Palm Trees in Antarctica and a Subtropical North Pole

August 6th, 2012
in econ_news, syndication

Econintersect:  No, this is not a report of some global warming research projection.  It is a fact that more than 50 million years ago the climate of anarctica-coastSMALLearth was much warmer but more moderate than today and the poles saw temperatures that were very similar to the equator, with temperatures ranging from 50 - 77 degrees F (10 - 25 degress Celcius), according to research published last week in Nature.  The period, known as the early Eocene has been referred to as the Eocene greenhouse, a warm analogue to the current earth.  One characteristic of the period was that CO2 levels were 2-3 times as high as in the modern day.  The entire Eocene period covered the time from about 56 million years ago up to about 34 million years ago and is the period in which the first modern mammals begain to emerge.

Click on picture to see enlarged view of Antarctica's coast.  See if you can spot the palm trees.

Follow up:

New findings by researchers drilling in the ocean floor off East Antarctica have revealed pollen and spores associated with near-tropical forests that included palm trees.  One remarkable finding is that the temperature profile that is defined by the research does not go below about 50 degrees F (10 degrees C) during the long polar "winter" night.  The researchers indicate that their findings may be valuable in interpretign what future climates may be like for earth.  From the abstract:

The warmest global climates of the past 65 million years occurred during the early Eocene epoch (about 55 to 48 million years ago), when the Equator-to-pole temperature gradients were much smaller than today1, 2 and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were in excess of one thousand parts per million by volume3, 4. Recently the early Eocene has received considerable interest because it may provide insight into the response of Earth’s climate and biosphere to the high atmospheric carbon dioxide levels that are expected in the near future5 as a consequence of unabated anthropogenic carbon emissions4, 6

An article at the BBC has an interview quote from one of the study's co-authors:

"There are two ways of looking at where we're going in the future," said a co-author of the study, James Bendle of the University of Glasgow.

"One is using physics-based climate models; but increasingly we're using this 'back to the future' approach where we look through periods in the geological past that are similar to where we may be going in 10 years, or 20, or several hundred," he told BBC News.

Previous research had found that the Arctic Ocean was once a subtropical shallow sea in the same early Eocene period.

John Lounsbury

Sources:

Hat tip to Naked Capitalism.









Make a Comment

Econintersect wants your comments, data and opinion on the articles posted.  As the internet is a "war zone" of trolls, hackers and spammers - Econintersect must balance its defences against ease of commenting.  We have joined with Livefyre to manage our comment streams.

To comment, just click the "Sign In" button at the top-left corner of the comment box below. You can create a commenting account using your favorite social network such as Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn or Open ID - or open a Livefyre account using your email address.











1 comment

  1. Paul Hanly says :

    Assuming this to be true, the two questions we must all ask are:
    1. what is the probability of a repetition of this back to the future period?
    2. what will happen during the transition from today to this back to the future period assuming it does come to pass?

    So what are the features of the periods immediately before this period of Eden, what were the other features of the time and was human life thriving in the period of transition and Eden.

    Personally I'm sticking with the mainstream science and advocating a risk management approach to the preservation of the status quo.

    We only have one planet.

    The mainstream scientific opinion of longstanding climate and scientific organisations is overwhelmingly in support of the IPCC.

    See the wikipedia page:
    Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change





 navigate econintersect.com

Blogs

Analysis Blog
News Blog
Investing Blog
Opinion Blog
Precious Metals Blog
Markets Blog
Video of the Day
Weather

Newspapers

Asia / Pacific
Europe
Middle East / Africa
Americas
USA Government
     

RSS Feeds / Social Media

Combined Econintersect Feed
Google+
Facebook
Twitter
Digg

Free Newsletter

Marketplace - Books & More

Economic Forecast

Content Contribution

Contact

About

  Top Economics Site

Investing.com Contributor TalkMarkets Contributor Finance Blogs Free PageRank Checker Active Search Results Google+

This Web Page by Steven Hansen ---- Copyright 2010 - 2016 Econintersect LLC - all rights reserved