FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.

posted on 28 March 2016

Group Protests Zero-Rating Plans For Internet Service

Written by

ISPs Have Schemes that can Abuse Customers and Damage the Open Interent

Econintersect: Today, New America's Open Technology Institute (OTI) joined over fifty other organizations in calling on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to address the proliferation of zero-rating schemes by various Internet service providers (ISPs). The letter describes the harms posed by these business arrangements to the open Internet, consumer choice, and online competition.


Zero-rating refers to the Internet service provider practice of exempting certain types of Internet traffic from a subscriber's data caps. Data caps refer to limits on the amount of data that a consumer can use each month without being assessed an additional fee from their ISP. Currently, companies with zero-rating offerings include Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.

If ISPs are allowed to both set data caps and control what types of traffic are exempt from those caps, they are able to unfairly concentrate their power over consumers and competitors, allowing them to pick Internet "winners and losers" and create new impositions on websites and applications. Zero-rating harms also fall disproportionately on low-income communities and communities of color, who tend to rely on mobile networks as their primary or exclusive means of Internet access.

The signatories warn that if the FCC does not investigate zero-rating practices, ISPs will continue to seek ways to monetize capped broadband service at the expense of an open Internet and those who rely on it.

The following statement was made by Sarah Morris, Senior Counsel and Director of Open Internet Policy at OTI:

"Innovation and growth on the Internet is dependent upon an ecosystem of abundant capacity. Unfortunately, we have already seen ISPs combining zero-rating and data cap practices to impose artificial limits on the bandwidth that consumers can use, monetize that scarcity, and then praise their zero-rating schemes as a generous benefit to their customers. In reality, these zero-rating arrangements demonstrate that the caps themselves are arbitrary and, in many instances, unnecessary. Zero-rating plans present a variety of harms by distorting competition, hampering innovation, and limiting consumer choice - all harms the Open Internet rules were meant to prevent. The FCC must enforce its rules and give zero-rating plans, and the data caps on which they are based, the scrutiny they deserve."

Here is the letter submitted.

March 28, 2016

Chairman Wheeler

Federal Communications Commission

445 12th Street SW

Washington, DC 20554

As we pass the first anniversary of the FCC's landmark net neutrality rules, Internet service providers (ISPs) like Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, and T­Mobile are using new "zero-­rating" plans to undermine the spirit and the text of the rules. Zero­-rating allows ISPs to exempt certain content from customers' data caps. As currently offered, these plans enable ISPs to pick winners and losers online or create new tolls for websites and applications.

As a result, they present a serious threat to the Open Internet: they distort competition, thwart innovation, threaten free speech, and restrict consumer choice  -  all harms the rules were meant to prevent. These harms tend to fall disproportionately on low-­income communities and communities of color, who tend to rely on mobile networks as their primary or exclusive means of access to the Internet.

The FCC's Open Internet Order protects the Internet as an open platform for commerce and innovation and ensures that Internet users control the content they access, not their ISPs. Importantly, the FCC's rules apply to both mobile and fixed networks. That means all users must have access to an open Internet, whether they connect using a smartphone, a tablet, or a personal computer.

Zero­-rating plans come in a variety of forms. Comcast's plan directly favors its own content over competitors'. Plans from AT&T and Verizon charge application providers a fee in order to be zero-­rated. T-­Mobile zero-­rates select video providers but only those that meet its substantial and sometimes burdensome technical requirements. It also throttles all online video, a whole class of applications, while allowing other classes to reach the user without interference. All of these plans violate net neutrality in specific ways.

The Open Internet rules say that ISPs cannot pick winners and losers online by slowing down some applications and services while speeding up others. Now Comcast has identified another way to pick winners and losers: It technically favors its own service above competitors' and exempts its own video application Stream TV from customers' data caps while counting all competing services toward those caps. This is a textbook case of an ISP abusing its power for its own competitive advantage.

The rules also say that ISPs can't charge websites and applications for access to a fast lane. Yet, AT&T and Verizon created a new toll by instead charging websites and applications for exemption from customers' data caps. These "sponsored data" plans motivate ISPs to keep data caps low in order to create pressure for companies to pay to circumvent the caps. These plans distort user choice by pushing people toward websites with deep pockets and away from smaller applications who can't afford the toll. This includes start­ups, small players, and non­commercial providers. In this way, sponsored data plans create the same kinds of harms to innovation and free speech as online fast lanes.

Finally, the rules say that ISPs cannot be gatekeepers that determine which applications can be successful, including by treating some applications or classes of applications differently than others. T-­Mobile is exempting the content of select video providers from customers' data caps as part of its Binge On program, but only if they meet its substantial  -  and proprietary  -  technical requirements. These requirements make it difficult for many start­ups, small players, and non­commercial speakers to participate in the program, creating lasting harms to innovation, competition, and free speech online. Moreover, by limiting Binge On to video providers, the program favors video as a class over all other classes of applications. In addition, in order to make Binge On work, T­-Mobile is throttling a large portion of video traffic across its network, a form of application­-specific discrimination. While we recognize that T-­Mobile has made adjustments to its offering recently, our network neutrality concerns nonetheless hold.

In every case, websites that have not negotiated with a particular ISP now face new barriers to reaching that ISP's Internet users. These practices distort competition, stifle innovation, limit user choice, harm free speech, and drive up prices. In their current iterations, each of these plans run afoul of both the spirit of net neutrality and of the Open Internet rules. Without action from the FCC, zero­-rating plans will continue to expand, and ISPs will continue to seek out ways to monetize capped broadband service at the expense of an open Internet and the communities that rely on it. We urge the FCC to respond to the proliferation of these plans, fulfill its mandate to protect Internet users, and enforce its Open Internet rules.


Access Humboldt

Access Now

Allied Media Projects

Alternate ROOTS

Black Alliance for Just Immigration

Center for Media Justice

Center for Rural Strategies

Center for Social Inclusion

Consumers Union

CREDO Action

Daily Kos

Demand Progress

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Ella Baker Center

Fight for the Future

Free Press

Future of Music Coalition


Harry Potter Alliance

Highlander Research and Education Center

Institute for Local Self Reliance

Martinez Street Women's Center

May First/People Link

Media Action Grassroots Network

Media Alliance

Media Mobilizing Project

Million Hoodies Movement for Justice

Movement Strategy Center Civic Action

National Alliance for Media Arts and Culture

National People's Action

New America's Open Technology Institute

New Sanctuary Coalition of NYC


Participatory Culture Foundation

Participatory Politics Foundation

Progressive Change Campaign Committee

Racial Justice Action Center


Rural Broadband Policy Group

St. Paul Neighborhood Network


The Greenlining Institute

The Other 98%

The Utility Reform Network

UltraViolet Education Fund

United Church of Christ, OC Inc.

Urbana-­Champaign Independent Media Center

Voices for Racial Justice

Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press


>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical News Post Listing

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, using Livefyre just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.

You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.

Econintersect Contributors


Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF

The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.

Take a look at what is going on inside of
Main Home
Analysis Blog
Rising Tide Does Not Lift All Ships
Comments on Feyerabend’s ‘Against Method’, Part II
News Blog
Docking A Huge Cruise Ship Is More Complicated Than You Think
New Seasonal Outlook Updates from NOAA and JAMSTEC - Let's Compare Them.
Infographic Of The Day: Driving Into A Battery Powered Future
Earthquake Risk - Location Matters
Investor Alert: Be On The Lookout For Investment Scams Related To Hurricane Matthew
Lost In Translation: Five Common English Phrases You May Be Using Incorrectly
The Size And Scope Of Samsung's Business
Immigration Is The Top Worry For Britons
People Killed By Russian Airstrikes In Syria
Have You Taken These 4 Simple Steps To Improve Your Trading?
14 October 2016: ECRI's WLI Growth Index Insignificantly Declines
Mom Breaks Down In Tears When Son With Autism Meets Service Dog
Rail Week Ending 15 October 2016 Paints A Negative Economic View
Investing Blog
FinTech Is Taking A Bite Out Of Banks
Options Early Assignment - Should You Worry?
Opinion Blog
US 2016 Election: Will US-China Relations Change
Prop. 51 Versus A State-Owned Bank: How California Can Save $10 Billion On A $9 Billion Loan
Precious Metals Blog
How Will The Election Outcome Impact Precious Metals?
Live Markets
21Oct2016 Market Close: Major US Indexes Close Flat On Low Volume, Crude Prices Resume Climb, US Dollar Stabilizes In Mid 98 Handle, Yes, Most Investors Are Worried Which Way This Market Will Go
Amazon Books & More

.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

Crowdfunding ....



Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2016 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved