When Should Public Debt Be Reduced?

June 9th, 2015
in News, econ_news, syndication

Econintersect:  The headline is the question forming the title of a paper published this month by IMF (International Montary Fund) economists, Jonathan D. Ostry, Atish R. Ghosh, and Raphael Espinoza.  The "paper" is really less formal than a document prepared for a professional journal, and is labeled by the IMF as an "IMF Staff Discussion Note".  The question discussed regards the handling of sovereign debt during and following financial crisis and specifically discusses situations resulting from the Great Financial Crisis of 2008.

reducing.debt.burden.380x190

Follow up:

The paper describes a "pure theory of public debt" which focuses on "the debt we owe ourselves".  In this framework, which does not include inter-generational issues and international transfers, the authors assert:

To yield policy insights, the framework must incorporate two features: at least part of government spending should be on productive public capital; and only distortionary taxes should be available to finance spending. In such a setup, public borrowing does not relax the economy's flow resource constraint, and public spending necessarily crowds out private spending. The purpose of public debt is to shift the burden of taxation over time so as to reduce its total distortive cost.

Econintersect note:  This appears to be based on a loanable funds theory of banking and therefore does not include the private sector creation of credit. It is by such mechanisms that the result empirically observed shows an increase in private sector savings with increasing sovereign debt.  In such an environment, which we submit is operative currently, crowding out of the private sector does not occur with government deficits.  Crowding out occurs with government surpluses when taxation is removing public savings.  Of course the discussion by the authors of the burden of interest payments on government debt is not affected by this incorrect assessment of crowding out:  Interest payments on government debt (we do not include the possibility of rolling interest due into deficits) require part of the tax inflows which are thereby not available for public investment.


The paper concludes that reduction of sovereign debt for countries "in the green zone" is likely to be "normatively undesirable as the costs involved will be larger than the resulting benefits" in environments where recovery from a financial crisis is in progress.

fiscal.space

Click on title page below to read the entire paper:

reduce.public.debt









Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.















 navigate econintersect.com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2016 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved