econintersect.com
       
  

FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.



posted on 27 December 2015

The Costs To Different Generations Of Policies That Close The USA Fiscal Gap

from the Congressional Budget Office

-- this post authored by Shinichi Nishiyama and Felix Reichling

There are five stylized changes in federal fiscal policy that would close a fiscal gap of 1.8 percent of GDP, and measures the costs that those policy changes would impose on different generations.

In 2014, the U.S. government's accumulated debt equaled 74 percent of the nation's gross domestic product (GDP), and it remains at about that percentage today. In the long-term budget projections issued by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) in 2014, under then-current laws future spending was projected to exceed future revenues, and debt held by the public was projected to increase to 225 percent in 2089. A common measure of the government's fiscal imbalance is the fiscal gap - the size of the changes in noninterest spending or revenues that would be needed to make federal debt equal its current percentage of GDP at a specific date in the future. In 2014, CBO estimated that the 75-year fiscal gap was 1.8 percent of GDP; in other words, a permanent increase in federal revenues or reduction in federal spending equal to 1.8 percent of GDP each year starting in 2015 would cause debt to equal 74 percent of GDP, its 2014 level, in 2089.

This analysis examines five stylized changes in fiscal policy designed to close a fiscal gap of 1.8 percent of GDP and keep the debt-to-GDP ratio at 74 percent. The analysis looks at how the policies' costs to households in terms of higher taxes or lower transfers would affect the U.S. economy, aggregate net income, and the well-being (or welfare) of individual households. Policy changes designed to prevent unsustainable growth in debt would affect different types of households differently. For example, the effects of tax increases or benefit cuts would be different for low-income households than for high-income households, and different for poor households than for wealthy households. This analysis examines the effects of policy changes on different generations of households.

There are many possible combinations of fiscal policy changes that would close the fiscal gap and return debt as a percentage of GDP to a sustainable path. The benefits of closing the fiscal gap would be identical for all policies. However, it is not possible to measure any of the gains from moving from an unsustainable to a sustainable policy because an unsustainable policy - by definition - cannot be maintained indefinitely. In contrast, the costs imposed on different generations would depend on the specific policy chosen, and those differences in costs can be measured by CBO's overlapping-generations model. For those reasons, we focus on analyzing the costs to households, and the resulting effects on the macroeconomy, of implementing different policies to close the fiscal gap. That analysis allows us to answer the question of how policies rank in terms of costs imposed on different cohorts. (And because the benefits of closing the fiscal gap are the same for all policies, that analysis also provides a ranking of the overall effects of policies on different households.) Thus, our results provide information to lawmakers choosing among policies to close the fiscal gap. However, our results do not provide answers about who would benefit from closing the fiscal gap, whether closing the fiscal gap should be a priority, or whether lawmakers should start closing the gap now or later.

[click on image below to continue reading]

Source: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/workingpaper/51038-WorkingPaper-2015_10.pdf

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical News Post Listing










Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, using Livefyre just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.



You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.





Econintersect Contributors


search_box

Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF


The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.


Take a look at what is going on inside of Econintersect.com
Main Home
Analysis Blog
The Expected Effects of Petitions to Improve the Monetary System
Energy and Falling Productivity
News Blog
October 2016 Economic Forecast: Outlook Insignificantly Declines But Little Economic Strength Entering 4Q2016
1 Minute. 34 Seconds. In The U.S., That's All It Takes To Register To Vote. A Single Registration Lasts A Lifetime Of Elections. We've Made It Easy For You Here: Http://g.co/elections/134
Durable Goods New Orders Unchanged in August 2016
90% Rally In Sugar Prices Since Late 2015
U.S. Real Wage Growth: Slowing Down With Age - Part 2 Of 2
Infographic Of The Day: Four Tips To Grow Wealth
Early Headlines: Asia Stocks Down, Yen Rises, Oil Soft, Wells CEO Gives Up Bonuses, Trump Didn't Want To Embarass Clinton, US Asset Bubbles, US Crime Rates Falling And More
What is Democracy, Anyway?
Transcript Of Elizabeth Warren Questioning Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf
Documentary Of The Week: Elizabeth Warren Indictment Of Wells Fargo
Clinton Wins Round One
Why Alzheimer's Research Is Failing To Hit Treatment Targets
Voters Still Distrust Both Presidential Candidates
Investing Blog
Banks Of Absurdity
Investing.com Technical Summary 27 September 2016
Opinion Blog
Trump Stumped In First Debate With Clinton - Will It Cost Him?
Why All Banks Should Be Federally Owned
Precious Metals Blog
War On Cash Turns To $20, $50, And $100 Bills
Live Markets
28Sep2016 Pre-Market Commentary: Wall Street Flat Again This Morning, Crude Prices Rise, US Dollar Down And Prospects Are Dim To Cut Oil Output, GS Says Crude Prices Going Down No Matter What
Amazon Books & More






.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government



Crowdfunding ....






























 navigate econintersect.com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2016 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved