econintersect.com
       
  

FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.



posted on 19 November 2016

What Trump Means For US Trade And Globalisation

from The Conversation

-- this post authored by Billy Melo Araujo, Queen's University Belfast

Trade was one of the cornerstones of Donald Trump’s campaign for the US presidency. And, as observers across the board scurry to make sense of what a Trump presidency will actually look like, it is likely to be an area of US foreign policy that will receive significant attention from the president-elect in the next four years.

Trump promised a radical trade agenda. He vowed to withdraw from the the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal, which has not yet been ratified, and renegotiate the North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA) - America’s trade deal with Canada and Mexico - “to protect US workers". He pledged to aggressively challenge countries that violate international trade agreements and, in particular, bring cases against China for using unfair subsidies and currency manipulation.

In many ways, Trump’s tough stance is not too dissimilar to that adopted by the likes of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton during their own presidential campaigns. Trade bashing is, in fact, a fairly well-established practice among US presidential candidates.

The difference this time, though, is that Trump may be a president who is actually willing to deliver on this rhetoric. Not necessarily because he actually opposes free trade, but because, unlike many promises made during his campaign, those relating to trade policy could be achieved with relative ease.

While repealing Obamacare or withdrawing from the Paris Climate Change Treaty would be politically contentious and involve lengthy and complex legislative processes, most of Trump’s trade policy proposals are bureaucratic in nature. With the exception of the renegotiation of NAFTA (which requires an agreement with Mexico and Canada), Trump’s trade policy is perfectly feasible.

The NAFTA agreement with Canada and Mexico will be hard to repeal. EPA/Daniel Aguilar

By far the most significant commitment would be a rejection of the TPP. The TPP, a free trade agreement which encompasses most Pacific Rim economies (but excludes China), ranks among an emerging group of large, regional trade agreements that are significant not just in terms of the size of the economies they represent, but also in terms of their geopolitical and economic importance. As well as TPP, these include the EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, or TTIP, and the China-backed Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), which would include ASEAN economies and India (but not the US).

These big regional trade agreements were designed by the US as tools to reassert US leadership in global economic governance by countering the growing influence of China and promoting US “rules of the road" on trade.

A no-brainer

Despite this, doing away with TPP would be a no-brainer for Trump. It would be fairly easy to achieve; the Obama administration has already confirmed that it won’t seek to push the agreement in the lame-duck session and, for Trump, once sworn in, it would simply be a matter of not putting it to a vote before Congress. Most importantly, it would also be a hugely and immediately popular move domestically.

Free trade - and the free trade agreements which promote it - have become politically toxic in Western liberal democracies. In the US, globalisation and free trade are blamed for job losses in the manufacturing sector and wage depression more generally. As a result, Trump had huge support in Rust Belt states, where (mostly white) blue-collar workers are a key constituent and tipped the balance of votes in his favour.

Trump won Rust Belt states like Ohio. dankeck/flickr

The assumption that putting an end to free trade will restore manufacturing jobs to these parts of America is to a large degree incorrect. But the presidential candidates did nothing to dispel them. To do so would be tantamount to electoral suicide.

And this phenomenon is not unique to the US. It can also be found in Europe, where there is mounting opposition to TTIP, but also the EU’s recent struggles to get its member states to sign off on CETA, the EU-Canada trade deal.

Reforming the fundamentals?

Opposition to trade agreements is not just a by-product of the populism that now pervades politics in the US and Europe and feeds off anti-globalist sentiment. It also taps into legitimate concerns about the continued relevance of free trade and the idea of an international trading system exclusively designed to promote economic liberalism - that is, to remove government constraints on economic operators and markets. Ironically, it is the US that has been one of economic liberalism’s biggest proponents since World War II.

But not everyone has evenly benefited from free trade and economic liberalisation. And so there are growing calls to manage the effects of globalisation. Some have called for the development of policies which would redistribute its costs by re-investing in areas which have lost out from globalisation. Others have advocated a shift in emphasis of trade agreements away from economic liberalisation and towards issues such as labour and environmental protection.

Of course, Trump does not propose to go that far. There is no sign of reforming the fundamentals of the international trading regime. Trump’s promise is far more basic. It is one based on a retreat from free trade with, perhaps, a dash of old-fashioned economic isolationism. That being so, Trump discarding the TPP in the short to medium-term is a fairly safe bet.

The irony is inescapable. The TPP was designed by the US specifically to counteract its waning influence in Asia and combat the rise of China. The TTIP was espoused as an essential tool to consolidate trade rules that reflect the US’s interests and values. And yet the likelihood is that both agreements may eventually be destroyed by a president whose entire sales pitch has been based on reasserting the US’s greatness on the global stage.

Meanwhile, China - which only decided to pursue its own big regional trade agreements as a response to the TPP - is on the verge of finalising its RECP pan-Asia-Pacific trade deal. This would represent around 40% of global GDP and would not only firmly cement its position of leadership in the region, but also strengthen its role as a rule-maker in the global trading system.

The ConversationBilly Melo Araujo, Lecturer - EU and International Economic law, Queen's University Belfast

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical News Post Listing










Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, using Livefyre just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.



You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.





Econintersect Contributors


search_box

Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF


The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.


Take a look at what is going on inside of Econintersect.com
Main Home
Analysis Blog
The Surprising Pevalence of Surprises in Export Specialisation
The Destruction of the Existing Workforce
News Blog
Badass Grandpa Tokyo Drift!
Hurricane Matthew Clocks Top Wind Speed For 2016 At 101 MPH
Consumer Debt Growth May Have Stalled In Q3
Measuring Americans' Expectations Following The 2016 Election
Infographic Of The Day: Seven Negotiation Techniques
Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Mixed, Europe Lower, Oil And Dollar Down, US Oil Production Climbs, EM Bonds Pain Coming, No Trump Tax Returns, Syria Peace Talks Without US And More
Most Read Articles Last Week Ending 21 January
Why Hospitals Have Got It Wrong When It Comes To Antibiotic Resistance
The Rise Of Music Streaming Continues
60% Of Primate Species Now Threatened With Extinction, Says Major New Study
Most Attendees At Davos 2017 Come From The U.S.
What We Read Today 22 January 2017
Redneck Inventions
Investing Blog
Market And Sector Analysis 22 January 2017
Stock Market Bubble Now Second Largest Of Past 100 Years
Opinion Blog
Trumping World Trade
Retailing In America: Bricks And Torture
Precious Metals Blog
A Slow Start For The Week Would Be Constructive For Gold
Live Markets
23Jan2017 Market Update: Wall Street Slides Along With Crude Prices And The US Dollar, Analysts Betting Trump Effect Is Over
Amazon Books & More






.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government































 navigate econintersect.com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved