Amanpour recently told a conference of the Committee to Protect Journalists that they should aim for truth over neutrality.

Watching the recent US presidential campaign unfold, she said she was “shocked by the exceptionally high bar put before one candidate and the exceptionally low bar put before the other candidate". She went on:

It appeared much of the media got itself into knots trying to differentiate between balance, objectivity, neutrality, and crucially, truth.

We cannot continue the old paradigm - let’s say like over global warming, where 99.9% of the empirical scientific evidence is given equal play with the tiny minority of deniers.

But surely truth is a matter of perspective - and shouldn’t a journalist aim instead to report impartially and in a balanced manner? Eight years ago, Carl Bernstein - of Watergate fame - told a packed audience attending the annual Perugia International Journalism Festival that good journalism revolved around “trying to obtain the best attainable version of the truth". But in an era where news can be shipped to your phone in a matter of seconds, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish truth from lies.

And even truth-seeking journalists could easily be pressured into inadvertently or even intentionally covering stories in order to satisfy a false or imaginary sense of balance. You can’t blame them. The concept of “balance" - or as its critics refer to it “false equivalence" - has long been a key precept of journalism. It epitomises the idealistic notion that journalists ought to be fair to all so that, whenever they write a story, they give equal weight to both sides of the argument.

But, especially in our new “post-truth" era, this doesn’t always work to the benefit of the public good. Here are some examples of where balance doesn’t necessarily work.

US presidential election

Supporters of Hillary Clinton are still smarting about the coverage of her email server which was used to balance out the whiff of scandal that dogged Donald Trump’s campaign. Of course, Trump’s supporters also bitterly complained that he was unfairly targeted by the mainstream press. But is it right to seek to balance reporting in a presidential campaign where one candidate has a question mark over her use of a private email account (something her predecessor Colin Powell has admitted to doing) and the other candidate is linked to myriad scandals, including questionable tax practises, multiple bankruptcies and sexual assault allegations (which he denies).

The pursuit of balance is impractical - but this doesn’t mean journalists should pull back from investigating important stories. New York Times public editor Liz Spayd was right when she recently defended her colleagues in the wake of growing protests from readers who complained about the paper’s investigations into whether countries that had made donations to the Clinton Foundation had received special treatment from Hillary Clinton’s State Department (they found nothing). Spayd says that the danger of this is clear:

Fear of false balance is a creeping threat to the role of the media because it encourages journalists to pull back from their responsibility to hold power accountable. All power, not just certain individuals, however vile they might seem.

But you can’t help but have some sympathy for Jacob Weisberg of Slate magazine, quoted in Spayd’s article, who said that journalists used to covering candidates who were like “apples and oranges" were presented with a candidate, Trump, who was like “rancid meat".


In a sense, the reporting of the EU referendum campaign was anything but balanced. A study by Loughborough academics found that - when you took newspaper circulation into account - there was a weight of 82% to 18% in favour of articles arguing the case for the Leave campaign.

Given that the majority of experts believed that leaving the European Union would adversely affect the UK economy, had their perspectives been fairly reported against the few genuine experts who supported the arguments for Leave, few would realistically have expected the eventual result.

Overreliance on balance can itself lead to unwanted bias. A study by Jeremy Burke concluded that the public suffers as a result of the fact that many media organisations, who are desperately seeking neutrality in their reporting, directly or indirectly withhold important information.

Climate change

The environmental debate has provided perhaps the most egregious examples of why balance is failing journalism and the public. As Amanpour highlighted in her speech, in spite of overwhelming scientific evidence linking humans to global warming, news media eager to provide balance to the debate continue to challenge this notion.

Like everyone, journalists have every right to challenge scientific knowledge. But simply challenging it, or presenting dubious assertions for the sake of balance can skew the debate - against public interest.

Amanpour exhorted her audience to action, saying:

“We must fight against normalisation of the unacceptable."

One way to do this is to recognise that this is what false balance can do. And to realise, once and for all, that it is failing journalists and their audiences.

The ConversationBruce Mutsvairo, Senior Lecturer in Journalism, Northumbria University, Newcastle

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical News Post Listing

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, using Livefyre just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.

You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.

Econintersect Contributors


Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF

The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.

Take a look at what is going on inside of
Main Home
Analysis Blog
Minsky’s Theory of Asset Prices: Why Minsky Was NOT a Neo-Monetarist
The BuildZoom And Urban Economics Lab Index: Third Quarter 2016
News Blog
Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Mixed, Dollar Steady, Oil Up, Top US Poll Priority Is Health Care, Tough Questions For Tom Price, Russia Has Buyer's Remorse, Mexico Fears Trump And More
Documentary Of The Week: Value And Thermodynamics
Can Serena Make It 23
Number Of Bitcoin ATMs By Country
How Old Is Our Moon?
Advantages And Disadvantages Of The EU According To Business Leaders
What We Read Today 18 January 2017
January 2017 Beige Book: Reading Between The Lines - Little Change in the Rate of Growth
15 Recent Science Discoveries You Wont Believe
December 2016 Industrial Production Up - Now In Expansion
December 2016 CPI: Year-over-Year Inflation Rate Now 2.1%
Advent Of Trade Reporting For U.S. Treasury Securities
Infographic Of The Day: Why Pets Make Us Happy
Investing Blog
Technical Nuggets: Is There A Trump-Air Pocket Ahead?
Technical Thoughts: Three Trading Ideas
Opinion Blog
A New Deal With Capitalism Requires A Revolution In Politics And Markets
A Letter To Warren Buffett And Charlie Munger About Hiring Proven Whistleblowers
Precious Metals Blog
Four Catalysts Drive Gold And Silver For 2017
Live Markets
18Jan2017 Market Close: US Stock Markets Closed Mostly Higher, Crude Prices Slipping Further, US Dollar Trending Higher, Yellen Says US Economy Improving
Amazon Books & More

.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government



Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved