FREE NEWSLETTER: Econintersect sends a nightly newsletter highlighting news events of the day, and providing a summary of new articles posted on the website. Econintersect will not sell or pass your email address to others per our privacy policy. You can cancel this subscription at any time by selecting the unsubscribing link in the footer of each email.

posted on 18 November 2015

From Newton To Einstein: The Origins Of General Relativity

from The Conversation

-- this post authored by Krzysztof Bolejko, University of Sydney

One hundred years ago in November 1915, Albert Einstein presented to the Prussian Academy of Sciences his new theory of general relativity. It is fair to say the theory turned out to be a great success.

General relativity was built on Einstein's special relativity, which provided solutions to some of the greatest puzzles of 19th century theoretical physics.

So in order to grasp the meaning and significance of general relativity, it is worth reflecting on the state of physics in the 19th century to see how Einstein came to realise that space, time and geometry are not absolute but depend on the physical environment.

The beauty of invariance

In the 17th century, Isaac Newton developed a set of equations that described the physical properties of the world around us. These equations were very successful, from a description of the flight of a cannonball, to the motion of the planets.

They also had a very appealing property: all observers, regardless of whether they are moving or not - i.e. regardless of which "inertial frame" they are in - are equivalent when it comes to their description of the world around them. So two individuals moving in different directions would see events unfold in the same way.

Even though formally these individuals would see things in a different way - one might say that things move from left to right, whereas the other might say they move from right to left - still the fundamental description of the unfolding events would remain the same, and the laws of physics derived by these individuals would have literally the same form.

But in the 19th century, people started noticing that not everything plays accordingly to this rule.

Problems with electromagnetism

The 19th century was a time of extensive study of the phenomena of electricity, magnetism and light. In 1865 James Clerk Maxwell published a set of equations that combined all these phenomena into a single phenomenon of "electromagnetism".

Soon after Maxwell's discovery, people realised that there is something strange when it comes to his equations. Their form changes when we move from one inertial frame to another. So an individual who is not moving can observe distinctively different physical phenomena than a person who is moving.

All the beauty of invariance and irrelevance of observers that we had got used to in Newtonian physics was gone. It now looked like some frames were preferable to others when it came to describing events in nature.

Then, at the turn of the 20th century, a new mathematical transformation was discovered that could preserve the structure of Maxwell's equations when moving from one frame to another. Although many people contributed to this discovery, we now refer to it as the "Lorentz transformation".

The Lorentz transformation was different from the standard transformation of inertial frames that had been used in the Newtonian physics. In Newtonian physics, length and time are absolute, so the length of an object in one frame is the same as the length of that object in another frame. Also, time passes in the same way in one frame as in the other frame.

However, if taken literally, the Lorentz transformation implies that time and length do actually change, depending on which frame of reference you are in.

Principle of relativity

This got Einstein wondering whether the transformation that preserved the structure of Maxwell's equations was merely a mathematical trick or whether there was something fundamental about it. He wondered whether time and space were absolute, or whether the principle of invariance of the laws of physics should be paramount.

In 1905, Einstein decided that it is the invariance of the laws of physics that should have the highest status, and postulated the principle of relativity: that all inertial frames are equivalent, the observer's motion (with constant velocity) is irrelevant, and that all laws of physics should have the same form in all inertial frames.

When combined with electromagnetism, this principle would require that the transformation from one inertial frame to another must have a structure of the Lorentz transformation, meaning that time and space are no longer absolute and change their properties when changing from one inertial frame to another.

A visualisation of special relativity.

What about gravity?

In 1907 Einstein realised that his theory was not complete. The principle of relativity was only applicable to observers moving with a constant velocity. It also did not fit with the Newtonian description of gravity.

Einstein, being a patent officer, did not have access to laboratory equipment. To compensate, he had to engage himself in thought experiments. He considered various scenarios in his head and worked through them step by step.

These thought experiments showed to him that gravity is not different from acceleration. So standing stationary on the Earth feels just the same as standing in a rocket ship accelerating at a constant 1G.

It also showed that the accelerated observer would observe that fundamental geometrical properties change. For example, that the number π (a mathematical constant) could no longer be defined as a ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter.

So it was not just time and space that lost their absolute meaning, but Einstein realised that also geometry itself was not absolute and could be susceptible to physical conditions.

The road to general relativity

All this reasoning convinced Einstein that the geometry of the spacetime and the physical processes that take place in the spacetime, are related to each other and that one can affect the other.

It also led to a striking conclusion: what we perceive as gravity is just a consequence of the motion through the spacetime. The larger the curvature of the spacetime the stronger gravity is.

Experiment with falling objects. In the 17th century Newton concluded that objects fall because they are pulled by Earth's gravity. Einstein's interpretation was that these objects do not fall. According to Einstein, these objects and Earth just freely move in a curved spacetime and this curvature is induced by mass and energy of these objects.

It took Einstein eight years to find the relation between the geometry of spacetime and physics.

The equations that he presented in 1915 not only led to a completely different interpretation of events around us but also provided an explanation for some baffling or yet to be discovered phenomena: from the anomalous orbit of the planet Mercury, through the bending of light by the Sun's gravity, to predicting the existence of black holes and expanding universe.

It was a bumpy road from Newtownian physics to special and then general relativity. But each step, driven by Einstein's insight, drove inexorably towards a picture of the universe that persists to this day.

The ConversationKrzysztof Bolejko, Cosmologist, University of Sydney

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

>>>>> Scroll down to view and make comments <<<<<<

Click here for Historical News Post Listing

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, using Livefyre just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.

You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.

Econintersect Contributors


Print this page or create a PDF file of this page
Print Friendly and PDF

The growing use of ad blocking software is creating a shortfall in covering our fixed expenses. Please consider a donation to Econintersect to allow continuing output of quality and balanced financial and economic news and analysis.

Take a look at what is going on inside of
Main Home
Analysis Blog
Is Growing Household Debt An Economic Counter-Dynamic?
A New Era of Central Banking?
News Blog
Candid Camera Classic: Dirty Clean Words
How Reliable Are GDP Consensus Forecasts?
What You Don't Know About Your Policy Can Hurt You... Financially
The Revolving Door
Historical Echoes: The Legacy Of Freedman's Savings And Trust
Infographic Of The Day: Major Cruise Ship Accidents
Early Headlines: GOP Senators Back Russia Probe, Industry Appeals Fiduciary Rule Verdict, Pot To Produce More Jobs Than MFG, New Arms Race, Aramco IPO May Disappoint Saudis And More
Who Are The More Dependent Parties In The Brexit Scenario
Super Bowl LI Drew 4th Largest TV Crowd In History
We Taught Bees To Play Football So We Could Learn About Their Brains
The State Of Lending In The United States
What We Read Today 24 February 2017
My Cat Is My Valentine - Furball Fables
Investing Blog
Babson's Ten Commandments Of Trading Weekly Wrap-Up 24 February 2017
Opinion Blog
In Defense Of Greece: An Open Letter To The IMF
As Trump Flounders On Foreign Policy, Russia Flexes Its Nuclear Muscles
Precious Metals Blog
Deflation And Gold: A Contrarian View
Live Markets
24Feb2017 Market Close: Wall Street Rose From Session Lows To Close In The Green Near The Unchanged Line, Short-Term Indicators And Analysts Questioning Continuing Bull Run
Amazon Books & More

.... and keep up with economic news using our dynamic economic newspapers with the largest international coverage on the internet
Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government



Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2017 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved