High-Frequency Trading: Market Destroying Scam

October 14th, 2012
in contributors

Money Morning Article of the Week

by Shah Gilani, Capital Wave Strategist, Money Morning

manipulation-sign-cropped-160x200Let me make this perfectly simple...

High-frequency trading is a scam. It should be outlawed.


Regulators, namely the pimps and panderers at the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the exchanges, all of them, are in on the game.

The game, known as HFT, isn't arbitrage, isn't fair, isn't consistent with the keeping of "fair and orderly markets," and so should be illegal.

Follow up:

In case you don't know, here are the rules of the game...

1.  Pay the exchanges to "co-locate" your servers next to their servers, at the locations where they house them (and rent space to you for that explicit purpose).

2.  Get access to quote information (what stocks are being "bid" for at what price and for how many shares, and what is the "ask" price and number of shares that sellers are trying to unload), and be able to place your own bid and ask quotes as fast as technologically possible.

3.  Get yourself a bunch of money to trade with. You'll need millions, so maybe form a partnership to raise money or partner with some banks that don't already have their own HFT desks, you know, the ones that want to hide what they do.

4.  Get yourself a few nuclear physicists, rocket scientists, and computer wizards to write algorithms that can read quotes on both sides of every stock to determine patterns, the depth of markets, and how many shares you can buy or sell and then sell or buy in a matter of less than one-hundredth or one-thousandth of a second.

5.  Get your computers to fire off fake bid and ask quotes all the time to see how that changes others' quotes, in anticipation that they might show how bad they want to buy or sell, and when you get to a place where you can fire trades to buy and sell, almost simultaneously, buy and sell or sell and buy however many shares you can to lock in a profit, no matter how small.

6.  Get busier and busier doing this more and more, because you're only working for a tiny profit on every trade, so do it to trade at least 3.5 billion shares a day, which is half of all the shares that the nation's 13 exchanges trade daily.

7.  Get faster computers and bandwidth and execution speed. If you reach some limit, go the other way. Figure out how to slow down other traders by gumming up the systems everyone uses; you know all the exchanges' systems that the SEC is supposed to be ensuring provides everyone fair and equal access to. Jam them all up with crazy amounts of fake quotes to increase "latency" (the time it takes to get from A to B for a computer, for other people, like mutual funds and pension peons) so you can head fake them and get your own trades off.

8.  Get rich gaming the system!

Look, it's not even a 12-step program. Just eight simple steps.

You can do it yourself. No one will stop you.

It's all legal, you know.

And at that Senate Banking Committee hearing on September 20, you know, the one where a former HFT guy named David Lauer came to testify that the game is rigged in "their" favor, and how he was pissed because he didn't have enough money behind him to buy enough new technology and pay off enough exchanges to get the faster access and cooler algos so he could make the millions he wanted, which is why he got into the business in the first place, yeah, that guy - even he said the game is rigged.

Lauer didn't say it was illegal. Of course, he wouldn't incriminate himself. And the Senators, they all nodded that the game did look rigged, but because it wasn't illegal, they'd have to think about what they heard and see who would now donate what to their campaign finance algorithms.

Personally, I feel sorry for him - Lauer, the tattletale. He's obviously not good enough at what he was doing to compete. Poor fellow. I think he cut class the day they taught the lesson on "creative destruction." At least it looks like he made it to the lecture on tactical assault practices that obviously included "subtle carpet bombing" and "scorched-earth techniques."

But I digress.

There's nothing redeeming about high-frequency trading. Nothing.

Maybe I should write a real article on why it's a bunch of crap and who's really behind it?

Oh, I've done that. I did it two-and-a-half years ago, here at Money Morning.

Guess it's time to do it again. Look for it in your mailbox on Monday.


Related Articles at Money Morning


Related Articles at Global Economic Intersection

Opinion and Investing articles by Shah Gilani

Analysis and Investing articles about High Frequency Trading

About the Author

Shah Gilani is the managing editor of Wall Street Insights & Indictments, a seasoned veteran of Wall Street and former hedge fund manager. During his career, he was a successful trader and held a seat on the Chicago Board of Exchange, gained knowledge from the desks of Lloyd's Bank and gained experience from New York and Boston investment banks and trading houses. For a free online subscription to Wall Street Insights & Indictments, please contact: customerservice@wallstreetinsightsandindictments.com

Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted. You can also comment using Facebook directly using he comment block below.

1 comment

  1. Bill says :

    Why not just wait 1 or 2 seconds between the time the trade is executed and the time it is reported?

 navigate econintersect.com


Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day


Asia / Pacific
Middle East / Africa
USA Government

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution



  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2018 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved